Promoting Informed Choice for Breast Cancer Screening: A Longitudinal Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Tamar Parmet
- Phone Number: 16102090652
- Email: tamar.parmet@cuanschutz.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Kate Noonan
- Email: kate.noonan@cuanschutz.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
- University Of Colorado Hospital
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
- University of Pennsylvania
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Individuals who identify as female at birth
- Ages 39-49 years old (inclusive) at the time of consent
- English literacy
- Internet access
- No prior diagnosis of breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS, also known as "stage zero breast cancer"), or lobular carcinoma in situ
- No known BCRA1/2 gene mutation
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals who identify other than female at birth
- Individuals who are currently pregnant
- Individuals < 39 years old or 50 years old and > at the time of consent
- Lack English literacy
- Lack of internet access
- Prior diagnosis of breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS, also known as "stage zero breast cancer"), or lobular carcinoma in situ
- Known BCRA1/2 gene mutation
- Decisionally Challenged Individuals
- Prisoners or those on alternative sentencing or probation
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Cohort-1
Individuals who identify as female at birth age 39-49 without a prior breast cancer diagnosis (including DCIS or LCIS) or known BCRA1/2 gene mutations.
|
R - Reactance, E - self-Exemption, D - Disbelief, S - Source derogation
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
REDS (Reactance, Self-Exemption, Disbelief and Source Derogation) Reactions to Mammography Benefits
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Reactance, self-Exemption, Disbelief and Source derogation in reaction to evidence about mammography benefits.
This is a multi-item measure (3-4 questions per subscale) and assessed on a 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) Likert scale.
Averages will be computed to create for scores (corresponding to each sub scale), with a maximum score of 5 and minimum score of 1. Higher scores indicate more reactance, self-exemption and disbelief.
|
12 months
|
|
Screening Intentions Question
Time Frame: 12 months
|
This is a single item question in which participants will indicated their intentions to initiate regular screening with mammograms, using a 4 category response: 1. screen now, 2. wait until they are older but before age 50, 3. wait until age 50, or 4. do not intend to screen in the future at any age
|
12 months
|
|
Number of Participants Who Receive Screening in the Study Period
Time Frame: 12 months
|
We will use medical records to identify whether the participant has received screening in the 12-month study period
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in breast cancer screening knowledge from pre- to post-decision aid
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Breast cancer screening knowledge is assessed immediately before and after the decision aid, and at follow up survey time points.
Screening knowledge is assessed with a 10-item multiple choice questionnaire developed in prior research (Hersch et al., 2015).
Minimum score=0/10 (0% correct), maximum score=10/10 (100% correct).
|
12 months
|
|
Whether the participant had a conversation with their doctor about screening
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Assessed after the clinic appointment, participants report whether they talked with their doctor about screening in that appointment using a 3-category response: 1. No, not at all, 2. Yes briefly, 3. Yes in some detail
|
12 months
|
|
Change in medical mistrust from pre- to post-decision aid
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Medical mistrust (Eaton et al. 2015) is a 6-item validated scale that is administered before the decision aid, after decision aid, and at follow up surveys.
Questions are answered using a 1-5 strongly disagree-strongly agree Likert scale.
Minimum score=1, maximum score=5.
|
12 months
|
|
Perceptions of breast cancer risk
Time Frame: 12 months
|
This is a multi-item validated scale to assess perceptions of personal risk, the TRIRISK measure (Ferrer et al. 2016).
Scale items are modified to assess perceived breast cancer risk.
In this study we assess only the deliberative and affective subscales.
Questions are answered using Likert scales.
Minimum score=1, maximum score=5.
|
12 months
|
|
Emotional responses to the decision aid
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The validated Berlin Emotional Responses to Risk Instrument (BERRI; Petrova et al., 2022) is used to assess emotional response to the decision aid.
Participants indicate how they felt when they read the decision aid (angry, worried, hopeful, etc.), responding on a 1-7 Likert scale.
Mean scores (min=1, max=7) are computed for positive emotion (assured, hopeful, relieved), anxiety (anxious, afraid, worried) and anger (angry, mad).
|
12 months
|
|
Whether the participant plans to talk to their doctor about screening in an upcoming appointment
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Assessed after the decision aid but before the clinic appointment.
Participants indicate whether they intend to discuss breast cancer screening with their doctor using a 4-category response: 1. Definitely not, Probably not, Probably yes, Definitely yes
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Laura Scherer, University of Colorado, Denver
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 22-0957.cc
- R37CA254926 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.