Food Intervention to Reduce Immunotherapy ToXicity (FORX01)

March 21, 2025 updated by: Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
The FORX (Food intervention to Reduce immunotherapy toXicity) trial will assess whether supplementing dietary fiber intake by providing weekly boxes containing 30 different plants to patients with solid tumors starting immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy affects the incidence of immune related adverse events.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has revolutionized cancer treatment but can give rise to immune related adverse events (irAEs) that are currently not preventable. These irAEs impact patients' quality of life and oncological treatment course. The gut plays an essential role in immune homeostasis and gut dysbiosis is implicated in (auto)inflammatory conditions. The FORX trial investigates whether the composition of the gut microbiome can be altered to improve ICI tolerance. It has been shown that healthy volunteers who ingest at least 30 different plants (vegetables, fruits, nuts) weekly, have a more diverse microbiome than those who consume 10 or less. A fiber-rich diet has been associated with improved outcome of ICI treatment. This trial is the first prospective trial to translate these findings into a concrete dietary advice. The diets of patients with a solid tumor who start ICI will be supplemented by weekly boxes containing 30 different plants during the first 12 weeks of their treatment. The increased fiber intake is expected to strengthen the gut microbiome and reduce the incidence of irAEs. Stool and blood samples will clarify the microbial and cytokine signatures associated with irAEs. The FORX trial will provide valuable insights in the interaction between the gut microbiome and autoimmunity and serve as a basis for nutritional advice and the development of targeted probiotics. It will empower cancer patients and improve their quality of life.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • solid tumor starting anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD1) and/or anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (anti-CTLA4) antibodies as part of standard of care.
  • able to sign informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no oral intake possible.
  • probiotic use and unwillingness to stop during the trial.
  • combination therapy with chemotherapy or targeted agents.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: High Fiber diet
During the first 12 weeks of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, patients will receive weekly boxes containing 30 different plants (vegetables, fruits, nuts, grains) according to seasonal availability following the Flemish Superior Health Council guidelines. Recipes will be added to inspire processing of the box. Boxes will be ordered at an online supermarket, who will deliver the boxes at patients' homes. Weekly follow-up will ensure a minimum daily intake of 20 g of fiber, progressively increasing over the first 4 weeks.
Other: Food box containing 30 different plants
Food boxes during first 12 weeks of therapy. Clinical follow-up until end of immunotherapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of performing a dietary intervention trial in our center
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Recruitment will be temporarily held after 10 patients to assess compliance with protocol and dietary intervention. If at least 7/10 patients are able to complete the 12 weeks according to protocol, the trial will be considered feasible and recruitment will continue.
12 weeks
Incidence of immune related adverse events
Time Frame: up to 24 months
Assess incidence and grade of irAEs throughout the 12-week intervention phase and until end of ICI treatment by frequency counts and grade. Comparison with historical control.
up to 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response rate
Time Frame: up to 48 weeks
Measure objective response rate at 12 weeks and progression free survival at week 12, 24 and 48 according to RECIST 1.1. Observational comparison with historical control.
up to 48 weeks
Quality of life
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Assess change in quality of life following dietary intervention using European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS) questionnaire at baseline, at 6 weeks and at 12 weeks.
12 weeks
Changes in gut microbiota
Time Frame: 12 weeks and in case of an irAE up to 48 months
Assess changes in gut microbiota composition following dietary intervention. Assess microbiota signatures associated with irAEs.
12 weeks and in case of an irAE up to 48 months
Assess changes in cytokines and immune cell subsets associated with irAEs
Time Frame: 12 weeks and in case of an irAE up to 48 months
Blood samples will be collected at baseline, every 4 weeks for 12 weeks during the intervention and in case of toxicity. Based on published data, the investigators will primarily focus on Th17-related cytokines (IL-6, IL-17, IL-23, IFN-gamma). PBMC will be analysed using high dimensional flow cytometry, using panels to measure different immune cell subsets (T cells and subtypes, B cells, among which regulatory B cells). Analysis using regression models.
12 weeks and in case of an irAE up to 48 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sandrine Aspeslagh, MD PhD, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 14, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 27, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 26, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 21, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • FORX01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings