Testing Implementation Strategies to Improve Delivery of PrEP for Pregnant and Postpartum Women in Kenya (PrEPARE)
Testing Implementation Strategies to Improve Delivery of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for Pregnant and Postpartum Women in Kenya (K01)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Anjuli Wagner, PhD
- Phone Number: 9784602331
- Email: anjuliw@uw.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Julia Dettinger, MPH
- Phone Number: 206-221-1041
- Email: jcdettin@uw.edu
Study Locations
-
-
-
Homa Bay, Kenya
- Ober Health Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women receiving Maternal and Child Health (MCH) services HCW participating in satisfaction surveys
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unwilling or unable to provide informed consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Package 1
Package 1: Three implementation strategies including fast tracking, provider re-training, and dispensing PrEP in MCH
|
There were three bundles of strategies tested determined based on the qualitative information gathered in Aim 1 by stakeholders
|
|
No Intervention: Comparator for Package 1
4 facilities were assigned to the comparator group and never received any implementation strategy.
|
|
|
Experimental: Package 2
Package 2: Three implementation strategies including task shifting PrEP counseling from clinicians/nurses to HIV testing services providers (HTS), training different cadres, and dispensing PrEP in MCH
|
There were three bundles of strategies tested determined based on the qualitative information gathered in Aim 1 by stakeholders
|
|
Experimental: Package 3
Package 3: Three implementation strategies including use of PrEP educational materials, PrEP health talks in waiting bays and dispensing PrEP in MCH
|
There were three bundles of strategies tested determined based on the qualitative information gathered in Aim 1 by stakeholders
|
|
No Intervention: Comparison for Package 2
4 facilities were assigned to the comparator group and never received any implementation strategy.
|
|
|
No Intervention: Comparison for Package 3
4 facilities were assigned to the comparator group and never received any implementation strategy.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Waiting Time
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Time (minutes) spent waiting to receive services
|
6 months
|
|
HCW Acceptability
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Total on 4 item Acceptability of Intervention Measures (AIM) score, 1 (Completely disagree) to 5 (Completely Agree) Likert scale.
The minimum score on the 4 items is 4 points (scoring 1 on each of the 4 items) while the maximum is 20 points (scoring 5 on each of the 4 items).
A higher score indicates a better outcome.
The sub-scores on each of the 4 items are summed.
|
6 months
|
|
Health Care Worker (HCW) Appropriateness
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Total on 4 item Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) score, 1 (Completely disagree) to 5 (Completely Agree) Likert scale.
The minimum score on the 4 items is 4 points (scoring 1 on each of the 4 items) while the maximum is 20 points (scoring 5 on each of the 4 items).
A higher score indicates a better outcome.
The sub-scores on each of the 4 items are summed.
|
6 months
|
|
Change in PrEP Penetration
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Proportion of women who are screened for PrEP / total women receiving antenatal or postnatal services
|
6 months
|
|
Change in PrEP Fidelity
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Proportion of women who receive all PrEP specific steps in a visit: HIV testing, HIV risk screening, PrEP counseling.
Assessed among the subset of women who are due for an HIV test, as per Kenyan guidelines, which is a subset of the overall sample.
|
6 months
|
|
Timeliness of Services
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Time (minutes) spent receiving services from health care workers
|
6 months
|
|
Client Satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Total on 7 item exit survey of clients to assess their satisfaction with services received at the facility, 1 (worse) to 4 (better) scale.
The minimum score on the 7 items is 7 points (scoring 1 on each of the 7 items) while the maximum is 24 points (scoring 4 on each of the 7 items).
A higher score indicates a better outcome.
The sub-scores on each of the 4 items are summed.
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
PrEP Uptake
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Proportion of women who accept PrEP among those offered
|
6 months
|
|
PrEP Continuation
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Proportion of women who present for a refill among those initially prescribed PrEP
|
6 months
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Proportion of women who have >80 percent adherence to PrEP by pill count among those initially prescribed PrEP
|
6 months
|
|
PrEP Efficiency
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Patient flow mapping to identify more efficient client flows with fewer transitions between physical spaces and providers
|
6 months
|
|
Client PrEP Knowledge
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Number of participants with perfect knowledge on PrEP information questions based on content covered in counseling sessions
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Anjuli Wagner, PhD, University of Washington
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Blood-Borne Infections
- Urogenital Diseases
- Genital Diseases
- Immune System Diseases
- Infections
- RNA Virus Infections
- Virus Diseases
- Communicable Diseases
- Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral
- Sexually Transmitted Diseases
- Lentivirus Infections
- Retroviridae Infections
- Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes
- HIV Infections
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00008392-A
- K01MH121124 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.