Image-based AI Predictive Biomarkers for Precision Neoadjuvant Triple-negative Breast Cancer Treatment (PEAR-TNBC)

July 25, 2025 updated by: Ourotech, Inc.

Prospective Evaluation of Image-based Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Tool for Precision Neoadjuvant Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treatment

Pear Bio has developed an organ-on-a-chip device together with a computer vision pipeline through which the response of an individual patient's tumor to different chemotherapy regimens can be tested simultaneously ex vivo. This study will recruit patients with early TNBC who are planned for standard of care neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. The oncologist will be blinded to the response on the Pear Bio tool (the assay will be run in parallel with the patient's neoadjuvant chemotherapy). The primary objective of this study is to establish the sensitivity and specificity of Pear Bio's test against patient outcomes (pathological complete response).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a multicenter, UK-based, observational pilot study that aims to determine the accuracy of a new assay, the Pear Bio tool, in predicting pathological complete response (pCR) in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early TNBC. Patients will undergo an additional, mandatory biopsy of the breast tumor before commencing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The biopsy sample will be run on the Pear Bio tool while the patient receives their standard of care neoadjuvant chemotherapy. As such, for this study, the result from the Pear Bio tool will not be used to inform the choice of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the treating oncologist will be blinded to the assay results. The pathological outcome from surgery (pCR vs non-pCR) will be collected and used to calculate the specificity of the assay as the primary endpoint of the study. Sensitivity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value will also be measured.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
34

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
      • London, United Kingdom, EC1A 7BE
        • Barts Health NHS Trust
      • London, United Kingdom
        • The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
      • Manchester, United Kingdom
        • Manchester University NHS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Early TNBC patients due to receive neoadjuvant therapy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able to give written informed consent prior to admission to this study.
  • Female or male aged ≥18 years.
  • Histologically confirmed invasive primary breast cancer which is triple-negative by the most recent ASCO/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines.
  • Stage I-III breast cancer planned for neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery.
  • Primary breast tumor size ≥10 mm. For patients with bilateral tumors both of the breast tumors have to be TNBC and at least one has to be ≥10 mm.
  • Willing to undergo a mandatory additional core needle biopsy from the primary breast mass prior to starting neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with bilateral breast cancer only need to have one tumor biopsied if both tumors are ≥10 mm.
  • Willing to donate 40mL of whole blood (cohort B only)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inflammatory breast cancer.
  • Inoperable or metastatic TNBC.
  • Patients who have already commenced neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
  • Treatment concurrently or within 4 weeks of commencing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with any experimental therapies. Patients who are due to receive standard of care neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the control arm of a trial may be eligible after discussion with the medical monitor.
  • Secretory or adenoid cystic histological subtypes of triple-negative breast cancer.
  • Any other disease, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding, or clinical laboratory finding that, in the investigator's opinion, gives reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition that may affect the interpretation of the results, render the patient at high risk from treatment complications or interferes with obtaining informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Early TNBC patient Cohort A

Early TNBC patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy and providing core needle biopsy.

Any approved neoadjuvant therapy can be used based on physician's choice.
Procedure: Core needle biopsy
An additional core needle biopsy is taken to run the Pear Bio test. Test results are not used to inform treatment. Approved neoadjuvant therapy regimens are given to the patient as per standard of care to observe response.
Early TNBC patient Cohort B

Early TNBC patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy and providing core needle biopsy and blood.

Any approved neoadjuvant therapy can be used based on physician's choice.
Procedure: Core needle biopsy
An additional core needle biopsy is taken to run the Pear Bio test. Test results are not used to inform treatment. Approved neoadjuvant therapy regimens are given to the patient as per standard of care to observe response.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pathological complete response correlation accuracy (specificity)
Time Frame: 6 months
The specificity of Pear image-based biomarkers are established against patient pathological complete response (evaluated on surgical sample post-neoadjuvant therapy).
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pathological complete response correlation accuracy (sensitivity)
Time Frame: 6 months
The sensitivity of Pear image-based biomarkers are established against patient pathological complete response (evaluated on surgical sample post-neoadjuvant therapy).
6 months
Pathological complete response correlation accuracy (positive predictive value)
Time Frame: 6 months
The positive predictive value of Pear image-based biomarkers are established against patient pathological complete response (evaluated on surgical sample post-neoadjuvant therapy).
6 months
Pathological complete response correlation accuracy (negative predictive value)
Time Frame: 6 months
The negative predictive value of Pear image-based biomarkers are established against patient pathological complete response (evaluated on surgical sample post-neoadjuvant therapy).
6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Culture success rate
Time Frame: 4 days
The percentage of patient samples successfully arriving at central lab with >100k live cells isolated and maintaining 70% cell viability after 4 days in culture with no treatment
4 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ourotech, Inc.

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Barts & The London NHS Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 6, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 25, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 25, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 22, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 22, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 28, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 25, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PEAR-TNBC_ Protocol_v2.0

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Pseudonymized data will be shared between study sites, such as treatment and outcome data for each patient. No publication will be made revealing individual patient data; only group-level data will be published.

Study Data/Documents

  1. Study Protocol

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings