Decoding the Cognitive Trajectory of Hong Kong SuperAgers: a Longitudinal Follow-up Study

December 6, 2023 updated by: LU Hanna, Chinese University of Hong Kong
This is a prospective follow-up study conducted at the Department of Psychiatry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong. The participants, including high-performing elderly (SuperAgers), normal ageing elderly and neurocognitive disorder (NCD) patients will be re-invited from our previous cohort (2013-2014) (N=488).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the cognitive changes in older adults with different cognitive statuses.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

400

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

High-performing elderly (SuperAgers) and the cases with normal ageing and neurocognitive disorder (NCD) will be re-invited in this study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • SuperAgers are determined by the scores of global cognitive function. This ensured that the participants are divided by a measure relevant to the current study without directly biasing the results toward the domain of interest;
  • Normal aging: the cases with the scores of cognitive performance within 1.5 standard deviation (SD) of age and education matched normative values derived from our cohort study, of which presented with HK MoCA score greater than 26 and CDR score equal to 0;
  • NCD patients are defined as: evidence of modest decline in one or more cognitive domains, which is set as ≥ 1.5 SD below the age- and education-adjusted normative scores; no interference with independence in everyday activities; and no comorbid major psychiatric disorders.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of bipolar disorders or psychosis;
  • History of major neurological deficits including stroke, transient ischemic attack or traumatic brain injury;
  • Comorbidities with depressive symptoms.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Superagers
SuperAgers are determined by the scores of global cognitive function. This ensured that the participants are divided by a measure relevant to the current study without directly biasing the results toward the domain of interest.
Using comprehensive cognitive tests to quality the domain-specific cognitive changes during ageing.
Normal ageing elderly
The cases with the scores of cognitive performance within 1.5 standard deviation (SD) of age and education matched normative values derived from our cohort study, of which presented with HK MoCA score greater than 26 and CDR score equal to 0
Using comprehensive cognitive tests to quality the domain-specific cognitive changes during ageing.
Neurocognitive disorders patients
NCD patients are defined as: evidence of modest decline in one or more cognitive domains, which is set as ≥ 1.5 SD below the age- and education-adjusted normative scores; no interference with independence in everyday activities; and no comorbid major psychiatric disorders.
Using comprehensive cognitive tests to quality the domain-specific cognitive changes during ageing.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Global cognition will be measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Hong Kong version (HK MoCA)
Time Frame: 2022-2024
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment Hong Kong version (HK MoCA) is a validated and widely used screening assessment for detecting cognitive impairment, which measures an array of cognitive functions such as visuospatial, memory, language and attention.HK MoCA score less than 26 indicates cognitive impairments.
2022-2024
Complex attention will be measured by Attention Network Test (ANT)
Time Frame: 2022-2024
Attention Network Test (ANT). The ANT paradigm (Download from: https://www.sacklerinstitute.org/cornell/assays_and_tools/ant/jin.fan/), as a computerized test, was used and performed by E-Prime 3.0 (Psychology Software Tools, PA, USA). Within ANT paradigm, there are four types of cue: no cue, center cue, double cue, and spatial cue; and three types of flanker: neutral, congruent, and incongruent. In a given trial, a central cross-fixation point presents for 400 to 1,600 ms (randomized), subsequently is replaced for 100 ms by one of four warning cues. The target, a central arrow could appear above or below the cross-fixation and is surrounded by two flankers on each side.
2022-2024

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Learning and memory will be measured by Word list learning test (WLLT)
Time Frame: 2022-2024
Word list learning test (WLLT) consisting of fifteen semantically non-associated words that is presented consecutively over three free trials of immediate recall (i.e., learning ability), a 20-min delayed recall (to prevent recency effects) and followed by yes/no recognition (i.e., recognition memory). Based on the proxies we developed in our previous work, components of learning and memory function will be evaluated and compared across groups, including working memory capacity (WMC), forgetting rate, delayed recall, initial learning, best learning, learning over trials (LOT) and learning ratio.
2022-2024

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hanna LU, PhD, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Deterioration

Clinical Trials on Ageing

3
Subscribe