Sensory Integration Disorders in Patients With MS Including Disease Advancement and Relapses in the Last Year
Sensory Integration Disorders in Multiple Sclerosis
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Unii Lubelskiej
-
Szczecin, Unii Lubelskiej, Poland, 71-228
- Departmen of Neurology
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- health of a person
- aged 30-45 years
- without diagnosed disorders of sensory integration and MS
Exclusion Criteria:
- diagnosed disorders of sensory integration
- diagnosed with Ms
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
people with MS
People with MS with relapsing-remitting form
|
In people with MS and people with health of similar age, a test was performed to assess sensory integration in adults
|
|
healthy people
people from the age of 30-45 years old
|
In people with MS and people with health of similar age, a test was performed to assess sensory integration in adults
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
sensory integration disorders and relapses in the last year
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Patients with MS were divided into two groups, with relapses in the last year and without relapses.
In each group, ters were performed to assess sensory integration in adults.
To study SI disorders, the Daniel Travis questionnaire was used to study SI disorders in people over 18 years of age based on the guidelines of the American Society of SI Disorders in Adults.
The following domains were distinguished: general sensory processing (OP, 9 items), sensory hypersensitivity (NS, 26 items), hypersensitivity / sensory exploration (PS, 20 items), sensory discrimination (DS, 26 items), motor skills (ZM, 19 items ) and socio-emotional disorders (SE, 22 items).
Each symptom was assessed by the participant on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (never occurred) to 4 (repeats regularly).
If the problem occurred in the past, the respondent entered the letter P. The sum obtained by adding values in each of the domains indicated the severity of SI disorders in a given domain.
|
1 year
|
|
Sensory integration disorders and the degree of disease severity
Time Frame: 1 Day
|
MS patients were divided into two groups with EDSS up to 2.5 points and below.
In both groups, sensory integration disorders were checked using a scale to assess sensoryintegration in adults.
To study SI disorders, the Daniel Travis questionnaire was used to study SI disorders in people over 18 years of age based on the guidelines of the American Society of SI Disorders in Adults.
The following domains were distinguished: general sensory processing (OP, 9 items), sensory hypersensitivity (NS, 26 items), hypersensitivity / sensory exploration (PS, 20 items), sensory discrimination (DS, 26 items), motor skills (ZM, 19 items ) and socio-emotional disorders (SE, 22 items).
Each symptom was assessed by the participant on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (never occurred) to 4 (repeats regularly).
If the problem occurred in the past, the respondent entered the letter P. The sum obtained by adding values in each of the domains indicated the severity of SI disorders in a given domain.
|
1 Day
|
|
Comparing the test group with the control group
Time Frame: 1 Day
|
The results of the scale tests were compared to the sensory integration test in the test group and the control group.
To study SI disorders, the Daniel Travis questionnaire was used to study SI disorders in people over 18 years of age based on the guidelines of the American Society of SI Disorders in Adults.
The following domains were distinguished: general sensory processing (OP, 9 items), sensory hypersensitivity (NS, 26 items), hypersensitivity / sensory exploration (PS, 20 items), sensory discrimination (DS, 26 items), motor skills (ZM, 19 items ) and socio-emotional disorders (SE, 22 items).
Each symptom was assessed by the participant on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (never occurred) to 4 (repeats regularly).
If the problem occurred in the past, the respondent entered the letter P. The sum obtained by adding values in each of the domains indicated the severity of SI disorders in a given domain.
|
1 Day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Wioletta Pawlukowska, dr hab., Department of Neurology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- PUM
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.