Virtual Reality Assisted Patient Empowerment: Diagnose ATTR-Amyloidosis And Start Treatment (VRAP-DAAST)

July 3, 2023 updated by: Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf
ATTR amyloidosis is a serious condition with significant morbidity and mortality. In Germany, there are numerous unreported cases of untreated patients, and diagnosing and initiating treatment often requires multiple specialized tests. To address this, a study is being conducted to determine if virtual reality (VR)-based patient education can improve diagnosis rates, treatment initiation, and medication adherence compared to standard education methods.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Tafamidis is effective in reducing mortality and hospitalization in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), and adherence to the drug is generally high. However, the main challenge lies in timely diagnosis and initiation of therapy. Virtual reality (VR) offers an immersive educational tool that surpasses conventional methods like brochures and videos, with patients preferring VR glasses. By preparing patients through VR, they can engage in informed conversations with physicians, understand the diagnostic process better, and be motivated to initiate therapy promptly. VR empowers patients and saves valuable time for physicians, and it has been well-received even among older cardiovascular patients

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Germany
    • NRW
      • Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany, 40225
        • University-Hospital Düsseldorf Division of Cardiology, Pulmonary Disease and Vascular Medicine [Recruiting] Düsseldorf, Germany, 40225
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients who present themselves for assessment of an unclear septal thickening with suspicion of cardiac amyloidosis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. < 18 years
  2. Active Medication with tafamidis
  3. Cardiovascular Disease
  4. highly impaired vision or hearing
  5. advanced dementia syndrome
  6. epilepsy
  7. insufficient language skills

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Control Group
Usual Care
Experimental: intervention
In this intervention, VR glasses with an information module are utilized, lasting approximately 25 minutes. This intervention takes place in the waiting room prior to the actual physician-patient conversation and complements the usual care provided through brochures
Device: Intervention
Virtual Reality assisted information Patients in the intervention group receive a VR instructional application lasting approximately 25 minutes. This intervention takes place in the waiting room prior to the actual physician-patient conversation and complements the usual care provided through brochures.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time-to-Event
Time Frame: up to 180 days

Count days after first use of VR until the final diagnosis or prescription of tafamidis is given. [time frame: xx days]

1. Time-to-Event [days] Count days after first use of VR until the final diagnosis or prescription of tafamidis is given. [time frame: xx days]

Count days after first use of VR until the final diagnosis or prescription of tafamidis is given
up to 180 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration patient-physician talk
Time Frame: up to 30 minutes
Duration of the patient-physician talk in minutes.
up to 30 minutes
Drug-Adherence to tafamidis
Time Frame: after 6 months after enrollment
Drug-Adherence to tafamidis (yes/no/unknown)
after 6 months after enrollment
health literacy: Baseline
Time Frame: 1 hour before patient-physician talk after enrollment
In order to test to assess the health literacy at baseline, a health literacy questionnaire will be asked
1 hour before patient-physician talk after enrollment
Health literacy: after the first patient-physician-talk
Time Frame: 1 hour after patient-physician talk]
In order to test to what extent the addition of a combination of different learning modalities (acoustic, visual, written, haptic) implemented in virtual reality to the medico-legal informed consent is superior to the standard informed consent, a survey is conducted after the informed consent using a health literacy questionnaire
1 hour after patient-physician talk]
Health literacy baseline: Long term
Time Frame: up to 180 days after patient-physician talk
In order to test to what extent the addition of a combination of different learning modalities (acoustic, visual, written, haptic) implemented in virtual reality to the medico-legal informed consent is superior to the standard informed consent, a survey is conducted after the informed consent in terms of long term effects using a health literacy questionnaire
up to 180 days after patient-physician talk
Rate of patients who died or were re-hospitalized during the long term follow up
Time Frame: after 6 and 12 months after enrollment
patients are contacted and information is gathered about survival of the patients and possible rehospitalization events due to cardiac events
after 6 and 12 months after enrollment
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Time Frame: after 6 months after enrollment
KCCQ will be used to assess the general the patient's perception of their health status. In the KCCQ-12, responses are given on a Likert scale that for each individual item is scored on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores indicating better health
after 6 months after enrollment
Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ)
Time Frame: immediately after Virtual Reality (VR-) Education
A SSQ will assess for VR associated compatibility. SSQ asks participants to provide subjective severity ratings of 16 symptoms on a scale from 0 (no perception) to 3 (severe perception) after the exposure. Total scores can be associated with negligible (< 5), minimal (5 - 10), significant (10 - 15), and concerning (15 - 20) symptoms
immediately after Virtual Reality (VR-) Education

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Christian Jung, Prof. Dr., Division of Cardiology, Pulmonary Disease and Vascular Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 20, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 3, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 10, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 3, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings