Decoding the Cognitive Trajectory of Hong Kong SuperAgers: a Longitudinal Follow-up Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Candy Wong
- Phone Number: 85226076063
- Email: candy.wong@cuhk.edu.hk
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Hanna LU, PhD
- Phone Number: 85226076063
- Email: hannalu@cuhk.edu.hk
Study Locations
-
-
-
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- Recruiting
- Tai Po Hospital
-
Contact:
- Candy Wong
- Phone Number: 85226076063
- Email: candy.wong@cuhk.edu.hk
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- SuperAgers are determined by the scores of global cognitive function. This ensured that the participants are divided by a measure relevant to the current study without directly biasing the results toward the domain of interest;
- Normal aging: the cases with the scores of cognitive performance within 1.5 standard deviation (SD) of age and education matched normative values derived from our cohort study, of which presented with HK MoCA score greater than 26 and CDR score equal to 0;
- NCD patients are defined as: evidence of modest decline in one or more cognitive domains, which is set as ≥ 1.5 SD below the age- and education-adjusted normative scores; no interference with independence in everyday activities; and no comorbid major psychiatric disorders.
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of bipolar disorders or psychosis;
- History of major neurological deficits including stroke, transient ischemic attack or traumatic brain injury;
- Comorbidities with depressive symptoms.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Superagers
SuperAgers are determined by the scores of global cognitive function.
This ensured that the participants are divided by a measure relevant to the current study without directly biasing the results toward the domain of interest.
|
Using comprehensive cognitive tests to quality the domain-specific cognitive changes during ageing.
|
|
Normal ageing elderly
The cases with the scores of cognitive performance within 1.5 standard deviation (SD) of age and education matched normative values derived from our cohort study, of which presented with HK MoCA score greater than 26 and CDR score equal to 0
|
Using comprehensive cognitive tests to quality the domain-specific cognitive changes during ageing.
|
|
Neurocognitive disorders patients
NCD patients are defined as: evidence of modest decline in one or more cognitive domains, which is set as ≥ 1.5 SD below the age- and education-adjusted normative scores; no interference with independence in everyday activities; and no comorbid major psychiatric disorders.
|
Using comprehensive cognitive tests to quality the domain-specific cognitive changes during ageing.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Global cognition will be measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Hong Kong version (HK MoCA)
Time Frame: 2022-2024
|
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment Hong Kong version (HK MoCA) is a validated and widely used screening assessment for detecting cognitive impairment, which measures an array of cognitive functions such as visuospatial, memory, language and attention.HK MoCA score less than 26 indicates cognitive impairments.
|
2022-2024
|
|
Complex attention will be measured by Attention Network Test (ANT)
Time Frame: 2022-2024
|
Attention Network Test (ANT).
The ANT paradigm (Download from: https://www.sacklerinstitute.org/cornell/assays_and_tools/ant/jin.fan/), as a computerized test, was used and performed by E-Prime 3.0 (Psychology Software Tools, PA, USA).
Within ANT paradigm, there are four types of cue: no cue, center cue, double cue, and spatial cue; and three types of flanker: neutral, congruent, and incongruent.
In a given trial, a central cross-fixation point presents for 400 to 1,600 ms (randomized), subsequently is replaced for 100 ms by one of four warning cues.
The target, a central arrow could appear above or below the cross-fixation and is surrounded by two flankers on each side.
|
2022-2024
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Learning and memory will be measured by Word list learning test (WLLT)
Time Frame: 2022-2024
|
Word list learning test (WLLT) consisting of fifteen semantically non-associated words that is presented consecutively over three free trials of immediate recall (i.e., learning ability), a 20-min delayed recall (to prevent recency effects) and followed by yes/no recognition (i.e., recognition memory).
Based on the proxies we developed in our previous work, components of learning and memory function will be evaluated and compared across groups, including working memory capacity (WMC), forgetting rate, delayed recall, initial learning, best learning, learning over trials (LOT) and learning ratio.
|
2022-2024
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Hanna LU, PhD, Chinese University of Hong Kong
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2019.078
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.