The Effects of Making Pregnant Women With Preterm Birth Threat Watch Nature Images With Virtual Reality Goggles on the Levels of Stress, Anxiety, Attachment, and Care Satisfaction
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Konya, Turkey, 42130
- Selcuk University Faculty of Health Sciences
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- who are in the age group of 18 and over,
- Able to speak Turkish and express himself in Turkish,
- Not visually or hearing impaired,
- Diagnosed with the threat of premature birth,
- Between 24-37 weeks of gestation,
- Primiparous,
- Single pregnancy,
- Open to communication, spiritually and mentally healthy,
- Pregnant women who are married and living with their spouses.
Exclusion Criteria:
- In addition to the diagnosis of threat of preterm birth, other diagnoses (preeclampsia, fetal distress, premature rupture of membranes, gestational diabetes, bleeding, etc.)
- Having a chronic disease
- Women who are pregnant by assisted reproductive techniques.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: watching video with virtual reality glasses
|
Device: Watching videos with nature images accompanied by nature sounds with virtual reality glasses
The video with nature images accompanied by the sounds of nature with virtual reality glasses will be watched 3 times a day for at least 5 minutes for 2 days.
|
|
No Intervention: routine maintenance, no intervention
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21)
Time Frame: first day
|
Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21); It was created as an abbreviation of DASS-42 developed by Lovibond and Lovibond (1995) (Lovibond and Lovibond 1995).
The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Sarıçam in 2018.
Scale "Depression (3rd, 5th, 10th, 13th, 16th, 17th, 21st)", "Anxiety (2nd, 4th, 7th, 9th, 15th, 19th, 20.)" and "Stress (1st, 6th, 8th, 11th, 12th, 14th, 18th)" and 21 questions.
Items in the scale; 4-point Likert-type scoring ranging from ''(0) never', ''(1) sometimes and sometimes'', ''(2) quite often'' and ''(3) always'' evaluated over.
A minimum of 0 and a maximum of 21 points can be obtained from each sub-dimension.
The higher the score, the higher the level of depression, anxiety and stress (Sarıçam 2018).
In this study, the 'stress sub-dimension' of the DASS-21 scale will be used
|
first day
|
|
State Anxiety Scale
Time Frame: first day
|
It was developed by Spielberger et al. in 1970 (Spielberger et al. 1970).
Its adaptation to Turkish society, validity and reliability were done by Öner and Le Compte in 1985.
The State Anxiety Scale consists of 20 items.
The items expressing the emotions and behaviors in the scales vary in 4 levels as "(1) Not at all", "(2) A little", "(3) A lot" and "(4) Completely".
It is evaluated on a 5-point Likert-type scoring system.
A high score indicates a high level of anxiety.
A score of six or less indicates no anxiety, 37-42 indicates mild anxiety, and a score of 43 and above indicates high anxiety (Öner and Le Compte 1985).
|
first day
|
|
The Prenatal Attachment Inventory
Time Frame: first day
|
Prenatal Attachment Inventory; It is a 21-item scale developed by Mary Muller in 1993 to explain the feelings, thoughts and situations experienced by women during pregnancy and to determine the level of attachment to the fetus during the prenatal period (Muller 1993).
The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was carried out by Yılmaz and Beji in 2009.
Participants scored each item on a 4-point Likert-type rating scale as "(1) Never", "(2) Sometimes", "(3) Often", "(4) Always".
evaluates over.
A minimum of 21 and a maximum of 84 points can be obtained from the scale.
As the score obtained by the pregnant increases, the level of attachment increases.
The applicability of the scale for pregnant women at 20 weeks of gestation and above was found to be reliable and valid.
Yılmaz and Beji found the Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient as 0.84 in the internal consistency analysis of the scale (Yılmaz and Beji 3013).
|
first day
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21)
Time Frame: second day
|
Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21); It was created as an abbreviation of DASS-42 developed by Lovibond and Lovibond (1995) (Lovibond and Lovibond 1995).
The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Sarıçam in 2018.
Scale "Depression (3rd, 5th, 10th, 13th, 16th, 17th, 21st)", "Anxiety (2nd, 4th, 7th, 9th, 15th, 19th, 20.)" and "Stress (1st, 6th, 8th, 11th, 12th, 14th, 18th)" and 21 questions.
Items in the scale; 4-point Likert-type scoring ranging from ''(0) never', ''(1) sometimes and sometimes'', ''(2) quite often'' and ''(3) always'' evaluated over.
A minimum of 0 and a maximum of 21 points can be obtained from each sub-dimension.
The higher the score, the higher the level of depression, anxiety and stress (Sarıçam 2018).
In this study, the 'stress sub-dimension' of the DASS-21 scale will be used
|
second day
|
|
State Anxiety Scale
Time Frame: second day
|
It was developed by Spielberger et al. in 1970 (Spielberger et al. 1970).
Its adaptation to Turkish society, validity and reliability were done by Öner and Le Compte in 1985.
The State Anxiety Scale consists of 20 items.
The items expressing the emotions and behaviors in the scales vary in 4 levels as "(1) Not at all", "(2) A little", "(3) A lot" and "(4) Completely".
It is evaluated on a 5-point Likert-type scoring system.
A high score indicates a high level of anxiety.
A score of six or less indicates no anxiety, 37-42 indicates mild anxiety, and a score of 43 and above indicates high anxiety (Öner and Le Compte 1985).
|
second day
|
|
The Prenatal Attachment Inventory
Time Frame: second day
|
Prenatal Attachment Inventory; It is a 21-item scale developed by Mary Muller in 1993 to explain the feelings, thoughts and situations experienced by women during pregnancy and to determine the level of attachment to the fetus during the prenatal period (Muller 1993).
The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was carried out by Yılmaz and Beji in 2009.
Participants scored each item on a 4-point Likert-type rating scale as "(1) Never", "(2) Sometimes", "(3) Often", "(4) Always".
evaluates over.
A minimum of 21 and a maximum of 84 points can be obtained from the scale.
As the score obtained by the pregnant increases, the level of attachment increases.
The applicability of the scale for pregnant women at 20 weeks of gestation and above was found to be reliable and valid.
Yılmaz and Beji found the Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient as 0.84 in the internal consistency analysis of the scale (Yılmaz and Beji 3013
|
second day
|
|
Virtual Reality Glasses (SGG) Application Satisfaction Level Information Form
Time Frame: second day
|
This form was prepared by the researchers to determine the level of satisfaction of the pregnant women in the intervention group from the video watched with virtual reality glasses.
|
second day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008 Jan 5;371(9606):75-84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4.
- Gur EY, Apay SE. The effect of cognitive behavioral techniques using virtual reality on birth pain: a randomized controlled trial. Midwifery. 2020 Dec;91:102856. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102856. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
- Frey DP, Bauer ME, Bell CL, Low LK, Hassett AL, Cassidy RB, Boyer KD, Sharar SR. Virtual Reality Analgesia in Labor: The VRAIL Pilot Study-A Preliminary Randomized Controlled Trial Suggesting Benefit of Immersive Virtual Reality Analgesia in Unmedicated Laboring Women. Anesth Analg. 2019 Jun;128(6):e93-e96. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003649.
- Garcia-Blanco A, Diago V, Serrano De La Cruz V, Hervas D, Chafer-Pericas C, Vento M. Can stress biomarkers predict preterm birth in women with threatened preterm labor? Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017 Sep;83:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.05.021. Epub 2017 May 25.
- Glover V. Maternal depression, anxiety and stress during pregnancy and child outcome; what needs to be done. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Jan;28(1):25-35. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.08.017. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
- Grigoriadis S, Graves L, Peer M, Mamisashvili L, Tomlinson G, Vigod SN, Dennis CL, Steiner M, Brown C, Cheung A, Dawson H, Rector NA, Guenette M, Richter M. Maternal Anxiety During Pregnancy and the Association With Adverse Perinatal Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 4;79(5):17r12011. doi: 10.4088/JCP.17r12011.
- Hajesmaeel-Gohari S, Sarpourian F, Shafiei E. Virtual reality applications to assist pregnant women: a scoping review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Mar 25;21(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03725-5.
- Hoyer J, Wieder G, Hofler M, Krause L, Wittchen HU, Martini J. Do lifetime anxiety disorders (anxiety liability) and pregnancy-related anxiety predict complications during pregnancy and delivery? Early Hum Dev. 2020 May;144:105022. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105022. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
- Lilliecreutz C, Laren J, Sydsjo G, Josefsson A. Effect of maternal stress during pregnancy on the risk for preterm birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jan 15;16:5. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0775-x.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- SU12345
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- Informed Consent Form (ICF)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.