Team Work and Creative Self-Efficacy

March 17, 2026 updated by: Chiu Shu-Ching, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology

The Influence of Task-Oriented Learning on College Students' Creative Self-Efficacy

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of teamwork-based task learning on college students' cognition, attitudes, skills, and creative self-efficacy, and to explore its impact within innovative technology learning contexts.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

250

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
      • Taichung, Taiwan, 406
        • Recruiting
        • Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: College students aged 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Students who are 65 years or older, not enrolled in nursing programs, or currently on leave of absence.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: experimental group
robot backend design and control training
Behavioral: robot training
robot backend design and control training
Other Names:
  • service learning
Other: control group
Traditional class (not-robot )
Other: control group
Traditional class (not-robot )

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Creative Self-Efficacy scale
Time Frame: A pre- and post-test/ up to 10 weeks
Higher scores indicate more positive outcomes
A pre- and post-test/ up to 10 weeks
team work scale
Time Frame: A pre- and post-test/ up to 10 weeks
Higher scores indicate more positive outcomes
A pre- and post-test/ up to 10 weeks
perception of robots
Time Frame: A pre- and post-test/ up to 10 weeks
Higher scores indicate more positive outcomes
A pre- and post-test/ up to 10 weeks
functional safety scale
Time Frame: A pre- and post-test/ up to 10 weeks
Higher scores indicate more positive outcomes
A pre- and post-test/ up to 10 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reflective Journal
Time Frame: post-test/immediately after the intervention
Based on your personal experience, please describe the current functions of robots or other smart technologies, your expectations for their future use in work settings, and your learning experiences with other smart technologies.
post-test/immediately after the intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
age
Time Frame: Day 1
18-65 years
Day 1
sex
Time Frame: Day 1
man, female
Day 1
grade
Time Frame: Day 1
grade1-grade 4
Day 1
work1
Time Frame: Day 1
years
Day 1
work2
Time Frame: Day 1
Type of job
Day 1
work3
Time Frame: Day 1
Job title
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shu Ching Chiu, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 24, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 28, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2510300001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Self-Efficacy

Clinical Trials on robot training

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Rwanda

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe