Ultrasound-Guided Microendoscopic Versus Fluoroscopic-Guided Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections
Ultrasound-Guided Microendoscopic Versus Fluoroscopic-Guided Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Thouraya HajAli, MSc
- Phone Number: 5738 +9611350000
- Email: th64@aub.edu.lb
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Marwan Rizk, MD
- Phone Number: 6380 +9611350000
- Email: mr04@aub.edu.lb
Study Locations
-
-
-
Beirut, Lebanon
- American University of Beirut Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Marwan Rizk, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age between 18 and 64 years old of either sex
- Disease status of American Society of Anesthesiologists grades I to II
- Patients presenting with single-level disc disease and radiculopathy (L2-L3; L3-L4; L4-L5) for steroid injection
- Confirmation of herniated disk by CT or MRI
- Able to give informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age under 18 or over 64 years old
- Pregnant women
- Disease status of American Society of Anesthesiologists grades III to IV
- Unable to provide an informed consent
- Radiculopathies at multiple spinal levels
- Non-lumbar herniated discs
- Clinically obvious or known spinal deformity or stenosis
- Previous spine surgery
- Local or systemic infection
- Allergy to steroids, anesthetics, or contrast material
- Uncorrectable coagulopathy and patients on anticoagulation therapy
- Patients who refuse the procedure
- Spine tuberculosis or tumors
- Prior injections within 3 months
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Ultrasound Microendoscopic
A US device with a curvilinear probe and with a microendoscope (EvoTouch+7 Star Scope), inserted into an 18G needle is used.
This group will also receive one AP view fluoroscopy (as control) to check for the diffusion of the contrast material in the epidural space.
|
Ultrasound-guided microendoscopic lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Fluoroscopy
A local anesthetic (2% lidocaine), a 22G, 90mm needle (Quincke spinal needle) is inserted into the skin.
Once the needle tip is in its target position, 0.5-5 cc of contrast (Omnipauqe) is injected.
If the contrast spread along the spinal nerve into the epidural space, a mixture of 3 cc of 0.125% Marcaine and 40 mg of Depo-Medrol is injected or Diprofos (1/2 ampoule (2 ml) per level).
|
Fluoroscopy-guided lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Intervention success rate
Time Frame: During the procedure.
|
The success of the procedure would be indicated by a questionnaire (yes/no answer).
This includes the success of visualization under ultrasound and the insertion of the needle within the target position.
|
During the procedure.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 3 weeks after discharge.
|
Patient satisfaction towards the procedure is indicated on NRS scale (0-10).
|
3 weeks after discharge.
|
|
Complications
Time Frame: During procedure.
|
Intravascular injection, intraneural injection, subarachnoid injection and patient discomfort.
|
During procedure.
|
|
Procedure time
Time Frame: Beginning of procedure till the end.
|
Time taken to complete the procedure.
|
Beginning of procedure till the end.
|
|
NRS pain score
Time Frame: Before procedure, 30 minutes after the procedure, 1 week and 3 weeks after the procedure.
|
Pain score will be assessed on NRS scale from 0-10.
|
Before procedure, 30 minutes after the procedure, 1 week and 3 weeks after the procedure.
|
|
Ultrasound visibility
Time Frame: During procedure.
|
Visualization of the radicular artery and visualization of the nerve root (yes/no answer)
|
During procedure.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Marwan Rizk, MD, American University of Beirut Medical Center
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Manchikanti L. Transforaminal lumbar epidural steroid injections. Pain Physician. 2000 Oct;3(4):374-98.
- Wu A, March L, Zheng X, Huang J, Wang X, Zhao J, Blyth FM, Smith E, Buchbinder R, Hoy D. Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Ann Transl Med. 2020 Mar;8(6):299. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.175.
- Mehta N, Salaria M, Salaria AQ. Comparison of fluoroscopic Guided Transforaminal Epidural Injections of Steroid and Local Anaesthetic with Conservative Management in Patients with Chronic Lumbar Radiculopathies. Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):17-22. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.186868.
- Hashemi M, Dadkhah P, Taheri M, Haji Seyed Abootorabi SM, Naderi-Nabi B. Ultrasound-Guided Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Injections; A Single Center Fluoroscopic Validation Study. Bull Emerg Trauma. 2019 Jul;7(3):251-255. doi: 10.29252/beat-070307.
- Jee H, Lee JH, Kim J, Park KD, Lee WY, Park Y. Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: a randomized, blinded, controlled study. Skeletal Radiol. 2013 Jan;42(1):69-78. doi: 10.1007/s00256-012-1434-1. Epub 2012 May 20.
- Engel A, King W, MacVicar J; Standards Division of the International Spine Intervention Society. The effectiveness and risks of fluoroscopically guided cervical transforaminal injections of steroids: a systematic review with comprehensive analysis of the published data. Pain Med. 2014 Mar;15(3):386-402. doi: 10.1111/pme.12304. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
- Yang G, Liu J, Ma L, Cai Z, Meng C, Qi S, Zhou H. Ultrasound-guided Versus Fluoroscopy-controlled Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Injections: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin J Pain. 2016 Feb;32(2):103-8. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000237.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- BIO-2022-0218
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.