Effect of Citalopram on Chest Pain in Patients With Functional Chest Pain (Ci-FCP)

February 9, 2023 updated by: Prof.dr. A.J. (Arjan) Bredenoord, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) in the absence of musculoskeletal abnormalities, major esophageal motor disorders, gastroesophageal reflux or eosinophilic esophagitis is called functional chest pain (FCP). Most likely multiple factors play a role, such as esophageal hypersensitivity and enhanced perception. Citalopram and other antidepressants are proven to be effective in the treatment of functional gastrointestinal disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome. With this trial the investigators want to assess the effect of citalopram on symptoms of chest pain in patients with functional chest pain.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Chest pain can be divided in cardiac or non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP). To establish the diagnosis NCCP, acute coronary disease has to be ruled out first. NCCP can be caused by functional chest pain (FCP). NCCP in the absence of musculoskeletal abnormalities, major esophageal motor disorders, gastroesophageal reflux or eosinophilic esophagitis is called FCP. The pathophysiology is not fully understood. Most likely multiple factors play a role, such as esophageal hypersensitivity and enhanced perception. Citalopram and other antidepressants are proven to be effective in the treatment of functional gastrointestinal disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome. However, available data regarding low dose antidepressants in functional chest pain is inconclusive. Moreover, all current evidence concerning the effect of low dose antidepressants in patients with functional chest pain is extracted from trials that pooled patients with different functional esophageal disorders. With this trial the investigators want to assess the effect of citalopram on symptoms of chest pain in patients with functional chest pain.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Netherlands
    • Noord-Holland
      • Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands, 1105AZ
        • Amsterdam UMC, location AMC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent
  • Minimum age: 18 years
  • Functional chest pain according to Rome IV criteria
  • Ruled out cardiac origin of chest pain
  • ECG with corrected QT interval (QTc) within the normal range (<450ms male, <460ms female)
  • Symptoms of chest pain for at least 6 months
  • Frequency of symptoms at least once a week
  • Gastroduodenoscopy, high-resolution manometry and 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring need to have been performed recently.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently using antidepressants
  • Contraindication for the use of SSRI
  • Already tried antidepressants off-label to treat chest pain
  • Known allergy to citalopram
  • Severe and clinically unstable concomitant disease
  • Pregnant, lactating or fertile women (without contraception)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Drug: Placebo
Placebo once a day for 12 weeks
Active Comparator: Citalopram 20mg
Drug: Citalopram 20mg
Citalopram 20mg once a day for 12 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Global assessment of patient reported change in chest pain after 6 weeks of treatment.
Time Frame: 6 weeks after start of the study

Patients will be asked; "Compared to the start of the treatment, how would you rate the chest pain now?

  • Completely resolved
  • Moderately better
  • Slightly better
  • No change
  • Slightly worse
  • Moderately worse
  • Much worse Patients who answered completely resolved or moderately better will be defined as treatment success.
6 weeks after start of the study

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Global assessment of patient reported change in chest pain after 12 weeks of treatment.
Time Frame: 12 weeks after start of the study

Patients will be asked; "Compared to the start of the treatment, how would you rate the chest pain now?

  • Completely resolved
  • Moderately better
  • Slightly better
  • No change
  • Slightly worse
  • Moderately worse
  • Much worse Patients who answered completely resolved or moderately better will be defined as treatment success.
12 weeks after start of the study
Symptom frequency
Time Frame: Daily diary during the entire duration of the study (12 weeks)
Patients are asked to report the frequency of symptom episodes on a daily base
Daily diary during the entire duration of the study (12 weeks)
Symptom severity
Time Frame: Daily diary during the entire duration of the study (12 weeks)

Patients are asked to report the severity of every symptom episode on a daily base.

The severity will be rated on a 4-point scale: mild (1, the symptom was well tolerated and did not last long) moderate (2, the symptom caused some discomfort, but did not interfere with usual activities), severe (3, the symptom caused a great deal of discomfort, and interfered with usual activities), disabling (4, the symptom was unbearable and interfered considerably with usual activities).
Daily diary during the entire duration of the study (12 weeks)
Chest pain will be scored on a 0-10 visual analog scale (VAS-score)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks
Patients are asked to report the severity of the chest pain every 6 weeks
Baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks
Health related quality of life measured using 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF36)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks
The health related quality of life is measured every 6 weeks
Baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks
Psychological comorbidity using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks
Psychological comorbidity is assessed every 6 weeks
Baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks
Adverse events/side effects
Time Frame: Adverse event reporting period is defined as the period following time of written informed consent up to 3 months after end of the observation period.
Patients are asked to report adverse events and side effects.
Adverse event reporting period is defined as the period following time of written informed consent up to 3 months after end of the observation period.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 17, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 22, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 22, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 26, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 9, 2023

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 20, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 20, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 9, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NL77673.018.21

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings