Predictive Value of Human Microbiome and Serological Markers for Clinical Outcome of Cerebral Hemorrhage

September 21, 2022 updated by: Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University
Objective: To explore the predictive value of characteristic disorder of intestinal flora for clinical prognosis in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Secondary objectives: 1) To investigate the correlation of gut microbiota and its serological indicators with imaging features and clinical neurological deficits in ICH; 2) Dynamically observe the changes of human microbiome and its serological indicators after ICH, and explore the biomarkers based on human microbiome related to disease changes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage has brought a heavy burden to society and families. Finding biomarkers closely related to the condition of intracerebral hemorrhage is an important research direction for the prevention and treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage. However, there are few studies on the correlation between cerebral hemorrhage and microbiota. Our previous small sample study found that there were intestinal flora and SCFAs metabolism disorders in patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage, and the latter was significantly related to poor prognosis. These results suggest that gut microbiota and its metabolites may become prognostic predictors and therapeutic targets for patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. However, more research evidence is still needed to confirm. Therefore, this study hypothesized that oral or intestinal flora in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage has a certain degree of disorder and dynamic changes, accompanied by changes in serum markers, and there is a potential relationship between the changes of some microbiota-related markers and the severity and outcome of cerebral hemorrhage. Therefore, this topic proposed collection in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage oral swabs, blood and feces or anal swab specimens, evaluate the neurological function score, imaging features and clinical outcomes, and to establish a follow-up queue, the dynamic change of cerebral hemorrhage patients after intestinal bacterial flora and condition and poor prognosis, the correlation of biomarkers new prediction and prevention of brain hemorrhage, To improve the effectiveness of prevention and treatment of cerebral hemorrhage.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, Nanfang Hospital
        • Recruiting
        • JIA YIN

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Acute hemorrhagic stroke

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. It meets the diagnostic criteria for acute ischemic stroke
  2. Age ≥ 18 years
  3. The onset time is less than or equal to 2 weeks
  4. Diagnosis of cancer before stroke onset or during hospitalization and active cancer (failure to meet clinical criteria for cure, or discovery of recurrence or metastasis)
  5. Sign an informed consent form, provide relevant medical history information and provide biological specimens

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous history of disabling stroke (pre-onset mRS ≥2)
  2. Primary central nervous system tumor or hematologic system tumor
  3. The cancer meets the criteria for clinical cure and has not recurred or metastasized for more than 5 years
  4. Antibiotics, prebiotics/probiotics taken within 1 month
  5. Patients who cannot have stool specimens within 4 days of admission

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Acute cerebral hemorrhage
intestinal flora disturbance To observe the clinical prognosis of acute cerebral hemorrhage after enterobacterial disorder
Other: intestinal flora disturbance
To observe the clinical prognosis of acute cerebral hemorrhage after enterobacterial disorder
The group without stroke

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neurological function score (mRS score)
Time Frame: 3 months after onset
Neurological function score (mRS score)
3 months after onset
mortality
Time Frame: within 12 months after onset
mortality
within 12 months after onset

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
New cerebrovascular events
Time Frame: within 12 months after onset
Occurrence of ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke
within 12 months after onset
NIHSS
Time Frame: The first day and the seventh day after admission, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after onset
NIHSS
The first day and the seventh day after admission, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after onset
Barthel Index
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after onset
BI
3 months, 6 months and 12 months after onset
Mini-mental State Examination
Time Frame: The first day and the seventh day after admission, 3 months and 6 months after onset
MMSE
The first day and the seventh day after admission, 3 months and 6 months after onset
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Time Frame: The first day and the seventh day after admission、3 months and 6 months after onset
MOCA
The first day and the seventh day after admission、3 months and 6 months after onset

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 14, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2025

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 13, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 21, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 23, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 23, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 21, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NFEC-2022-168

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings