Touch on One Thumb, RSI on the Other Thumb: Which Surgery Shows Better Results

April 16, 2024 updated by: Schulthess Klinik

Touch on One Thumb, RSI on the Other Thumb: Which Surgery Shows Better Results: An Ambidirectional Trial

The study aims to determine whether CMC I arthroplasty using a Touch® implant results in higher patient satisfaction compared to RSI arthroplasty in the medium-term in patients with primary thumb osteoarthritis. Additionally, the study compares the patients' clinical and self-reported outcomes between the Touch® implant and the RSI arthroplasty. Therefore, patients with a Touch® implant in one thumb and an RSI arthroplasty in the other thumb will be recruited.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients suffering from osteoarthritis in the first carpometacarpal joint (CMC I OA) are often surgically treated with a resection-suspension-interposition (RSI) arthroplasty. An alternative technique is an arthroplasty with a Touch® implant. There is a growing body of evidence indicating that patients with a Touch® prosthesis recover significantly faster and return to work more quickly than patients after an RSI arthroplasty. However, there have been no studies comparing the two operations in the same patient. By recruiting patients with a Touch® implant in one thumb and an RSI arthroplasty in the other thumb, this study aims to investigate whether CMC I arthroplasty using a Touch® implant leads to higher patient satisfaction compared to RSI arthroplasty in the medium-term. Further patient-reported and clinical outcomes will be assessed to compare the two surgeries.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
14

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Switzerland
      • Zurich, Switzerland, 8008
        • Schulthess Klinik

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consists of patients with CMC I joint osteoarthritis. They have a Touch® prosthesis in one thumb and an RSI arthroplasty in the other.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed Consent signed by the patient.
  • Patient is diagnosed with primary OA in both CMC I joints and was operated with a Touch® prosthesis on one thumb and with an RSI arthroplasty on the other thumb.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with any type of revision surgery at the CMC I joint
  • Patient underwent hand surgery within the last three months
  • Legal incompetence

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Touch-RSI

The group consists of patients with a Touch® implant in one thumb and an RSI arthroplasty in the other thumb.

Intervention: Patient questionnaire and clinical examination to investigate differences between the thumb with a Touch® implant and the thumb with an RSI.
Device: Touch® Prosthesis
The Touch® prosthesis is a medical device approved in Switzerland, which is an effective surgical treatment for advanced CMC I osteoarthritis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient satisfaction wiht treatment result using 5-point Likert scale
Time Frame: Follow-up at least 3 months to 12 years after surgery
5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied)
Follow-up at least 3 months to 12 years after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sociodemographic information
Time Frame: Follow-up at least 3 months to 12 years after surgery
Questionnaire
Follow-up at least 3 months to 12 years after surgery
Additional aspects of patient satisfaction with treatment
Time Frame: Follow-up at least 3 months to 12 years after surgery
Questionnaire
Follow-up at least 3 months to 12 years after surgery
Differences between both thumbs
Time Frame: Follow-up at least 3 months to 12 years after surgery
Questionnaire
Follow-up at least 3 months to 12 years after surgery
Brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ)
Time Frame: Follow-up at least 3 months to 12 years after surgery
The german version of the brief MHQ will be used to assess patient-reported hand function. The score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better hand function.
Follow-up at least 3 months to 12 years after surgery
Grip strength assessed with Jamar Dynamometer
Time Frame: Follow-up at least 3 months to 12 years after surgery
Jamar Dynamometer
Follow-up at least 3 months to 12 years after surgery
Key pinch strength assessed with pinch gauge
Time Frame: Follow-up at least 3 months to 12 years after surgery
Pinch gauge
Follow-up at least 3 months to 12 years after surgery
Range of motion of the humb metacarpal (MCP) and interphalangeal (IP) joint assessed with a goniometer
Time Frame: Follow-up at least 3 months to 12 years after surgery
Used to measure flexion and extension of the thumb metacarpal (MCP) and interphalangeal (IP) joint. The evaluation of active thumb opposition is based on the Kapandji index, ranging from 1 (can touch only the lateral side of the index finger) to 10 (can reach the volar crease of the hand).
Follow-up at least 3 months to 12 years after surgery
Pain at rest and during activities of daily living (ADL) assessed using Numeric rating scales (NRS)
Time Frame: Follow-up at least 3 months to 12 years after surgery
NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)
Follow-up at least 3 months to 12 years after surgery
Radiographs of both thumbs
Time Frame: Follow-up at least 3 months to 12 years after surgery
To monitor the implant and to assess the scaphometacarpal distance, which can be used to identify migration of the thumb metacarpal bone, a phenomenon often observed after trapeziectomy.
Follow-up at least 3 months to 12 years after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Schulthess Klinik

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Daniel B. Herren, Dr. med., Schulthess Klinik

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 21, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 10, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 10, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 30, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 27, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 9, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 16, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • OE-0203

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings