Bipolar Coagulation Versus Suture Renorrhaphy in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy
Bipolar Coagulation Versus Suture Renorrhaphy for Hemostasis of Tumour Bed in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Prospective Randomized Comparative Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Qalubia
-
Banhā, Qalubia, Egypt, 013
- Mohamed Kadry Mostafa
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Radiological diagnosis of renal mass less than 7cm
- Renal mass in patients with chronic kidney disease
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with Central or hilar renal masses
- Renal masses close to pelvi-calyceal system
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: group (A) included 30 cases in which we used bipolar coagulation for hemostasis
|
Operations were done under general anesthesia.
Patients were positioned in modified lateral kidney position for trans-peritoneal procedures.
Pneumoperitoneum using the Veress needle technique and trocar placement .
Dissection to the renal hilum for good and sufficient exposure of the renal vessels.
Good exposure of the tumor and marking the excision site with electro cautery.
Clamping of renal vessels using laparoscopic Bulldog appliers.
Excision of the renal mass using visual assessment to determine the suitable depth of normal parenchyma to be excised in order to achieve a negative surgical margin.
Unclamping was done and re-assessment of the hemostasis to secure residual bleeding points.
Approximation of the edges of renal parenchyma using suturing in both groups.
The specimen was placed in an EndoCatch bag and removed through pfannenstiel incisionsurgical drain was placed in the paracolic gutter
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: group (B) included 30 cases in which we used suture renorrhaphy
|
Operations were done under general anesthesia.
Patients were positioned in modified lateral kidney position for trans-peritoneal procedures.
Pneumoperitoneum using the Veress needle technique and trocar placement .
Dissection to the renal hilum for good and sufficient exposure of the renal vessels.
Good exposure of the tumor and marking the excision site with electro cautery.
Clamping of renal vessels using laparoscopic Bulldog appliers.
Excision of the renal mass using visual assessment to determine the suitable depth of normal parenchyma to be excised in order to achieve a negative surgical margin.
Unclamping was done and re-assessment of the hemostasis to secure residual bleeding points.
Approximation of the edges of renal parenchyma using suturing in both groups.
The specimen was placed in an EndoCatch bag and removed through pfannenstiel incisionsurgical drain was placed in the paracolic gutter
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
To compare between bipolar coagulation of tumor bed in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus suture renorrhaphy
Time Frame: baseline frame
|
patients were assessed preoperative by weight in kg and height in meters weight and height will be combined to report body mass index in kg/m^2 ,base line creatinine in mil gm ,baseline hemoglobin in gm,leterality ,CT to examine size in cm and RENAL score and asses patients intra operative by operative time in minutes ,ischemic time in minutes ,estimated blood loss in gm and hospital stay in days
|
baseline frame
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: mostafa khalil, MD, Data analysis
- Principal Investigator: Ali Abdelkarim, MD, data collections
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Msezane LP, Katz MH, Gofrit ON, Shalhav AL, Zorn KC. Hemostatic agents and instruments in laparoscopic renal surgery. J Endourol. 2008 Mar;22(3):403-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.9844.
- Aron M, Gill IS. Minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery (MINSS) for renal tumours part I: laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol. 2007 Feb;51(2):337-46; discussion 46-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.018. Epub 2006 Oct 20.
- Zhang C, Xu Y, Zhang Z, Qiao B, Yang K, Liu R, Ma B. Laparoscopic simple enucleation and coagulation on tumor bed using argon beam coagulator for treating small renal cell carcinomas: an animal study followed by clinical application. Med Sci Monit. 2012 May;18(5):BR193-7. doi: 10.12659/msm.882729.
- Harbin, A. C, Giusto, L, Lee, V. S., Nadhan, K., Mooney, J., & Eun, D. D. The Use of Argon Beam Coagulation During Robotic Partial Nephrectomy in an Animal Model. Videourology. (2015).
- Garcia-Segui A, Bercowsky E, Gascon-Mir M. [Simplified renorrhaphy using self-retaining barbed suture during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy]. Actas Urol Esp. 2012 Sep;36(8):497-502. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2012.04.001. Epub 2012 Jul 20. Spanish.
- Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, Blute ML, Chow GK, Derweesh IH, Faraday MM, Kaouk JH, Leveillee RJ, Matin SF, Russo P, Uzzo RG; Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Urological Association. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol. 2009 Oct;182(4):1271-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.004. Epub 2009 Aug 14. No abstract available.
- Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol. 2009 Sep;182(3):844-53. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.035. Epub 2009 Jul 17.
- Moinzadeh A, Gill IS, Rubenstein M, Ukimura O, Aron M, Spaliviero M, Nahen K, Finelli A, Magi-Galluzzi C, Desai M, Kaouk J, Ulchaker JC. Potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without hilar clamping in the survival calf model. J Urol. 2005 Sep;174(3):1110-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000168620.36893.6c.
- Harmon WJ, Kavoussi LR, Bishoff JT. Laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for solid renal masses using the ultrasonic shears. Urology. 2000 Nov 1;56(5):754-9. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00766-4.
- Desai MM, Gill IS, Ramani AP, Spaliviero M, Rybicki L, Kaouk JH. The impact of warm ischaemia on renal function after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int. 2005 Feb;95(3):377-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05304.x.
- Zhao PT, Richstone L, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Int J Surg. 2016 Dec;36(Pt C):548-553. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.04.028. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
- Ota T, Komori H, Rii J, Ochi A, Suzuki K, Shiga N, Nishiyama H. Soft coagulation in partial nephrectomy without renorrhaphy: feasibility of a new technique and early outcomes. Int J Urol. 2014 Mar;21(3):244-7. doi: 10.1111/iju.12276. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
- Kim DK, Kim LH, Raheem AA, Shin TY, Alabdulaali I, Yoon YE, Han WK, Rha KH. Comparison of Trifecta and Pentafecta Outcomes between T1a and T1b Renal Masses following Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) with Minimum One Year Follow Up: Can RAPN for T1b Renal Masses Be Feasible? PLoS One. 2016 Mar 17;11(3):e0151738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151738. eCollection 2016.
- Ramani AP, Desai MM, Steinberg AP, Ng CS, Abreu SC, Kaouk JH, Finelli A, Novick AC, Gill IS. Complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 200 cases. J Urol. 2005 Jan;173(1):42-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000147177.20458.73.
- Takagi T, Kondo T, Omae K, Iizuka J, Kobayashi H, Yoshida K, Hashimoto Y, Tanabe K. Assessment of Surgical Outcomes of the Non-renorrhaphy Technique in Open Partial Nephrectomy for >/=T1b Renal Tumors. Urology. 2015 Sep;86(3):529-33. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.05.018. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
- Marszalek M, Chromecki T, Al-Ali BM, Meixl H, Madersbacher S, Jeschke K, Pummer K, Zigeuner R. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of the transperitoneal versus the retroperitoneal approach. Urology. 2011 Jan;77(1):109-13. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.02.057.
- Williams SB, Kacker R, Alemozaffar M, Francisco IS, Mechaber J, Wagner AA. Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a single laparoscopic trained surgeon's experience in the development of a robotic partial nephrectomy program. World J Urol. 2013 Aug;31(4):793-8. doi: 10.1007/s00345-011-0648-5. Epub 2011 Jan 29.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Lap in partial nephrectomy
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.