Effects of Global Hip Versus Isolated Abductors Strengthening Exercises in Patients Withsecondary Piriformis Syndrome
Effects of Global Hip Versus Isolated Abductors Muscles Strengthening Exerciseprogram on Pain, Range of Motion, and Lower Extremity Function in Patients Withsecondary Piriformis Syndrome
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Imran Amjad, PHD*
- Phone Number: 051-5481826
- Email: imran.amjad@riphah.edu.pk
Study Locations
-
-
Punjab
-
Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan, 54700
- Riphah rehabilitation clinic, Lahore
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Both Genders
- age: 20-50 years
- Batty test to diagnose secondary piriformis syndrome
Exclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed Congenital spinal defects
- Diagnosed Hip arthritis
- Pregnancy
- Diagnosed Disc facet pathology
- History of Spinal trauma
- Musculoskeletal abnormality in the lumbar spine
- Diagnosed Rheumatologic disorders
- Any diagnosed bony or soft tissue systemic disease
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Group A: Global hip muscles strengthening exercises
Group A Group A will receive hot packs along with all hip muscle strengthening exercises.
All exercises were performed for 3 sessions per week for 6 weeks.
Outcome measures will be taken at baseline, in 3rd week, and at the end of the 6th week.
|
Strengthening exercises will be given to all hip muscles
|
|
Active Comparator: Group B: Hip abductors strengthening exercises
Group B will receive hot packs along with Hip abductors strengthening.
A baseline assessment will be done on eligible participants.
3 sessions were given 3 days per week, Outcome measures will be taken at baseline, in 3rd week, and at the end of the 6th week.
|
Strengthening exercises will be given to hip abductor muscles
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Numeric Pain Rating scale
Time Frame: follow up at 12th week
|
Pain intensity will be assessed by NPRS.
The 11-point NPRS (intervals from 0-10) isused to quantify pain intensity; 0 represents no pain, and 10 represent the worst possible agony.
The NPRS is an valid and reliable instrument for older persons.Participants will be asked to select the number that most accurately describes theirlevel of pain.
At the baseline assessment, following each exercise session during the12-week intervention, and finally at the end of the intervention Programme, the NPRS scores will be recorded.
|
follow up at 12th week
|
|
Hand held dynamometer:
Time Frame: follow up at 12th week
|
Using a Jamar hydraulic hand-held dynamometer, the isometric muscle strength ofthe involved hip abductor and extensor muscles will be measured (JHHD).
|
follow up at 12th week
|
|
Goniometer:
Time Frame: follow up at 12th week
|
The fulcrum and the body are placedover the joint being measured.
The stationary arm is the arm of the goniometer thataligns with the inactive part of the joint measured.
It is structurally a part of the bodyand is not movable independently of the body.
The moving arm is the arm of the goniometer, which aligns with the mobile part of the joint measured.
|
follow up at 12th week
|
|
Lower extremity function scale:
Time Frame: follow up at 12th week
|
The LEFS can be used by clinicians as a measure of patients' initial function, ongoingprogress, and outcome as well as to set functional goals.
LEFS to establish functionallevel, set goals, and track progress and outcome.
Consider a patient with an initialLEFS score of 46/80.
Based on the error at a given point in time for the LEFS of 5points, the clinician can be 90% confident that the actual scale score is between 41and 51.
If the patient's condition is deemed to be relatively chronic and is expected tochange slowly, the clinician might select a 2-week time frame for a change in scoreof just at the MDC and MCID of 9 scale points.
The short-term goal, therefore, couldbe: "Increase LEFS score to less than or equal to 54/ 80."
In setting a short-term goalfor a patient with a relatively acute condition who is predicted to experience changequickly, a shorter time frame of, for example, 1 week with a greater change than theMDC and MCID may be selected
|
follow up at 12th week
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: maria Abbas chishty, MS*, Riphah International University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Park JC, Shim JH, Chung SH. The effects of three types of piriform muscle stretching on muscle thickness and the medial rotation angle of the coxal articulation. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Oct;29(10):1811-1814. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1811. Epub 2017 Oct 21.
- Iwanaga J, Eid S, Simonds E, Schumacher M, Loukas M, Tubbs RS. The majority of piriformis muscles are innervated by the superior gluteal nerve. Clin Anat. 2019 Mar;32(2):282-286. doi: 10.1002/ca.23311. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
- Cassidy L, Walters A, Bubb K, Shoja MM, Tubbs RS, Loukas M. Piriformis syndrome: implications of anatomical variations, diagnostic techniques, and treatment options. Surg Radiol Anat. 2012 Aug;34(6):479-86. doi: 10.1007/s00276-012-0940-0. Epub 2012 Feb 12.
- Filler AG. Piriformis and related entrapment syndromes: diagnosis & management. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2008 Oct;19(4):609-22, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2008.07.029.
- Shah SS, Consuegra JM, Subhawong TK, Urakov TM, Manzano GR. Epidemiology and etiology of secondary piriformis syndrome: A single-institution retrospective study. J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Jan;59:209-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.069. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- REC/RCR & AHS/23/0102
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.