Combination Therapy of Different Antidepressants With Dietary Supplements

September 8, 2023 updated by: Riphah International University

Comparative Efficacy of Antidepressants With L-methylfolate, B12, and Magnesium in Depressive Disorders

The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the effect of antidepressants in combination with different dietary supplements in patients with depression. Our main objective is to compare the efficacy of antidepressants in combination with either L-methyl folate, Vit B12, or magnesium) in patients with depressive disorders. The levels of depressive symptoms as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) at base level and during follow-up.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is an open-label study assessing the comparative efficacy of antidepressants in combination therapy of either L-methylfolate, mecobalamin, or magnesium in patients with Depressive Disorder. The plan is to enroll 84 patients with depression based on Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) score of 9 and above, which is a valid and reliable Structured Clinical Interview. The investigators will collect data from the enrolled patient populations. The participants will be able to receive their results, on request, upon completion of the study. The investigators hypothesize that depressive symptoms can be improved by the addition of above mentioned nutritional supplementations with antidepressant medication.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
88

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Pakistan
    • Punjab
      • Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan
        • Pakistan Railway Hospital, IIMC-T, Riphah International University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with Depressive Disorder having PHQ-9 Score 9 and above
  • Age 12 and above
  • Patients having low/marginal and low normal levels for arms 2 and 3 of respective supplements
  • Patients having low/normal serum magnesium for arm 4

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients having psychiatric diagnosis other than Depressive Disorder according to the International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11)
  • History of kidney disease, myasthenia gravis
  • Mentally handicapped or terminally ill patients
  • Age less than 12 years
  • Patients already taking multiple nutritional supplements
  • Patients on polypharmacy with potential interactions with antidepressants and supplements in this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Antidepressant
Participants receive either escitalopram 10-20mg, sertraline 50-100mg, fluoxetine 20-40mg, duloxetine 30-60mg, mirtazapine 15-30mg, venlafaxine 75-150mg, trazodone 50-100mg, amitriptyline 25-75mg, or clomipramine 25-75mg orally daily for 4 weeks.
Experimental: Antidepressant and L-methylfolate
Participants receive a combination of antidepressant and L-methylfolate 400µg twice daily orally for 4 weeks
Dietary supplement: L-methylfolate
Participants receive L-methylfolate 400µg orally twice daily for 4 weeks
Other Names:
  • 5-methyl-terahydrofolate
Experimental: Antidepressant and injectable mecobalamin
Participants receive a combination of antidepressant and mecobalamin 500µg intramuscularly stat on alternate days (6 total injections)
Dietary supplement: Vitamin B12
Participants receive mecobalamin 500µg intramuscularly stat on alternate days (6 total injections)
Other Names:
  • mecobalamin
Experimental: Antidepressant and Magnesium
Participants receive a combination of antidepressant and magnesium glycinate 400mg (Elemental: ≈120mg) twice daily orally for 4 weeks
Dietary supplement: magnesium
Participants receive magnesium glycinate 400mg twice daily orally for 4 weeks (elemental 120mg approx.)
Other Names:
  • Mg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
The change in the total PHQ-9 score between baseline and 4-weeks follow-up is the primary outcome measure. This measure is a patient-rated inventory of depressive symptoms. All items are scored on scales ranging from 0-3 and the sum of the scores provides the total score for the measure. On this scale, higher scores indicate poorer outcomes. Scores 9-19 and 20-27 are considered moderate and severe depression respectively.
Baseline and 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-weeks and 4-weeks
The change in the total PHQ-9 score between baseline, and the intermediate 2-weeks, and 4-weeks follow-up is the secondary outcome measures. This measure is a patient-rated inventory of depressive symptoms. All items are scored on scales ranging from 0-3 and the sum of the scores provides the total score for the measure. On this scale, higher scores indicate poorer outcomes. Scores 9-19 and 20-27 are considered moderate and severe depression respectively.
Baseline, 2-weeks and 4-weeks
Side-effects
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-weeks, and 4-weeks follow up
A self-assessment questionnaire for undesirable effects in psychopharmacological treatment, developed by the Department of Psychiatry, Riphah International University, Pakistan. This is to investigate the presence or absence of 4 symptoms (diarrhea, drowsiness, insomnia, and rash), and their relationship with the treatment.
Baseline, 2-weeks, and 4-weeks follow up
Depressive symptoms remission
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks
Remission rate of Major Depression in the two groups over the course of treatment, defining remission as a score ≤ 4 on the PHQ-9 scale.
Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Riphah International University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Afifa Siddique, MBBS, IIMC-T, Riphah International University, Rawalpindi

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 5, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 14, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 26, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 8, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Riphah/IIMC/IRC/22/2069

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings