Magnesium Versus Prochlorperazine Versus Metoclopramide for Migraines (MAGraine)

October 2, 2024 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of the Effects of Magnesium Compared to Conventional Therapy on Acute Migraine

This investigation describes a proposed clinical trial that will evaluate the relative efficacy of intravenous magnesium sulfate for the treatment of migraine compared to intravenous metoclopramide (Reglan) and intravenous prochlorperazine (Compazine) in the treatment of acute headache and migraine in adult patients. The ultimate objective will be clinical application of these drugs in the emergency department for the treatment of acute headache and migraine.

The two phenothiazines (metoclopramide and prochlorperazine) have been routinely utilized in the treatment of acute headache and migraine in the emergency department setting. Per the 2017 American Headache Society guidelines, both intravenous metoclopramide and intravenous procholorperazine are recommended as "clinicians should offer" agents with level B evidence. Of note, there are no agents with level A evidence purported by this guideline for acute management of migraine. The same guideline offers "no recommendation can be made regarding the role of intravenous magnesium for adults who present to the ED with acute migraine. However intravenous magnesium may be of benefit to patients who present with migraine with aura." Multiple trials have evaluated intravenous magnesium's safety and efficacy in the management of acute migraine. These have demonstrated the tolerability of intravenous magnesium on a with breadth of patients. Most commonly the primary adverse event was flushing which self-resolved. No cases of hypotension were reported.

None of these study agents have been withdrawn from the market.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Migraine or severe headache affected one-fifth of women and one-tenth of men in 2015 and is one of the leading causes of disability in the world. Over one million visits to emergency departments (ED) in the US are due to migraines. Migraine, previously believed to be a vascular disorder, is caused by inflammation due to vasodilation in the meninges secondary to the release of vasoactive neuropeptides by stimulation of the trigeminal nerve. This inflammation can result in symptoms such as headache, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, photophobia and phonophobia.

Despite migraine being a common disorder, there has yet to be a cure. Several classes of medications have been studied for the treatment of migraine. Recently, conventional therapy has shifted to the use of antidopaminergics including prochlorperazine, metoclopramide and haloperidol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as ibuprofen and naproxen, and triptans, sumatriptan being the most commonly utilized. 5Although intravenous opioids have historically been the most common treatment for migraines, their use has fallen out of favor due to their association with increased recurrence of headaches and ED visits, abuse potential, and most recently severe intravenous opiate shortage. Alternative treatments include ketamine, propofol, dihydroergotamine and magnesium.

Magnesium is an intracellular cation that has been associated with both the function of serotonin and regulation of vascular tone, which are both mechanisms that implicate its role in the treatment of migraine. Intravenous magnesium sulfate has been studied as a treatment for migraine compared to placebo, metoclopramide and prochlorperazine. These studies have shown that magnesium is well-tolerated with a good safety profile and may be efficacious in the treatment of migraine. Metoclopramide, prochlorperazine and magnesium have been recommended in clinical practice guidelines and have become routine standard of care for treatment of migraine in this emergency department. However, no trial has evaluated these modalities simultaneously in the same population. The purpose of our study is to compare the relative efficacy for magnesium, metoclopramide, and prochlorperazine in the treatment of headache and migraine.

Via monthly block randomization, patients will be given one of three guideline recommended study drugs. Allocation will be concealed by a pharmacist (not participating in the rest of the study) solely designated to choose which drug will be the assigned study drug for each month. The pharmacists, physicians, and nurses participating in administration of the medications will be blinded to which drug is being administered during each month. Metoclopramide, prochlorperazine and magnesium have been recommended in clinical practice guidelines and have become routine standard of care for treatment of migraine in this emergency department. All three study drugs will be stored in the investigational medication refrigerator located in the main pharmacy. A pharmacist on duty in the emergency department will obtain the medication from the refrigerator and deliver it to the bedside nurse who is actively caring for the patient after an order from the physician.

The primary outcome of this study will be mean change in pain from baseline to 30 minutes after initiation of infusion (as defined on a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale. Secondary endpoints include mean change in pain from baseline to 60 minutes and 120 minutes after initiation of infusion (as defined on a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale), time to emergency department discharge, and adverse effects due to administration of study drug (hypotension, flushing, akathisia, dystonia, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, drowsiness, other self-reported adverse effects).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
157

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Illinois
      • Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States, 60453
        • Advocate Christ Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years or older
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Primary diagnosis of headache or migraine
  • Between October 1, 2018 to April 1, 2020
  • Presenting to Advocate Christ Medical Center emergency department and meet clinical assessment per physician

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy defined as a positive urine HCG
  • Stated history of renal impairment
  • Allergy or sensitivity to any study drugs
  • Concomitant treatment at the time of study drug administered in the emergency department
  • Patients with a history of this study participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Metoclopramide
Metoclopramide 10mg in 50ml D5W over 20 minutes
Drug: Metoclopramide 10mg
Metoclopramide 10mg in 50ml D5W over 20 minutes
Active Comparator: Prochlorperazine
Prochlorperazine in 50ml D5W over 20 minutes
Drug: Prochlorperazine (Compazine) Injection
Prochlorperazine 10mg in 50ml D5W over 20 minutes
Experimental: Magnesium
Magnesium Sulfate 2gm in 50ml D5W over 20 minutes
Drug: Magnesium Sulfate
Magnesium Sulfate 2gm in 50ml D5W over 20 minutes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
30 Minute Pain Score
Time Frame: 30 minutes after initiation
Scores range from 0-10. A higher score, denotes more pain
30 minutes after initiation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of Stay
Time Frame: From time of arrival to time of discharge.
Emergency Department Length of stay. Measured from time of arrival to time of discharged documented in the electronic medical record.
From time of arrival to time of discharge.
Need for Rescue Analgesia
Time Frame: From time of arrival to time of discharge.
Percentage of participants who had necessity for rescue analgesics after study drug administration
From time of arrival to time of discharge.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Michael Cirone, MD, Advocate Christ Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 23, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 6, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 26, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 2, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AHC-7192-D5000322

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Migraine

Clinical Trials on Magnesium Sulfate

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings