ETGBD in Surgically Unfit Patients With Both Choledocholithiasis and Cholecystolithiasis (ETGBD)

July 5, 2023 updated by: Woo Hyun Paik, Seoul National University Hospital

Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage for Prevention of Biliary Complication in Surgically Unfit Patients With Both Choledocholithiasis and Cholecystolithiasis

Cholecystectomy is recommended for patients with both gallbladder (GB) and common bile duct (CBD) stones to prevent recurrent biliary complications, unless there are specific reasons for surgery is considered inappropriate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of transpapillary gallbladder stent placement in surgically unfit patients with both CBD stone and gallstone.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Gallstones affect 10-15% of the adult population, and 10-25% of them may develop biliary pain or complications. Patients with symptomatic gallstones often have a concomitant CBD stone in 10-20% of them. Most gallstones do not require invasive treatment due to their benign natural history, but CBD stones should be removed due to the risk of developing gallstone-related complications such as obstructive cholangitis and acute gallstone pancreatitis. CBD stones result mainly from the migration of gallstones into the bile duct, so the gold standard treatment for gallstones with CBD stones is endoscopic removal of the CBD stone followed by cholecystectomy to prevent recurrent biliary complications, such as calculous cholangitis or acute cholecystitis.

However, patients who were ineligible for surgery due to high-risk conditions, including the elderly, critically ill status, and severe underlying morbidities, may not get the chance to undergo cholecystectomy. Initial nonoperative management with delayed cholecystectomy has been considered as an alternative treatment, but laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduces the rate of major complications compared with percutaneous gallbladder drainage, even in high-risk patients, and outcomes after early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in octogenarians are comparable to younger patients. Despite this evidence, there are still debates among experts for optimal treatment methods for high-risk patients for surgery with symptomatic CBD stone with gallstone, and gallbladder drainage therapy first to perform for stabilization with surgery rather than urgent cholecystectomy in real practice. Therefore, there is still an unmet need for how to prevent recurrence of CBD stones in patients with concomitant gallstones after endoscopic removal of CBD stones.

Nonsurgical cholecystic drainage methods, including percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD), endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD), and endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD), have been introduced and actively used as a bridge or alternative therapy in patients at high risk for surgery. Several studies have reported the results of its feasibility and efficacy, mainly focusing on the management of patients with acute cholecystitis. However, the evidence for appropriate management considering non-surgical treatments for patients with both CBD stones and gallstones is still limited. This study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of ETGBD for patients with both CBD stone and gallstones to prevent recurrent biliary complications in patients at high risk for surgery.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
302

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

From January 2010 to March 2022, 302 patients with both choledocholithiasis and cholecystolithiasis who were at high surgical risk, were reviewed retrospectively. All 302 patients were initially treated with endoscopic CBD stone removal.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

(i) age ≥20 years (ii) presence of choledocolithiasis and cholecystolithiasis on imaging studies (iii) surgically unfit for cholecystectomy.

Exclusion Criteria:

(i) presence of malignant biliary obstruction (ii) follow-up of less than 1 month (iii) previous EST status (iv) pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrence of biliary complications
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 year
The primary outcome measures were biliary complications, including acute cholecystitis, acute cholangitis, recurrence of choledocolithiasis, and biliary colic. The diagnosis of acute cholangitis, acute cholecystitis were based on Tokyo guideline 18.
through study completion, an average of 2 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Seoul National University Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Myeong Hwan Lee, M.D, Seoul National University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 27, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 7, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 5, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2305-030-1429

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Due to the sensitive nature of the subject of this work and also the clinical data used, our healthboard stipulates that raw data should remain confidential and not be shared.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Efficacy

Clinical Trials on ERCP(Endoscopic retrograde choangiopancreatography), ETGBD(endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings