Dexmedetomidine-Ropivacine Versus Sufentanil-Ropivacaine for Epidural Labor Analgesia
Effect of Dexmedetomidine Plus Ropivacaine Versus Sufentanil Plus Ropivacaine for Epidural Labor Analgesia on Neonatal Outcomes: a Pilot Randomized Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Sufentanil combined with ropivacaine is commonly used for epidural labor anesthesia. However, this combination is associated with some adverse events including increased risk of neonatal depression. Dexmedetomidine is a high selective alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist and possesses opioid-sparing and analgesic effects when used in combination with local anesthetics. Recently published data suggest that dexmedetomidine-ropivacaine combination can effectively relieve labor pain.
We suppose that, when compared with traditional sufentanil-ropivacaine combination, the dexmedetomidine-ropivacaine combination used for epidural labor analgesia may reduce sufentanil-related adverse neonatal outcomes. The purpose of this pilot trial is to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine-ropivacaine combination versus sufentanil-ropivacaine combination used for epidural labor analgesia on neonatal outcomes, and also to test the feasibility of a future large randomized trial.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Dong-Xin Wang, MD,PhD
- Phone Number: 86-10-83572784
- Email: wangdongxin@hotmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Chun-Mei Deng, MD
- Phone Number: 86-10-83573218
- Email: amychunmei@126.com
Study Locations
-
-
Bejing
-
Beijin, Bejing, China, 100034
- Peking University First Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 18-45 years;
- Single term pregnancy with vertex presentation planning vaginal delivery;
- Planning to receive epidural labor analgesia.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of contraindications to epidural analgesia, which includes: (1) History of infectious disease of the central nervous system (poliomyelitis, cerebrospinal meningitis, encephalitis, etc.); (2) History of spinal or intra-spinal disease (trauma or surgery of spinal column, intra-spinal canal mass, etc.); (3) Systemic infection (sepsis); (4) Skin or soft tissue infection at the site of epidural puncture; (5) Coagulopathy.
- Existence of bradycardia (heart rate <60 bpm), hypotension (SBP <90 mmHg) or severe hypertension (SBP ≥180mmHg), uncontrolled systemic comorbidities (i.e., diabetes or hepatic, renal or cardiac disease), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status ≥3.
- History of psychiatric disease or epilepsia.
- Allergy to study agents.
- Other conditions that are considered unsuitable for study participation.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Dexmedetomidine
loading dose of 0.45 microgram/ml dexmedetomidine plus 0.09% ropivacaine, maintenance dose of 0.36 microgram/ml dexmedetomidine plus 0.07% ropivacaine
|
loading dose of 0.45 microgram/ml dexmedetomidine plus 0.09% ropivacaine, maintenance dose of 0.36 microgram/ml dexmedetomidine plus 0.07% ropivacaine.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Sufentanil
loading dose of 0.45 microgram/ml sufentanil plus 0.09% ropivacaine, maintenance dose of 0.36 microgram/ml sufentanil plus 0.07% ropivacaine
|
loading dose of 0.45 microgram/ml sufentanil plus 0.09% ropivacaine, maintenance dose of 0.36 microgram/ml sufentanil plus 0.07% ropivacaine.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Composite neonatal morbidity
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours after birth
|
Included any of the following: 1-min or 5-min Apgar score less than 7, umbilical cord arterial PH less than 7.1, requirement for immediate assisted ventilation, neonatal intensive care unit or neonatal ward admission within 24 hours after birth.
|
Up to 24 hours after birth
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Delivery mode
Time Frame: At the time of delivery
|
The mode of delivery includes spontaneous delivery, instrumental delivery, and Cesarean delivery.
|
At the time of delivery
|
|
Duration of labor
Time Frame: From the begining of the first stage of labor until delivery of the placenta, up to 20 hours
|
Durations of the first, second, and third stages of labor
|
From the begining of the first stage of labor until delivery of the placenta, up to 20 hours
|
|
Epidural infusion volume
Time Frame: From the begining of epidural analgesia until childbirth, up to 20 hours
|
Total epidural infusion volume and epidural infusion volume per hour
|
From the begining of epidural analgesia until childbirth, up to 20 hours
|
|
Subjective sleep quality score at the first night after childbirth
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours after childbirth
|
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score of subjective sleep quality
|
Up to 24 hours after childbirth
|
|
The depression score assessed by Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)
Time Frame: At 42 days after childbirth
|
The depression will be assessed with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS; score range 0-30, with higher score indicating more severe depression).
The assessment will be conducted by a telephone interview.
A score of EPDS ≥10 was set as the threshold of postpartum depression.
|
At 42 days after childbirth
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Dong-Xin Wang, MD, PhD, Peking University First Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Lee AI, McCarthy RJ, Toledo P, Jones MJ, White N, Wong CA. Epidural Labor Analgesia-Fentanyl Dose and Breastfeeding Success: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesthesiology. 2017 Oct;127(4):614-624. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001793.
- Armstrong S, Fernando R. Side Effects and Efficacy of Neuraxial Opioids in Pregnant Patients at Delivery: A Comprehensive Review. Drug Saf. 2016 May;39(5):381-99. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0386-5.
- Hussain N, Grzywacz VP, Ferreri CA, Atrey A, Banfield L, Shaparin N, Vydyanathan A. Investigating the Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Local Anesthesia in Brachial Plexus Block: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 18 Randomized Controlled Trials. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Mar/Apr;42(2):184-196. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000564.
- Hetta DF, Fares KM, Abedalmohsen AM, Abdel-Wahab AH, Elfadl GMA, Ali WN. Epidural dexmedetomidine infusion for perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery: randomized trial. J Pain Res. 2018 Oct 30;11:2675-2685. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S163975. eCollection 2018.
- Qian M, Gao F, Liu J, Xu P. Dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl as adjuvants to ropivacaine for epidural anaesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pract. 2021 May;75(5):e13772. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13772. Epub 2020 Dec 20.
- Zhang X, Wang D, Shi M, Luo Y. Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant in Epidural Analgesia and Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Clin Drug Investig. 2017 Apr;37(4):343-354. doi: 10.1007/s40261-016-0477-9.
- Liu L, Drzymalski D, Xu W, Zhang W, Wang L, Xiao F. Dose dependent reduction in median effective concentration (EC50) of ropivacaine with adjuvant dexmedetomidine in labor epidural analgesia: An up-down sequential allocation study. J Clin Anesth. 2021 Feb;68:110115. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110115. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Adrenergic Agents
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Analgesics
- Sensory System Agents
- Anesthetics, Intravenous
- Anesthetics, General
- Anesthetics
- Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
- Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists
- Adrenergic alpha-Agonists
- Adrenergic Agonists
- Analgesics, Opioid
- Narcotics
- Hypnotics and Sedatives
- Adjuvants, Anesthesia
- Anesthetics, Local
- Dexmedetomidine
- Ropivacaine
- Sufentanil
- Dsuvia
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2022-368
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.