Telecare Rehabilitation Program in Chronic Low Back Pain with Psychological Retention and Predominant Sociability (TELELOMB)
Evaluation of the Functional Efficacy of a Multidisciplinary Telecare Rehabilitation Program in Chronic Low Back Pain with Psychological Retention and Predominant Sociability : Single Center Randomized Controlled, Single-blind Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Philippe Gallien
- Phone Number: 02.99.29.50.21
- Email: philippe.gallien@pole-sthelier.com
Study Locations
-
-
Bretagne
-
Rennes, Bretagne, France, 35043
- Pôle Saint-Hélier
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Chronic low back pain (evolution of more than 3 months)
- Patient treated for this pathology in a multidisciplinary program
- Dallas score > 50% in anxiety/depression and sociability dimensions
- Patient who has given free and informed consent to participate in the research
- Patient affiliated to a social security scheme or beneficiary of such a scheme.
- Patient with an internet connection at home, allowing videoconferencing and a digital tool with web cam (tablet or computer).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Recent spine surgery (< 3 months at inclusion visit)
- Cardiovascular risk factor contraindicating sports practice.
- Severe psychiatric pathology
- Low back pain of tumoral or inflammatory origin.
- Associated motor or sensory, neurological impairment.
- Disabling root irradiation
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Patients under legal protection (guardianship, curators or safeguard of justice).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional care in a day hospital
|
A common face to face day hospital combining physical therapies with psychotherapeutic support such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to combat kinesiophobia.
A Second phase of 5 weeks of care in face to face day hospital of the reconditioning type of 15 sessions.
|
|
Experimental: Telecare rehabilitation
|
A common face to face day hospital combining physical therapies with psychotherapeutic support such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to combat kinesiophobia.
A Second phase of 5 weeks of telecare rehabilitation of the reconditioning type of 15 sessions.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 3 months after the end of rehabilitation
|
Overall score of the Oswestry self-questionnaire.
The score goes from 0 to 50, It will be converted into a percentage (Score ODI).
Zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible.
|
3 months after the end of rehabilitation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Economic efficiency
Time Frame: At the end of the rehabilitation
|
The economic efficiency of personalized rehabilitation at the end of the rehabilitation measured by the cost of transport evaluated according to the functional evolution by Oswestry.
|
At the end of the rehabilitation
|
|
Spontaneous pain
Time Frame: At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
|
The spontaneous pain measured by Visual Analogic Scale, from 0 to 100.
The 0 represents no pain at all and 100 the worth pain imaginable.
|
At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
|
|
Overall flexibility
Time Frame: At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
|
Measured finger ground distance in centimeters.
The patient is asked to touch the ground with both hands while standing with the knees in extension.
The distance between the fingertip and the ground is recorded.
Higher the distance is, the better it is.
|
At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
|
|
Range of motion of lumbar mobility
Time Frame: At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
|
Active range of motion of lumbar flexion and lumbar extension will be measured with two inclinometers.
Higher the score is, the better it is.
|
At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
|
|
Sub pelvis muscle flexibility.
Time Frame: At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
|
The sub pelvis muscle flexibility will be measured by goniometry and centimetry.
Higher the score is, the better it is.
|
At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
|
|
Quadriceps strength
Time Frame: At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
|
Testing will be done 90 degrees of knee flexion using a wall.
The maximum holding time will be determined with a chronometer (in seconds).
Higher the score is, the better it is.
|
At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
|
|
Endurance of trunk extensors
Time Frame: At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
|
Measured by the Sorensen-Biering Test (duration in seconds), higher the score is, the better it is.
|
At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
|
|
Endurance of trunk flexors
Time Frame: At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
|
Measured by the Shirado test (duration in seconds), higher the score is, the better it is.
|
At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
|
|
Anxiety and depression
Time Frame: At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
|
The Anxiety and depression are assessed by the self administered Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD).
It has 14 items from 0 to 3. 7 questions concern, depression and 7 anxiety.
The total for each scale is 21.
If the score is less than 7, there in no symptomatology.
|
At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
|
|
The kinesiophobia
Time Frame: At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
|
Assessment of the kinesiophobia index by the TAMPA questionnaire.
There are 17 questions, from 1 to 4. If the score is high (more than 40 on 68), the kinesiophobia is significant.
|
At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
|
|
Functional abilities
Time Frame: At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
|
Evaluation of the functional disability with the dallas pain questionnaire.
It's divided in 4 parts : impact on daily activities, impact on the relation between professional activities and leisure, impact on the relation between anxiety and depression and the impact on sociability.
The Dallas questionnaire evaluated the impact of pain from 0 (no impact) to 100% (maximum impact).
|
At the end of the rehabilitation and 3 month after.
|
|
Socio professional criteria
Time Frame: 3 months after the end of rehabilitation
|
The rate of patients having resumed a professional activity and condition of resumption (part-time therapeutic or not, previous position or adapted position).
|
3 months after the end of rehabilitation
|
|
Compliance
Time Frame: At the end of the rehabilitation
|
Self-assessment compliance evaluated by an adherence booklet
|
At the end of the rehabilitation
|
|
Acceptability
Time Frame: At the end of the rehabilitation program and 3 months after.
|
The acceptability will be assessed using a 18-item questionnaire based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model.
Each questions are based on a Likert-type 5 point scale ranging from : 1=In total disagreement, 2= Somewhat disagree, 3= Neither agree nor disagree, 4= Somewhat agree, 5=In total agreement.
|
At the end of the rehabilitation program and 3 months after.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jephté Houedakor, Pole Saint Helier
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2022-A00129-34
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.