Maximizing Visual Outcomes With Eyhance IOLs

May 22, 2025 updated by: Berkeley Eye Center
This is a non-interventional prospective, single center, bilateral, non-randomized, open-label, observational clinical study. All patients will have had bilateral implantation of an Eyhance IOL at the time of cataract surgery. These patients will then be compared to assess which patient biometric properties (such as spherical aberration, q value, pupil size, etc.) lead to an overall increase in near or intermediate vision as well as overall patient satisfaction.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a non-interventional prospective, single center, bilateral, non-randomized, open-label, observational clinical study. All patients will have had bilateral implantation of an Eyhance IOL at the time of cataract surgery. These patients will then be assessed in the 1-6-month post-operative period. Patients will be grouped into two arms: "distance with minimal intermediate" and "distance with enhanced intermediate/near" based on mean photopic binocular BCDVA and DCIVA (at 66 cm) of patients with bilateral Eyhance IOLs corrected to plano sphere. The "distance with minimal intermediate" group is defined by BCDVA of 0.1 logMAR or better but a DCIVA of 0.4 logMAR or worse. The "distance with enhanced intermediate/near" is defined by BCDVA of 0.1 logMAR or better and a DCIVA of 0.3 logMAR or better. In addition to binocular BCDVA and DCIVA, monocular measurements will be obtained as well. The two groups will be compared to assess which patient biometric properties (such as spherical aberration, q value, pupil size, etc.) lead to an overall increase in near or intermediate vision as well as overall patient satisfaction. Biometric data will be obtained from the Zeiss IOL Master 700, Atlas 9000, and the iTrace.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
110

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77027
        • Berkeley Eye Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

36 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with healthy eyes and uncomplicated bilateral implantation of Eyhance IOLs.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults, 40 years of age having already undergone uncomplicated cataract removal by phacoemulsification with a clear corneal incision in both eyes.
  2. Implantation of bilateral Eyhance IOLs (DIB00/DIU***).
  3. Able to comprehend and willing to sign informed consent and complete all required testing procedures.
  4. Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) projected to be 0.10 logMAR (Minimum Angle of Resolution) or better.
  5. Clear intraocular media.
  6. Minimum of two weeks post YAG capsulotomy to treat PCO

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any corneal abnormality, other than regular corneal astigmatism (as determined by pre-operative testing) that in the opinion of the investigator would confound the outcome(s) of the study.
  2. Any complication during cataract surgery (capsular tear, vitrectomy, etc.).
  3. History of or current retinal conditions or predisposition to retinal conditions.
  4. Amblyopia or strabismus in either eye.
  5. History of or current anterior or posterior segment inflammation of any etiology.
  6. Any form of neovascularization on or within the eye.
  7. Glaucoma (uncontrolled or controlled with medication).
  8. Optic nerve atrophy.
  9. Subjects with diagnosed degenerative eye disorders.
  10. Postoperative CDVA worse than 0.10 logMAR (20/25 snellen).
  11. Subjects who have an acute or chronic disease or illness that would confound the results of this investigation in the opinion of the investigator (e.g. immunocompromised, connective tissue disease, clinically significant atopic disease, etc.).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Distance with Minimal Intermediate Visual Acuity Group
Patients with bilateral implantation of Eyhance IOLs. And defined by BCDVA of 0.1 logMAR or better but a DCIVA of 0.4 logMAR or worse.
Diagnostic test: Visual Acuity
Measurement of distance, intermediate and near visual acuity.
Diagnostic test: Biometric Data Collection
Measurement of biometric data will be obtained from the Zeiss IOL Master 700, Atlas 9000, and the iTrace.
Other: Patient Questionnaire
Patients will complete a Patient Questionnaire to determine their level of spectacle independence and visual acuity satisfaction.
Distance with Enhanced Intermediate/Near Visual Acuity Group
Patients with bilateral implantation of Eyhance IOLS. And defined by BCDVA of 0.1 logMAR or better and a DCIVA of 0.3 logMAR or better.
Diagnostic test: Visual Acuity
Measurement of distance, intermediate and near visual acuity.
Diagnostic test: Biometric Data Collection
Measurement of biometric data will be obtained from the Zeiss IOL Master 700, Atlas 9000, and the iTrace.
Other: Patient Questionnaire
Patients will complete a Patient Questionnaire to determine their level of spectacle independence and visual acuity satisfaction.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of Two Groups Categorized by "Distance With Minimal Intermediate" and "Distance With Enhanced Intermediate/Near" Based on Mean Photopic Binocular BCDVA of Patients With Bilateral Eyhance IOLs Corrected to Plano Sphere.
Time Frame: 1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative)
To compare two groups categorized by "distance with minimal intermediate" and "distance with enhanced intermediate/near" based on mean photopic binocular BCDVA of patients with bilateral Eyhance IOLs targeted corrected at plano sphere.
1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative)
Comparison of Two Groups Categorized by "Distance With Minimal Intermediate" and "Distance With Enhanced Intermediate/Near" Based on Mean Photopic Binocular DCIVA (at 66 cm) of Patients With Bilateral Eyhance IOLs Corrected to Plano Sphere.
Time Frame: 1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative)
To compare two groups categorized by "distance with minimal intermediate" and "distance with enhanced intermediate/near" based on mean photopic binocular DCIVA (66 cm) of patients with bilateral Eyhance IOLs targeted corrected at plano sphere.
1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determine if Any Statistically Significant Differences in Pupil Size Exists Between the Two Groups.
Time Frame: 1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative)
To determine if any statistically significant differences in pupil size exists between the two groups that may allow for pre-operative recognition of those patients who could have enhanced benefits of the Eyhance IOL. This will require multiple regression analysis given the large number of variables.
1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative)
Spherical Aberration Between Groups
Time Frame: 1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative)
1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative)
Q Value Between Groups.
Time Frame: 1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative)

Q-value is an assessment of corneal asphericity.

  • A value of 0 indicates a cornea that is perfectly spherical
  • A value between -1 and 0 indicates a cornea that is shaped more like a football
  • A value between 0 and 1 indicates a cornea that is shaped more like a dish
1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative)
Biometric Data (Anterior Chamber Depth and Axial Length) Between Groups.
Time Frame: 1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative)
To determine if any statistically significant differences in biometric data exists between the two groups that may allow for pre-operative recognition of those patients who could have enhanced benefits of the Eyhance IOL. This will require multiple regression analysis given the large number of variables.
1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative)

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of a Patient Satisfaction Survey Between the Two Groups to Assess for Subjective Differences in Everyday Life. Patient's Answers Will be on a Scale Between Always and Never, Where Never Shows a Better Patient Outcome.
Time Frame: 1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative)
Comparison of a patient satisfaction survey between the two groups to assess for subjective differences in everyday life to determine if the enhanced vision plays a statistically significant difference in patient's perceived quality of vision or quality of life. Patient's answers will be on a scale between always and never, where never shows a better patient outcome.
1 day (between a minimum of 3 weeks postoperative up to 26 weeks post-operative)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Berkeley Eye Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Morgan Micheletti, MD, Berkeley Eye Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 7, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 7, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 7, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 12, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 9, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 23, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 22, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • JMM-1261

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings