Human Amnion Membrane Allograft and Early Return of Erectile Function After Radical Prostatectomy (HAMMER)

July 10, 2026 updated by: Sanoj Punnen, MD, MAS, University of Miami

Phase 2 Randomized Trial: Human Amnion Membrane Allograft and Early Return of Erectile Function After Radical Prostatectomy (HAMMER)

The purpose of this research study is to evaluate if placing a dehydrated human amnion chorion membrane (dHACM) over the nerves after removal of the prostate during surgery (radical prostatectomy) will allow an earlier recovery of erectile function and urinary control after surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
118

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • University of Miami

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Men aged 40 to 80 years with localized prostate cancer who are undergoing RARP at the University of Miami (UM).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Men requiring the use of any non-oral erectile aids for erectile dysfunction (ED).
  2. Men with baseline EPIC26 scores < 50.
  3. Patients with complete, bilateral nerve resection.
  4. Previous treatment for prostate cancer.
  5. Previous history of pelvic radiation.
  6. Patients with impaired decision-making capacity.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Membrane Arm: dHACM Group
Participants will undergo standard of care robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) surgery and the dehydrated Human Amnion Chorion Membrane (dHACM) membrane placed after removal of the prostate. Participants will be in the group for approximately 12 months.
Biological: BioDFence G3 Placental Tissue Membrane
The BioDFence G3 Placental Tissue Membrane is a three-layer tissue allograft consisting of amnion-chorion-amnion. Amniotic membranes will be placed over the neurovascular bundle after extirpative RARP. The membrane will be cut into two longitudinal pieces and placed over each neurovascular bundle separately.
Other Names:
  • Dehydrated Human Amnion Chorion Membrane (dHACM)
  • Human Amnion Membrane Allograft
Procedure: Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Robot-assisted surgical removal of the prostate, administered standard of care.
Other Names:
  • RARP
Other: Control Arm: No dHACM Group
Participants will undergo standard of care RARP surgery but will have no dehydrated Human Amnion Chorion Membrane (dHACM) placed after removal of the prostate. Participants will be in the group for approximately 12 months.
Procedure: Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Robot-assisted surgical removal of the prostate, administered standard of care.
Other Names:
  • RARP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Erectile Function Recovery as Measured by EPIC26 Sexual Domain Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 Months Post-RARP
Erectile function recovery among participants will be measured by the change in scores within the Sexual Domain of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC26). The EPIC26 is a 26-item questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among men with prostate cancer. The EPIC26 has five domains: Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Irritative/Obstructive, Bowel, Sexual, and Hormonal. Response options for each EPIC item form a Likert scale, and multi-item scale scores are transformed linearly to a 0-100 scale with higher scores representing better HRQOL.
Baseline, 12 Months Post-RARP

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Erectile Function Recovery as Measured by SHIM Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 Months Post-RARP
Erectile function recovery among participants will be measured as the change in Sexual History Inventory for Men (SHIM). The SHIM is a health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaire whose scores measure the severity of erectile dysfunction (ED) in men using points on a scale. The minimum score of 1 to 7 points indicates severe ED; a score of 8 to 11 points indicates moderate ED; a score of 12 to 15 points indicates mild-to-moderate ED; a score of 17 to 21 points indicates mild ED; and the maximum score of 22 to 25 points indicates no significant ED.
Baseline, 12 Months Post-RARP
Change in Proportion of Men with Mild ED or Better as Defined by EPIC26 Sexual Domain Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months Post-RARP
Proportion of men with mild ED or better as defined by an EPIC26 Sexual Domain score greater than or equal to 60. Response options for each EPIC item form a Likert scale, and multi-item scale scores are transformed linearly to a 0-100 scale with higher scores representing better sexual function.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months Post-RARP
Change in Proportion of Participants with mild ED or Better as Defined by SHIM Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months Post-RARP
Proportion of participants with mild ED or better as defined by a SHIM score greater than or equal to 17. The SHIM is a health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaire whose scores measure the severity of erectile dysfunction (ED) in men using points on a scale. The minimum score of 1 to 7 points indicates severe ED; a score of 8 to 11 points indicates moderate ED; a score of 12 to 15 points indicates mild-to-moderate ED; a score of 17 to 21 points indicates mild ED; and the maximum score of 22 to 25 points indicates no significant ED.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months Post-RARP
Change in Proportion of Participants with Erections Adequate for Penetration ≥ 50% of the time
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months Post-RARP
Proportion of participants with erections adequate for penetration greater than or equal to 50-percent of the time.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months Post-RARP
Change in Proportion of Participants who Require the Use of More Invasive Erectile Aids
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months Post-RARP
Proportion of participants who require the use of more invasive erectile aids (intra-cavernosal injection, vacuum pump, or penile prosthesis).
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months Post-RARP
Change in Rate of Urinary Control
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months Post-RARP
Rate of urinary control as measured by EPIC26 question 3 that reports the number of participants requiring no pads per day.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months Post-RARP
Change in Biochemical Failure
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months Post-RARP
Biochemical failure among participants will measured as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level > 0.2 ng/ml on two consecutive samples.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months Post-RARP
Number of Treatment-Related Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to 12 months post-RARP
The number of treatment-related adverse events among participants will be assessed by treating physician using the Clavien-Dindo grading scale.
Up to 12 months post-RARP

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Miami

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Integra LifeSciences Corporation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sanoj Punnen, MD, MAS, University of Miami

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 24, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 24, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 24, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 3, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 14, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 10, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20220852

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings