Refine and Assess the Readability of Patient, Carer, and Clinician Treatment Preference in Myelodysplasia Questionnaire (TPMQ)

April 4, 2023 updated by: Otsuka Australia Pharmaceutical Pty Ltd

Qualitative Interviews to Refine and Assess the Importance of Constructs, and Ensure the Readability of Patient, Carer, and Clinician Versions of the Treatment Preference in Myelodysplasia Questionnaire (TPMQ): pTPMQ, cTPMQ, and mTPMQ, Respectively

The primary goal of this study is to use qualitative interviews to elicit and confirm concepts related to treatment preferences and understandability of the pTPMQ, cTPMQ, and mTPMQ. The information gathered will be used to support the appropriateness of the questionnaires as a patient-reported, caregiver-reported and clinician-reported outcome measure (PROM) in the population of interest.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
16

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Australia
    • New South Wales
      • Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
        • Calvary Mater Newcastle

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients diagnosed with myelodysplasia who are eligible for treatment with azacitidine or are being treated with azacitidine or have been treated with azacitidine, and Primary carers of the patients such as those mentioned above, and Clinicians who treat patients such as those mentioned above

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Potential subjects must satisfy all of the following criteria to be enrolled in the study:

A. Adult patients with myelodysplastic syndrome meeting any one of the following criteria:

  1. They are currently being treated with azacitidine or
  2. They have recently been treated with azacitidine or
  3. They have been deemed eligible for treatment with azacitidine, but have not yet commenced treatment

B: Primary caregiver of a patient meeting all of the inclusion criteria (i.e. a patient who meets criteria defined above in A).

C. Clinician treating patients meeting all of the inclusion criteria (i.e. treats patients who meet criteria defined above in A).

Exclusion Criteria:

Potential subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participating in the study:

Exclusion Criteria

A. Patients meeting any of the following criteria are excluded:

  1. They have lower risk disease (international prognostic scoring system low or intermediate-1 risk)
  2. Cognitive or physical impairment of a nature that makes it infeasible for them to effectively participate in a structured interview.
  3. Deemed appropriate for stem cell transplantation and are being pre-treated or will be treated with azacitidine
  4. They were treated, are being treated, or will be treated with azacitdine as part of a clinical trial
  5. They are a relative of an employee of the investigational clinic, sponsor or research organization (e.g., Investigator, Coordinator, Technician, Interviewer).

B. Carers meeting any of the following criteria are excluded:

  1. They are a caregiver of a patient who meets any of the exclusion criteria listed above in A
  2. They are a relative of an employee of the investigational clinic, sponsor or research organization (e.g., Investigator, Coordinator, Technician, Interviewer).

C. Clinician will be excluded from participating in the study if a relative of an employee of the sponsor or research organization (e.g., Investigator, Coordinator, Technician, Interviewer).

D. Participants who are not fluent in English, or who cannot read or write in English will be excluded from the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Patient
Patients with MDS
Other: Patient Treatment Preference Myelodysplasia Questionnaire
Patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in MDS
Carer
Carers of patients with MDS
Other: Carer Treatment Preference Myelodysplasia Questionnaire
Caregiver-reported outcome measure in MDS
Clinician
Clinicians who treat MDS
Other: Clinician Treatment Preference Myelodysplasia Questionnaire
Clinician-reported outcome measure in MDS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Validation of the pTPMQ, cTPMQ and mTPMQ
Time Frame: Each participant is interviewed once for approximately 45 - 60 minutes
Observational qualitative study consisting of interviews with MDS participants. The study endpoints are an assessment of understanding of the questions, response options and directions, as described in the ISPOR patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) guidance.
Each participant is interviewed once for approximately 45 - 60 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Otsuka Australia Pharmaceutical Pty Ltd

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Anoop K Enjeti, MBBS FRCP FRCPA PhD, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Edith Street, Waratah, NSW 2298 Australia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 28, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 10, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 10, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 4, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 4, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 4, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 393-419-00045
  • 2021_PID02858 (Other Identifier: Otsuka Australia Pharmaceutical Pty Ltd)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

Clinical Trials on Patient Treatment Preference Myelodysplasia Questionnaire

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings