Stigma and a Shared Decision Aid

June 20, 2025 updated by: Washington University School of Medicine

Piloting a Shared Decision-Making Aid for Reducing Stigma in Drug Use and HIV Harm Reduction in a Rural Setting

A major barrier for the uptake of evidence-based interventions to address the ongoing opioid epidemic in the US, especially in rural regions, is stigma, which occurs at many levels, including that of the patient and provider. A shared decision making aid is an evidence-based method for increasing engagement and knowledge of both patients and providers, potentially democratizing treatment decisions, especially in stigmatized conditions. The investigators propose to adapt and pilot a decision aid for opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment and harm reduction in two hospitals in rural Missouri to evaluate whether this reduces stigma in both patients and providers.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In the past decade, the US opioid crisis has emerged as a leading cause of death among adults. It has also led to an increase in invasive bacterial and fungal infections; and HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) outbreaks in multiple regions. Rural communities have had an especially disproportionate burden from the impact of opioid use disorder (OUD). Treatment of OUD with pharmacotherapy is one of the most effective strategies for reducing OUD-related mortality and morbidity. But while there has been increasing will for expanding pharmacotherapy, stigma - from community, providers and patients-remains a significant barrier to uptake pharmacotherapy and harm reduction. The approach to substance use has historically favored abstinence strategies that are often without evidence, influenced by punitive, stigmatizing framework. This stigma may be even more prevalent in rural communities. To date there have been very few effective interventions to address inter- and intrapersonal stigma, and none with sustained effectiveness. The investigators propose adapting and piloting a shared decision-making aid for patients presenting to the emergency department or are being admitted at two hospitals in rural Missouri, where there is a high prevalence of OUD and its complications. The decision-aid is an evidence-based intervention show to increase knowledge, engagement and decision-making concordant with patient values in a variety of medical conditions. It is feasible that by democratizing treatment and standardizing decision-making counseling, the decision aid can mediate attitudes and reduce stigma. The investigators hypothesize by delivering standardized, high-quality knowledge to both provider and patient, that stigma can be reduced in both parties. In Aim 1 the investigators will adapt an existing decision aid for OUD treatment to the specific context of rural hospital care. This decision aid will be a part of an existing bundled care program for OUD and related infections that the investigators have implemented in these hospitals. In Aim 2 the investigators will conduct a randomized pilot comparing the decision aid intervention with counseling as usual without decision aid to assess feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness for reducing stigma in substance use, HIV, OUD pharmacotherapy and harm reduction. The investigators will measure these around the time of the intervention and in longitudinal follow up. The findings could potentially identify a novel intervention and methodology for treatment expansion and stigma reduction that has not been previously explored, especially in the rural context, where need is high. Following the successful completion of this pilot trial, the investigators will develop an expanded multi-site comparative effectiveness trial of the decision aid, implementation studies, and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
62

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Barnes Jewish Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients from a rural community currently admitted or recently admitted to Barnes-Jewish Hospital
  • Admission must be for an infection associated with intravenous drug use
  • Patient must be willing to speak with healthcare provider about medications for opioid use disorder (MOUDs)
  • patient must be over 18 years old
  • must be able to complete electronic survey written in English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Baseline Counseling As Usual - Patient
Patients randomized to the baseline counseling from their healthcare provider regarding medications for opioid use disorder.
Active Comparator: Shared Decision Making Aid - Patient
Patients randomized to the decision aid arm will receive all of the above as well as a shared decision making aid. This will be a 10-minute survey that takes into account their priorities and preferences around medications for opioid use disorder.
Behavioral: Shared Decision Making Aid - Patients
Patients will be randomized to the shared decision making aid intervention.
No Intervention: Baseline Counseling As Usual - Provider
Providers of patients randomized to the baseline counseling as usual arm will will be asked to participate in a survey to assess their stigma in regards to taking care of patients with opioid use disorder.
Active Comparator: Shared Decision Making Aid - Provider
Providers of patients randomized to the decision aid arm will will be asked to participate in a survey to assess their stigma in regards to taking care of patients with opioid use disorder.
Behavioral: Shared Decision Making Aid - Providers
Providers of patients randomized o the shared decision making aid intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Internalized Stigma Towards Medicaid for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUDs) Over the Course of the Project
Time Frame: 3 months
Sum of 6 5-point Likert scale questions that determines self-reported stigma on taking MOUDs. This was compromised of 6 separate questions with a scale of 1-5 with 1 having the lowest stigma and 5 having the highest stigma. The range is thus 6 - 30.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Anticipated MOUD Stigma
Time Frame: 3 months
This 5-point Likert scale was compromised of 7 questions of a range of 7-35. The lower score denotes the lower stigma and the higher score denotes the higher stigma.
3 months
Patient Satisfaction With Clarity of Shared Decision Aid
Time Frame: Immediate post-baseline survey
Likert scale from 1-4 with 1 being the best and 4 being the worst. There is no statistical analysis for this secondary outcome as patients who did not receive the decision aid cannot provide satisfaction regarding clarity of shared decision aid.
Immediate post-baseline survey
Patient Satisfaction With Helpfulness of Shared Decision Aid
Time Frame: Immediate post-baseline survey
Likert scale from 1-4 with 1 being the best and 4 being the worst
Immediate post-baseline survey
Overall Patient Satisfaction With the Shared Decision Aid
Time Frame: Immediate post-baseline survey
"I like the decision aid", "The decision aid is appealing", "The decision aid is easy to use", and "The decision aid is doable". The scale range is 1 to 2 with a score of 1 being a better outcome.
Immediate post-baseline survey
Provider Willingness To Work With Patients With Opioid Use Disorder
Time Frame: Immediately post-intervention
5-point Likert scale where score of 1 is the most stigma and 5 is the least stigma. The overall number is a sum of 4 questions with a theoretical range of 4 - 20.
Immediately post-intervention
Hospital Policy Stigma Towards Patients With Opioid Use Disorder
Time Frame: Immediate
5-point Likert scale where score of 1 least stigma towards patients with opioid use disorder and 5 is the highest stigma towards patients with opioid use disorder. The overall number is a sum of 4 questions with a theoretical range of 4 - 20.
Immediate
Provider Comfort Treating Patients With Opioid Use Disorder
Time Frame: Immediate post-intervention
A 6 question 5-point Likert scale with a scale of 1= least stigma and 5=most stigma. A total of 6 questions were asked. Thus the range is 6 - 30.
Immediate post-intervention
Provider Stigma Towards Patients With Opioid Use Order
Time Frame: Immediate
A 6 question 5-point Likert scale with a scale of 1= least stigma and 5=most stigma. A total of 6 questions were asked. Thus the range is 6 - 30.
Immediate

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Washington University School of Medicine

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Michael J. Durkin, MD, Washington University School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 7, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 18, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 28, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 20, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 202107155

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings