The Study on Clinical Outcome and Treatment Optimization of Chronic Hepatitis B Patients With Hypoviremia

May 9, 2022 updated by: Yao Xie, Beijing Ditan Hospital

The Clinical Outcomes of Optimize Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B Patients With Low-level Viremia Undergoing Nucleoside Treatment

Chronic hepatitis B seriously endangers the health of our people, especially the occurrence of HCC, which brings huge economic burden and life threat to our people. 84% - 92% of HCC in China is related to chronic HBV infection. How to further reduce the risk of liver cancer is an urgent problem to be solved in clinical research and an important direction. Although NAs treatment can make patients achieve the negative transformation of virus, it can not effectively reduce the level of virus antigen, and it also lacks the ability to improve the immune clearance of virus. As a result, the incidence of liver cancer in patients with long-term NA treatment is still 4.5% - 10.5%, and the incidence of HCC in patients with hypoviremia in Na treatment is higher. In current clinical practice, nearly 1 / 3 of patients treated with NAs can not reach the detection line of highly sensitive reagent. It is an important measure to make the patients with hypoviremia and inactive low virus replication treated by NAs below the detection line of highly sensitive reagent and further reduce the risk of HCC. However, it is still not enough to minimize the risk of HCC to achieve a complete viral response only through NA treatment. The long-term follow-up showed that the incidence of HBsAg disappeared by only 2.0% - 0.0% regardless of the long-term treatment of HBsAg. Therefore, the most important measure to minimize the occurrence of HCC is to optimize the treatment of NA treated patients with low virus replication and inactive patients with low virus replication to achieve complete virus response and clinical cure. The purpose of this study is to explore the optimal treatment scheme for chronic hepatitis B NA treated patients with hypoviremia and natural low virus replication patients to significantly reduce the risk of HCC.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Chronic hepatitis B seriously endangers the health of our people, especially the occurrence of liver cancer, which brings huge economic burden and life threat to our people. 84% - 92% of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in China is related to chronic HBV infection. How to further reduce the risk of liver cancer is an urgent problem to be solved in clinical research and an important direction. Although NAs treatment can make patients achieve the negative transformation of virus, it can not effectively reduce the level of virus antigen, and it also lacks the ability to improve the immune clearance of virus. As a result, the incidence of liver cancer in patients with long-term NA treatment is still 4.5% - 10.5%, and the incidence of HCC in patients with hypoviremia in Na treatment is higher. In current clinical practice, nearly 1 / 3 of patients treated with NAs can not reach the detection line of highly sensitive reagent. It is an important measure to make the patients with hypoviremia and inactive low virus replication treated by NAs below the detection line of highly sensitive reagent and further reduce the risk of HCC. However, it is still not enough to minimize the risk of HCC to achieve a complete viral response only through NA treatment. The long-term follow-up showed that the incidence of HBsAg disappeared by only 2.0% - 0.0% regardless of the long-term treatment of HBsAg. Therefore, the most important measure to minimize the occurrence of HCC is to optimize the treatment of NA treated patients with low virus replication and inactive patients with low virus replication to achieve complete virus response and clinical cure. The purpose of this study is to explore the optimal treatment scheme for chronic hepatitis B Na treated patients with hypoviremia and natural low virus replication patients to significantly reduce the risk of liver cancer.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100015
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Hepatology Division 2, Beijing Ditan Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 56 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Chronic hepatitis B patients with Hypoviremia after Das therapy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged from 16 to 60;
  • The positive time of HBsAg was 6 months,
  • 48 weeks of treatment with ETV, TDF or TAF, including HBeAg positive and negative patients;
  • High sensitive reagent was used to confirm that the low level of serum HBV DNA was 20 IU / ml-2000 IU / ml.
  • Good compliance and sign informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis or previous decompensated liver cirrhosis;
  2. Those who have used interferon within 6 months;
  3. at the same time, it is associated with other virus infections, such as hepatitis A virus, hepatitis C virus, hepatitis D virus, hepatitis E virus, AIDS virus, etc;
  4. in addition to hepatitis B, there are other serious physical and mental diseases, including uncontrolled primary kidney, heart, lung, vascular, neurological, digestive, severe metabolic diseases (such as uncontrolled hyperthyroidism, serious complications of diabetes and adrenal diseases), immune deficiency diseases, and severe infections; Active or suspected malignant tumor or history of malignant tumor;
  5. 6 months before enrollment or currently receiving corticosteroids, immunosuppressants and chemotherapeutic drugs;
  6. Complicated with alcoholic liver disease, autoimmune liver disease and other liver diseases;
  7. HBV resistant patients;
  8. Other situations that the researcher believes are not suitable for inclusion.

PegIFN α Treatment contraindications:

  1. Prohibited for known pairs α- Patients who are allergic to interferon, E. coli products, polyethylene glycol or any component of this product;
  2. It is forbidden to be used in patients with autoimmune hepatitis;
  3. Pregnant and lactating women;
  4. Central nervous system diseases, mental diseases, uncontrolled epilepsy, non withdrawal of alcohol / drug abuse, decompensated liver cirrhosis, symptomatic heart disease, uncontrolled autoimmune diseases and severe thyroid function diseases;
  5. Absolute neutrophil count before treatment ≤ 1.0 × 109 / L, platelet ≤ 80 × 109/L。

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
PEG-IFN optimized treatment group
Patients received optimized treatment of NAs (ETV + TDF or ETV + TAF) combined with PEG-IFN ETV 0.5 mg, TDF 300 mg or TAF 25 mg, oral once a day, PEG-IFN 180 or 135 micrograms, subcutaneous injection once a week, with a personalized course of treatment of 24 weeks.
Drug: PEG-IFN
PEG-IFN 180 or 135 micrograms, subcutaneously injected once a week, with a personalized treatment course of 24 weeks
NAs optimized treatment group
Patients received NAS (ETV + TDF or ETV + TAF) combination therapy and continued NAs maintenance therapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of HCC during the project study
Time Frame: 48 weeks
In the intervention treatment of the above Na treated patients with hypoviremia, the NAS treatment patients who did not have the disappearance of HBsAg have been maintained for a long time, and long-term treatment and follow-up observation are still carried out after the end of the project. For patients treated with NAS combined with PEG-IFN, if HBsAg disappears, continue the treatment after HBsAg disappears, and stop all drug treatment after 12-24 weeks. For the patients who have not lost HBsAg after PEG-IFN combined with NAS treatment, the researcher shall decide whether to stop all drug treatment or stop PEG-IFN treatment and continue NAS maintenance treatment according to the treatment response.
48 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The negative conversion rate of HBV DNA after 48 weeks of treatment was optimized (below the detection line of highly sensitive detection reagent)
Time Frame: 48 weeks
In the intervention treatment of the above Na treated patients with hypoviremia, the NAS treatment patients who did not have the disappearance of HBsAg have been maintained for a long time, and long-term treatment and follow-up observation are still carried out after the end of the project. For patients treated with NAS combined with PEG-IFN, if HBsAg disappears, continue the treatment after HBsAg disappears, and stop all drug treatment after 12-24 weeks. For the patients who have not lost HBsAg after PEG-IFN combined with NAS treatment, the researcher shall decide whether to stop all drug treatment or stop PEG-IFN treatment and continue NAS maintenance treatment according to the treatment response.
48 weeks
The incidence of HBsAg disappearance during the study period;
Time Frame: 48 weeks
In the intervention treatment of the above Na treated patients with hypoviremia, the NAS treatment patients who did not have the disappearance of HBsAg have been maintained for a long time, and long-term treatment and follow-up observation are still carried out after the end of the project. For patients treated with NAS combined with PEG-IFN, if HBsAg disappears, continue the treatment after HBsAg disappears, and stop all drug treatment after 12-24 weeks. For the patients who have not lost HBsAg after PEG-IFN combined with NAS treatment, the researcher shall decide whether to stop all drug treatment or stop PEG-IFN treatment and continue NAS maintenance treatment according to the treatment response.
48 weeks
HBeAg seroconversion rate in HBeAg positive patients;
Time Frame: 48 weeks
In the intervention treatment of the above Na treated patients with hypoviremia, the NAS treatment patients who did not have the disappearance of HBsAg have been maintained for a long time, and long-term treatment and follow-up observation are still carried out after the end of the project. For patients treated with NAS combined with PEG-IFN, if HBsAg disappears, continue the treatment after HBsAg disappears, and stop all drug treatment after 12-24 weeks. For the patients who have not lost HBsAg after PEG-IFN combined with NAS treatment, the researcher shall decide whether to stop all drug treatment or stop PEG-IFN treatment and continue NAS maintenance treatment according to the treatment response.
48 weeks
Incidence of chronic hepatitis B during the study period
Time Frame: 48 weeks
In the intervention treatment of the above Na treated patients with hypoviremia, the NAS treatment patients who did not have the disappearance of HBsAg have been maintained for a long time, and long-term treatment and follow-up observation are still carried out after the end of the project. For patients treated with NAS combined with PEG-IFN, if HBsAg disappears, continue the treatment after HBsAg disappears, and stop all drug treatment after 12-24 weeks. For the patients who have not lost HBsAg after PEG-IFN combined with NAS treatment, the researcher shall decide whether to stop all drug treatment or stop PEG-IFN treatment and continue NAS maintenance treatment according to the treatment response.
48 weeks
To study the incidence of complications such as cirrhotic ascites and upper gastrointestinal bleeding during long-term follow-up.
Time Frame: 48 weeks
In the intervention treatment of the above Na treated patients with hypoviremia, the NAS treatment patients who did not have the disappearance of HBsAg have been maintained for a long time, and long-term treatment and follow-up observation are still carried out after the end of the project. For patients treated with NAS combined with PEG-IFN, if HBsAg disappears, continue the treatment after HBsAg disappears, and stop all drug treatment after 12-24 weeks. For the patients who have not lost HBsAg after PEG-IFN combined with NAS treatment, the researcher shall decide whether to stop all drug treatment or stop PEG-IFN treatment and continue NAS maintenance treatment according to the treatment response.
48 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Beijing Ditan Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Beijing YouAn Hospital
Beijing 302 Hospital/5th Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 27, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 27, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 12, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 9, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CFH2022-1-2172

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings