A Clinical Study Comparing Postoperative Outcomes Between the TECNIS Intraocular Lens.

May 7, 2024 updated by: Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc.
This is a prospective, multi-center, masked, three-arm, randomized clinical study of the TECNIS Eyhance Toric II IOL (test #1) and TECNIS Synergy Toric II (test #2) compared to the TECNIS Toric 1-Piece IOL (control).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
35

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 91325
        • Shultz Chang Vision
      • Orange, California, United States, 92868
        • Coastal Vision
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94115
        • Pacific Eye Associates, A Medical Corporation
    • Hawaii
      • Honolulu, Hawaii, United States, 96817
        • Aloha Vision Consultants
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Parkhurst NuVision

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Eligible subjects will be enrolled based on surgeon's determination of meeting the minimum study criteria in one or both eyes:

  1. Male or female at least 22 years of age
  2. Have a cataract in one or both eyes, with planned phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation with a toric intraocular lens
  3. Regular corneal astigmatism and predicted postoperative residual astigmatism of less than 1.00 D after implantation with a toric intraocular lens in the study eye(s)
  4. Availability, willingness and sufficient cognitive awareness to understand the purpose of the examination procedures and comply with postoperative visits
  5. Signed informed consent and HIPAA authorization or equivalent documentation necessary to comply with applicable privacy laws pertaining to medical treatment in the governing countries.

Exclusion Criteria:

Eligible subjects will be enrolled based on surgeon's determination of meeting the minimum study criteria in one or both eyes:

  1. Best-corrected distance visual acuity better than 20/40 Snellen (0.3 logMAR)
  2. Potential visual acuity estimated to be worse than 20/32 Snellen (0.2 logMAR)
  3. Prior corneal refractive (LASIK, LASEK, RK, PRK, etc.) or intraocular surgery, Including prophylactic peripheral iridotomies and peripheral laser retinal repairs
  4. Corneal abnormalities such as stromal, epithelial or endothelial dystrophies (e.g., any observed guttata) that are predicted to cause visual acuity losses to a level worse than 20/30 Snellen during the study
  5. Pupil abnormalities (non-reactive, fixed pupils, or abnormally shaped pupils) or unable to dilate to visualize IOL axis (approximately 6.0 mm)
  6. Inability to achieve keratometric stability for contact lens wearers (as defined in Section 10.3 Preoperative Procedures)
  7. Recent ocular trauma or ocular surgery that is not resolved/stable or may affect visual outcomes or increase risk to the subject
  8. Use of systemic or ocular medications that may affect vision
  9. Prior, current, or anticipated use during the course of the 6-month study of tamsulosin or silodosin (e.g., Flomax, Flomaxtra, Rapaflo) that may, in the opinion of the investigator, confound the outcome or increase the risk to the subject (e.g., poor dilation or a lack of adequate iris structure to perform standard cataract surgery)
  10. Poorly controlled diabetes
  11. Acute, chronic, or uncontrolled systemic or ocular disease or illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, would increase the operative risk or confound the outcome(s) of the study (e.g., immunocompromised, connective tissue disease, suspected glaucoma, glaucomatous changes in the fundus or visual field, ocular inflammation, etc.). Note: controlled ocular hypertension without glaucomatous changes (optic nerve cupping and visual field loss) is acceptable.
  12. Pregnancy, planned pregnancy, presently lactating, or another condition associated with hormonal fluctuation that could lead to refractive changes
  13. Concurrent participation or participation in any other clinical study within 30 days prior to the preoperative visit
  14. Any other systemic or ocular disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, may affect the patient's eligibility for the study, affect visual acuity or may require surgical intervention during the study (e.g., macular degeneration, cystoid macular edema, diabetic retinopathy, etc.).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Eyhance Toric II IOL
Model DIU
Device: Model DIU
Subjects will be randomized to a treatment group (masked) in ratio 1:1:1. Surgeons will perform standardized, small-incision, cataract surgery and implant the study lenses using a JJSV-validated insertion system qualified for use with the lens to be implanted.
Experimental: TECNIS Synergy Toric II
Model DFW
Device: Model DFW
Subjects will be randomized to a treatment group (masked) in ratio 1:1:1. Surgeons will perform standardized, small-incision, cataract surgery and implant the study lenses using a JJSV-validated insertion system qualified for use with the lens to be implanted.
Active Comparator: TECNIS Toric 1-Piece IOL
Model ZCT
Device: Model ZCT
Subjects will be randomized to a treatment group (masked) in ratio 1:1:1. Surgeons will perform standardized, small-incision, cataract surgery and implant the study lenses using a JJSV-validated insertion system qualified for use with the lens to be implanted.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rotational Stability of IOL
Time Frame: 1 month
The percentage of eyes with rotational stability of the IOL at postoperative 1 month.
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. Clinical Trial, Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 30, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 7, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 7, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 25, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 31, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 4, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 7, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • JJSV201EYST

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices Companies have an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health. Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA project site at http://yoda.yale.edu

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings