Evaluating Omission of Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factors in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Paclitaxel Portion of Dose-dense Adriamycin-cyclophosphamide and Paclitaxel Chemotherapy (REaCT-OGF)

July 6, 2026 updated by: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

A Randomized Pragmatic Trial Evaluating Omission of Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factors in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Paclitaxel Portion of Dose-dense Adriamycin-cyclophosphamide and Paclitaxel Chemotherapy (REaCT-OGF)

The goal of this randomized, pragmatic clinical trial is to evaluate the omission of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) in breast cancer patients receiving paclitaxel portion of dose-dense adriamycin-cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel (DD-AC/T) chemotherapy. Participants will be randomized to either take G-CSF while on the paclitaxel portion of DD-AC/T chemotherapy or to omit G-CSF while on the paclitaxel portion of DD-AC/T chemotherapy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Optimal curative chemotherapy treatment in the early-stage setting for breast cancer patients can reduce the risk of recurrence and result in improvement in breast cancer survival. The pivotal Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 9741 clinical trial demonstrated improved efficacy from administering 4 cycles of adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by 4 cycles of paclitaxel using a dose-dense schedule every 2-weeks instead of every 3 weeks in patients with high-risk early-stage breast cancer. It has since become a widely accepted standard care treatment option. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) such as filgrastim (FIL) and pegfilgrastim (PEG) are key supportive medications used with the dose-dense regimen to facilitate timely recovery of neutrophil count before the next cycle of treatment. However, G-CSF is associated with increased bone pain after chemotherapy (up to 40%) and drug-induced fever, which can result in additional clinical or emergency room visits. Clinicians have questioned if primary prophylactic G-CSF use is necessary with paclitaxel in the dose-dense regimen and the risk of hematological toxicity, such as the risk of low neutrophils and the risk of infection is lower with paclitaxel. Results from two retrospective studies suggest that it is safe and feasible to omit G-CSF during the paclitaxel portion of the DD-AC/T regimen. Based on the current trial data, there is a stong suggestion that it is safe, feasible and likely preferable to omit G-CSF during the paclitaxel portion of DD-AC/T chemotherapy. Given the majority of chemotherapy dose delays are related to issues such as bone pain (from G-CSF and paclitaxel) and peripheral neuropathy (from paclitaxel), and this may even be exacerbated by the use of G-CSF, it is anticipated that omitting G-CSF during paclitaxel chemotherapy may improve completion rates while improving health related quality of life (HR-QoL). Therefore, the researchers propose a randomized study to further evaluate patient-reported bone pain and HR-QoL from the omission of primary prophylactic G-CSF use during the paclitaxel portion of DD-AC/T chemotherapy while demonstrating supportive evidence that omitting G-CSF is safe and feasible.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
242

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Carol Stober
  • Phone Number: 77226 613-737-7700
  • Email: cstober@toh.ca

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 2V7
        • Recruiting
        • Kingston Health Sciences Centre
      • Oshawa, Ontario, Canada, L1G 2B9
        • Recruiting
        • Lakeridge Health
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L6
        • Recruiting
        • The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with early-stage or locally-advanced breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant DD-AC/T chemotherapy requiring primary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis with G-CSF
  • Able to provide verbal consent
  • Able to complete questionnaires in English or French

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No access to pegfilgrastim or filgrastim prior to randomization
  • Metastatic cancer
  • Known hypersensitivity to filgrastim or pegfilgrastim or one of its components
  • Patients received prior cytotoxic chemotherapy within the last 5 years
  • Patients with uncontrolled inter-current illness that would limit compliance with study requirements or other significant diseases or disorders that, in the investigator's opinion, would exclude the subject from participating in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Receive G-CSF
Receive G-CSF injections (either filgrastim or pegfilgrastim) after each cycle of paclitaxel chemotherapy.
Drug: Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF)
Participants will receive G-CSF injection (either filgrastim or pegfilgrastim) after each paclitaxel cycle of DD-AC/T chemotherapy.
Other Names:
  • Filgrastim
  • Pegfilgrastim
Experimental: Omission of G-CSF
Omission of G-CSF injections after each cycle of paclitaxel chemotherapy.
Drug: Omission of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF)
Participants will omit the use of G-CSF (either filgrastim or pegfilgrastim) after each paclitaxel cycle of DD-AC/T chemotherapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-reported bone pain during cycle 1 of paclitaxel
Time Frame: At the end of cycle 1 of paclitaxel chemotherapy (each cycle is 14 days)
The primary outcome is patient-reported bone pain from day 1 to 5 during cycle 1 of paclitaxel chemotherapy. The total measure of bone pain over the five days will be summarized by the area under the curve (AUC) using the trapezoidal quadrature method for patients reported daily pain score from day 1 to 5 during cycle 1 of paclitaxel chemotherapy. Day 1 being the morning after first dose of G-CSF injection, or 48 hours after chemotherapy injection in the No G-CSF arm. The daily pain score ranges from 0-40. Peak pain is defined as the maximum pain rating over day 1 to day 5. To reiterate the scoring system, every morning, patients are asked to rate the most severe pain they experienced in the last 24 hours on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). The X axis of the AUC represents time (i.e., days) and the Y axis represents pain severity (0-10).
At the end of cycle 1 of paclitaxel chemotherapy (each cycle is 14 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-reported bone pain across all paclitaxel cycles
Time Frame: After each of the paclitaxel chemotherapy cycles (each cycle is 14 days)
Bone pain mean AUC across all cycles of paclitaxel chemotherapy. The total measure of bone pain over the five days will be summarized by the area under the curve (AUC) using the trapezoidal quadrature method for patients reported daily pain score from day 1 to 5 during all cycles of paclitaxel chemotherapy. Day 1 being the morning after first dose of G-CSF injection, or 48 hours after chemotherapy injection in the No G-CSF arm. The daily pain score ranges from 0-40. Peak pain is defined as the maximum pain rating over day 1 to day 5. To reiterate the scoring system, every morning, patients are asked to rate the most severe pain they experienced in the last 24 hours on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). The X axis of the AUC represents time (i.e., days) and the Y axis represents pain severity (0-10).
After each of the paclitaxel chemotherapy cycles (each cycle is 14 days)
Peak bone pain experienced
Time Frame: Days 1 to 5 of the each of the paclitaxel chemotherapy cycles (each cycle is 14 days)
Peak bone pain experienced across all cycles of paclitaxel. Measured by the patient reported daily pain score from days 1 to 5 during all 4 cycles of paclitaxel chemotherapy. Bone pain is measured on a scale ranging from 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst possible pain.
Days 1 to 5 of the each of the paclitaxel chemotherapy cycles (each cycle is 14 days)
Patient health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Through study completion, average of 12 weeks
Patient Health-Related Quality of Life (HR-QoL) based on the EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire.
Through study completion, average of 12 weeks
Rates of completion of 4 cycles of paclitaxel
Time Frame: Through study completion, average of 12 weeks
Rates of completion of 4 cycles of paclitaxel chemotherapy within 7 weeks (days 1 cycle 5 to day 1 cycle 8 of chemotherapy)
Through study completion, average of 12 weeks
Dose-intensity of paclitaxel chemotherapy
Time Frame: Through study completion, average of 12 weeks
Dose intensity of paclitaxel (mg/m2/wk) chemotherapy. Dose intensity is a measure of a dose delay/dose reduction and premature chemotherapy discontinuation.
Through study completion, average of 12 weeks
Incidence of febrile neutropenia/neutropenia
Time Frame: Through study completion, average of 12 weeks
Incidences of febrile neutropenia/neutropenia will be collected using pretreatment bloodwork that is routinely performed before each chemotherapy cycle. For this study, febrile neutropenia (FN) is defined as a one-time oral temperature greater or equal to 38.3 degrees Celsius (approximately 100.9 Fahrenheit) or a sustained temperature equal or greater than 38 degrees Celsius for 1 or more hours in a patient who has an absolute neutrophil count of less than 500 cells/microliter or an absolute neutrophil count expected to decrease to less than 500 cells/microliter within a 48-hour period.
Through study completion, average of 12 weeks
Incidence of treatment-related hospitalizations/ER visits
Time Frame: Through study completion, average of 12 weeks
The number of treatment-related hospitalizations and emergency room visits that occur from the start of paclitaxel chemotherapy to 1 month after the last paclitaxel chemotherapy cycle
Through study completion, average of 12 weeks
Healthcare resource utilization: Emergency Room Visits
Time Frame: Through study completion, average of 12 weeks
The number of emergency room visits that occur will be collected.
Through study completion, average of 12 weeks
Healthcare resource utilization: Planned and Unplanned Provider Visits
Time Frame: Through study completion, average of 12 weeks
The number of planned and unplanned provider clinic visits, including visits to stretcher bay will be collected.
Through study completion, average of 12 weeks
Healthcare resource utilization: Phone Calls and Emails
Time Frame: Through study completion, average of 12 weeks
The number of phone calls and emails to patient support line provider (reported by the patient) will be collected.
Through study completion, average of 12 weeks
Cost-effectiveness ratios
Time Frame: Through study completion, average of 12 weeks
There will be a cost-utility analysis comparing the differences in cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) between omitting G-CSF and standard G-CSF use. The statistical analysis will be conducted in accordance with current guidelines for clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis alongside randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Health utility values will be derived from EQ-5D-5L scores using the published mapping algorithm.
Through study completion, average of 12 weeks
Incidence of chemotherapy-related mortality
Time Frame: Through study completion, average of 12 weeks
Deaths from start of chemotherapy to one month after completion of last chemotherapy cycle
Through study completion, average of 12 weeks
Rate of secondary G-CSF or antibiotic use
Time Frame: Through study completion, average of 12 weeks
Rates of added G-CSF use for both randomization arms will be collected. As well as the addition of antibiotic use.
Through study completion, average of 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Xinni Song, MD, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 17, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 24, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 22, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 3, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 6, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • REaCT-OGF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings