Substituting SMSs for Provider-delivered Care to Improve Alcohol Use Outcomes

February 19, 2025 updated by: University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Substituting SMSs for Provider-delivered Care to Improve Alcohol Use Outcomes in People With and Without HIV in Lesotho

The goal of this clinical trial is to test whether a technology-substituted intervention (mhGAP-Remote) derived from the World Health Organization's (WHO) Mental Health Gap Action Programme-Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG) is effective to reduce alcohol use among adults with and without HIV in Lesotho. Participants who receive the mhGAP-Remote intervention will complete one in-person intervention session pertaining to the mhGAP-IG module for alcohol use, followed by short message services (SMSs) related to the intervention material covered during the in person session. This will be compared to mhGAP-Standard, which involves 4 in-person sessions based on mhGAP-IG for alcohol use plus the option of 2 additional booster sessions. Participants in both treatment groups will complete assessments at baseline, 8-weeks follow-up, 20-weeks follow-up, and 32-weeks follow-up, consisting of self-reported questionnaires and laboratory tests.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Mental health and alcohol and other drug use problems account for over 20% of the years lived with disability globally, including in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Unfortunately, there is a severe shortage of treatment providers available in LMICs for these problems, and access to care is limited due to cost, transportation, infrastructure, lack of awareness, and stigma. The use of technology as a substitute for some provider-delivered time is an appealing and promising strategy to increase access to alcohol use treatment. Specifically, using SMSs to deliver intervention content is a feasible approach in low-resource settings and has been successfully implemented for other behavioral health problems. The primary objective of this study is to test the effectiveness of a technology substituted mhGAP intervention, mhGAP-Remote, to reduce alcohol use when compared to standard in-person treatment, mhGAP-Standard. Study results can inform barriers to accessing treatment and care for alcohol use.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
255

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Lesotho
    • Butha Buthe
      • Butha-Buthe, Butha Buthe, Lesotho
        • Butha Buthe District Hospital
      • Butha-Buthe, Butha Buthe, Lesotho
        • Seboche Hospital
      • Butha-Buthe, Butha Buthe, Lesotho
        • St. Paul's Health Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults (≥ 18 years old)
  • Meets criteria for "hazardous drinking" according to the AUDIT (total score of ≥ 6 for women, ≥ 8 for men)
  • Has cellphone access at least half the days of the week, regular access to electricity to charge the phone, and is comfortable receiving study-specific SMSs related to alcohol use treatment on the phone
  • Willing to participate in a study focused on problem drinking
  • Willing and able to regularly come to the health facility/clinic for intervention sessions during the active intervention period
  • Able to read in Sesotho or English or has a treatment supporter (e.g., family member) able to read study-related materials
  • Willing to have intervention sessions audio-recorded
  • Attends one of the study clinics and intends to remain at the same clinic for the duration of the trial

Exclusion Criteria:

  • High-risk alcohol use that warrants medical management
  • Known brain tumor or brain damage, history of epilepsy, or history of delirium
  • Untreated major mental illness that interferes with study participation, such as psychosis, or mania
  • Reported pregnancy at time of enrolment
  • Currently receiving psychological treatment for alcohol use
  • Participation in another trial that is judged by the site investigator as non-compatible with this study
  • Unable to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: mhGAP-Remote
mhGAP-Remote was developed specifically by our team. It involves the same intervention components described in mhGAP-Standard. However, in mhGAP-Remote the intervention is delivered mostly through standardized SMSs. There is one in-person session with the interventionist, where the participant learns the core skills of mhGAP. This is followed by standardized SMSs to reinforce intervention content learned in the first session. Study interventionists will be able to provide brief telephonic support to participants if participants struggle to implement the skills learned.
Behavioral: mhGAP-Remote
One in-person session followed by standardized SMSs to reinforce the concepts learned in the first session. The intervention follows principles of the World Health Organization's Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP). Study interventionists can provide telephonic support to participants to implement the skills.
Active Comparator: mhGAP-Standard
mhGAP-Standard refers to the existing evidence-based intervention guide that was developed by the WHO to help non-specialist providers in LMIC settings provide treatment for alcohol use, among other mental health and neurological conditions. For the current study, the intervention will focus on mhGAP's psychosocial interventions, which involve psychoeducation, brief motivational interviewing, and providing strategies to reduce and/or stop use. The intervention uses a harm reduction approach, meaning that participants do not need to stop using alcohol altogether. Interventionists will deliver 4 sessions, approximately 45-60 mins each, to participants in person. Sessions are designed to be delivered approximately weekly. Providers have the option to deliver up to 2 additional "booster sessions" to participants who may benefit from additional care.
Behavioral: mhGAP-Standard
Four in-person sessions with up to two booster sessions following the principles of World Health Organization's Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-reported alcohol use
Time Frame: Change from baseline to approximately 8-weeks follow-up [range 6--16 weeks]
Self-report using the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT). Higher scores indicate more alcohol use and associated problems.
Change from baseline to approximately 8-weeks follow-up [range 6--16 weeks]

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-reported alcohol use
Time Frame: Change from baseline to approximately 20-weeks [range >16--28 weeks] and 32-weeks follow-up [range >28--40 weeks]
Self-report using the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT). Higher scores indicate more alcohol use and associated problems.
Change from baseline to approximately 20-weeks [range >16--28 weeks] and 32-weeks follow-up [range >28--40 weeks]
Biomarker phosphatidylethanol (PEth)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to approximately 8-weeks [range 6--16 weeks], 20-weeks [range >16--28 weeks], and 32-weeks follow-up [range >28--40 weeks]
PEth concentration in dried blood spots
Change from baseline to approximately 8-weeks [range 6--16 weeks], 20-weeks [range >16--28 weeks], and 32-weeks follow-up [range >28--40 weeks]

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HIV viral load
Time Frame: Change from baseline to approximately 8-weeks [range 6--16 weeks], 20-weeks [range >16--28 weeks], and 32-weeks follow-up [range >28--40 weeks]
For patients with HIV, number of copies of HIV per millimeter in dried blood spots
Change from baseline to approximately 8-weeks [range 6--16 weeks], 20-weeks [range >16--28 weeks], and 32-weeks follow-up [range >28--40 weeks]
Liver function
Time Frame: Change from baseline to approximately 8-weeks [range 6--16 weeks], 20-weeks [range >16--28 weeks], and 32-weeks follow-up [range >28--40 weeks]
Aspartate Aminotransferase and Alanine Aminotransferase in whole blood
Change from baseline to approximately 8-weeks [range 6--16 weeks], 20-weeks [range >16--28 weeks], and 32-weeks follow-up [range >28--40 weeks]

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
SolidarMed

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer M. Belus, PhD, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 11, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 10, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 14, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 29, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 19, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ID02-2023
  • U1111-1292-9288 (Other Identifier: World Health Organization)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The relevant anonymized data and statistical code will be deposited alongside the published peer-reviewed papers, in alignment with data sharing and verification procedures. Other investigators wishing to access the data for additional analyses can contact the study PI so that the appropriate documents (e.g., data sharing, ethics approvals) can be arranged.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

A de-identified dataset will be deposited in an open-access data repository at the end of the project and once the objectives specified in the protocol have been addressed.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data can be accessed by the public, through creation of an account with Open Science Foundation, an open-access data repository.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings