Carvedilol vs. Propranolol in Second Prophylaxis of Variceal Bleeding

December 14, 2022 updated by: luo xuefeng, West China Hospital

Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effectiveness and Safety of Carvedilol vs. Propranolol Combined With Endoscopic Treatment in Second Prophylaxis of Variceal Bleeding in Cirrhosis

This randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of carvedilol versus propranolol, combined with routine endoscopic treatment, in the secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Non-selective beta blockers combined with endoscopic variceal band ligation (EVL) is the most effective methods for the prevention of variceal bleeding. Carvedilol has emerged as the preferred NSBB for treating portal hypertension in compensated cirrhosis due to strong evidence demonstrating that it has a more pronounced effect than propranolol to reduce the hepatic vein pressure gradient (HVPG), together with good patient acceptability and safety profile. However, No data from prospectively designed trials are available on the efficacy of carvedilol in the secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of carvedilol compared to propranolol as secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. All cirrhotic patients with at least one episode of variceal bleeding were included and randomized to the carvedilol or propranolol groups. EVL protocol was routinely performed in both groups. Variceal rebleeding, further decompensation, liver-related death, and overall survival was the outcomes of this trial.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
160

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between 18 and 80 years old;
  • With liver cirrhosis diagnosed by previous biopsy or by clinical criteria, and analytical image;
  • At least 5 days after index variceal bleeding;
  • Informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate in the study;
  • Portal hypertension resulting from other causes than liver cirrhosis;
  • More than 42 days after index variceal bleeding;
  • Bleeding from cardiofundal gastric varices;
  • Portal venous thrombosis >50% of the portal vein trunk;
  • Contraindications to beta-blockers (asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrioventricular block, heart failure, bradycardia with HR ≤40 bpm, arteria hypotension with systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, peripheral arterial disease, uncontrolled diabetes);
  • Prior NSBB+EVL combined treatment, TIPS implantation or surgical shunt as secondary prophylaxis of variceal bledding;
  • Chronic kidney disease;
  • Pregnancy or lactation;
  • Neoplastic disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Carvedilol
Carvedilol is started at a dose of 6.25mg/d, and titrated to a maximum dose of 12.5mg/d. Doses are increased 3 days later. Avoid systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg.
Drug: Carvedilol
Carvedilol is started at a dose of 6.25mg/d, and titrated to a maximum dose of 12.5mg/d. Doses are increased 3 days later. Avoid systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg.
Other Names:
  • carvedilol as the nonselective beta-blockers
Active Comparator: Propranolol
Propranolol is started at a dose of 20 mg/d and the dose will be increased by 10 mg twice a day steps every 2-3 days until the target (heart rate: 55~60 bpm) or to a maximum dose of 160 mg/d. Systolic arterial pressure is not less than 90 mm Hg and heart rate is not less than 50 bpm.
Drug: Propranolol
Propranolol is started at a dose of 20 mg/d and the dose will be increased by 10 mg twice a day steps every 2-3 days until the target (heart rate: 55~60 bpm) or to a maximum dose of 160 mg/d. Systolic arterial pressure is not less than 90 mm Hg and heart rate is not less than 50 bpm.
Other Names:
  • propranolol as the nonselective beta-blockers

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Variceal rebleeding rate
Time Frame: 1 year
Acute variceal rebleeding rate at 1 year
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Further decompensation rate
Time Frame: 1 year
This is a composite outcome that refers to rate of all further liver decompensation events at 1 year, including variceal rebleeding, recurrent or developement of ascites (grade≥2), overt hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, acute kidney injury, acute-on-chronic liver failure, and liver-related death.
1 year
Adverse events
Time Frame: 1 year
Hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg), development of acute kidney injury/ hepatorenal syndrome, hyponatremia, weakness, shortness of breath, dizziness, gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, constipation), or sexual and erectile dysfunction.
1 year
Transplant-free survival rate
Time Frame: 1 year
The transplant-free survival rate at 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
West China Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Chengdu Shangjin Nanfu Hospital
West China Tianfu Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Xuefeng Luo, M.D., West China Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 14, 2022

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 15, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 14, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NSBB-RVB

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings