ETGBD in Surgically Unfit Patients With Both Choledocholithiasis and Cholecystolithiasis (ETGBD)

July 5, 2023 updated by: Woo Hyun Paik, Seoul National University Hospital

Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage for Prevention of Biliary Complication in Surgically Unfit Patients With Both Choledocholithiasis and Cholecystolithiasis

Cholecystectomy is recommended for patients with both gallbladder (GB) and common bile duct (CBD) stones to prevent recurrent biliary complications, unless there are specific reasons for surgery is considered inappropriate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of transpapillary gallbladder stent placement in surgically unfit patients with both CBD stone and gallstone.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Gallstones affect 10-15% of the adult population, and 10-25% of them may develop biliary pain or complications. Patients with symptomatic gallstones often have a concomitant CBD stone in 10-20% of them. Most gallstones do not require invasive treatment due to their benign natural history, but CBD stones should be removed due to the risk of developing gallstone-related complications such as obstructive cholangitis and acute gallstone pancreatitis. CBD stones result mainly from the migration of gallstones into the bile duct, so the gold standard treatment for gallstones with CBD stones is endoscopic removal of the CBD stone followed by cholecystectomy to prevent recurrent biliary complications, such as calculous cholangitis or acute cholecystitis.

However, patients who were ineligible for surgery due to high-risk conditions, including the elderly, critically ill status, and severe underlying morbidities, may not get the chance to undergo cholecystectomy. Initial nonoperative management with delayed cholecystectomy has been considered as an alternative treatment, but laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduces the rate of major complications compared with percutaneous gallbladder drainage, even in high-risk patients, and outcomes after early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in octogenarians are comparable to younger patients. Despite this evidence, there are still debates among experts for optimal treatment methods for high-risk patients for surgery with symptomatic CBD stone with gallstone, and gallbladder drainage therapy first to perform for stabilization with surgery rather than urgent cholecystectomy in real practice. Therefore, there is still an unmet need for how to prevent recurrence of CBD stones in patients with concomitant gallstones after endoscopic removal of CBD stones.

Nonsurgical cholecystic drainage methods, including percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD), endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD), and endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD), have been introduced and actively used as a bridge or alternative therapy in patients at high risk for surgery. Several studies have reported the results of its feasibility and efficacy, mainly focusing on the management of patients with acute cholecystitis. However, the evidence for appropriate management considering non-surgical treatments for patients with both CBD stones and gallstones is still limited. This study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of ETGBD for patients with both CBD stone and gallstones to prevent recurrent biliary complications in patients at high risk for surgery.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

302

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

From January 2010 to March 2022, 302 patients with both choledocholithiasis and cholecystolithiasis who were at high surgical risk, were reviewed retrospectively. All 302 patients were initially treated with endoscopic CBD stone removal.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

(i) age ≥20 years (ii) presence of choledocolithiasis and cholecystolithiasis on imaging studies (iii) surgically unfit for cholecystectomy.

Exclusion Criteria:

(i) presence of malignant biliary obstruction (ii) follow-up of less than 1 month (iii) previous EST status (iv) pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrence of biliary complications
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 year
The primary outcome measures were biliary complications, including acute cholecystitis, acute cholangitis, recurrence of choledocolithiasis, and biliary colic. The diagnosis of acute cholangitis, acute cholecystitis were based on Tokyo guideline 18.
through study completion, an average of 2 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Seoul National University Hospital

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Myeong Hwan Lee, M.D, Seoul National University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2305-030-1429

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Due to the sensitive nature of the subject of this work and also the clinical data used, our healthboard stipulates that raw data should remain confidential and not be shared.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Efficacy

Clinical Trials on ERCP(Endoscopic retrograde choangiopancreatography), ETGBD(endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Finland

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe