Comparison Between Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Magnesium Sulphate Versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Dexmedetomidine in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgeries

February 27, 2026 updated by: AbdElKhalik Mahmoud Shaban, Cairo University

Comparison Between Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Magnesium Sulphate Versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Dexmedetomidine in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgeries on Extubation Time: A Randomized Double-Blinded Comparative Study

Although total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) provides advantages such as accelerated recuperation and diminished postoperative nausea, it also has constraints, such as the potential for hemodynamic instability and inadequate analgesia. TIVA is less suitable for major surgeries, particularly those involving the spine, when used alone, due to these limitations, as they necessitate substantial muscle relaxation and pain management.

A non-competitive antagonist of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, magnesium sulfate (MgSO4), exhibits antinociceptive properties. The infusion of Magnesium during general anesthesia has been shown to decrease the need for anesthesia and the consumption of postoperative analgesics in numerous clinical studies. MgSO4, when utilized as an adjunct to TIVA, has been demonstrated to decrease the duration of extubation, facilitate earlier emergence from anesthesia, and facilitate intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IOM) during spine surgery.

Dexmedetomidine is a selective α2-adrenoreceptor agonist whose sedative effects are predominantly mediated by its action on α-2 adrenergic receptors in the brain and spinal cord. It delivers efficient sedation without the pronounced respiratory depression that is frequently observed with other sedatives. Dexmedetomidine induces a profound sense of tranquility and alleviates anxiety by selectively targeting specific receptors in the central nervous system, in addition to offering analgesic advantages. Dexmedetomidine has been employed in the surgical intensive care unit to expedite the extubation process. Dexmedetomidine is now being utilized more frequently as an adjuvant for propofol-based TIVA in procedures that necessitateintraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.

There is a paucity of literature comparing TIVA with magnesium sulphate and TIVA with dexmedetomidine in spine surgeries.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II.
  • Scheduled for elective spine surgery up to two levels under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of preoperative neuromuscular disease, hepatic impairment [defined as a known diagnosis of liver cirrhosis, hepatitis with elevated liver enzymes (>2 times upper standard limit), or Child-Pugh score B or C], renal impairment [defined as chronic kidney disease with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m² or history of dialysis], endocrinal disorders [including uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (HbA1c >8.5%), thyroid dysfunction (untreated hypo/hyperthyroidism), or adrenal insufficiency], hematological disorder [such as anemia (Hb <10 g/dL), coagulopathies (INR >1.5, platelet count <100,000/mm³), or bleeding diathesis] or cardiovascular dysfunction [defined as history of ischemic heart disease, arrhythmias requiring treatment, heart failure (NYHA class II or higher), or uncontrolled hypertension (SBP >160 mmHg or DBP >100 mmHg)].
  • Any degree of heart block.
  • Known allergy to the study drugs.
  • Scoliosis surgery.
  • Cervical spine surgeries.
  • Surgeries with an anticipated duration of more than 4 hours.
  • Receiving magnesium supplementation.
  • Any Preoperative Disturbed consciousness level or cognitive dysfunction.
  • Drugs known to have a significant interaction with NMDAs.
  • Chronic use of opioids and current treatment with a β-blocker or calcium channel blocker.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group D
Patients will receive a dexmedetomidine loading dose of 1 µg/kg before induction over a period of 15 min and maintenance of 0.5 µg/kg/h throughout the surgery
Active Comparator: Group M
Patients will receive a magnesium sulfate loading dose of 50 mg/kg before induction over a period of 15 min and maintenance at 15 mg/kg/h throughout the surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Extubation time
Time Frame: Up to 2 hours after surgery
Time from stoppage of TIVA infusion till extubation of the endotracheal tube
Up to 2 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to the first request for the rescue analgesia
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours after surgery
time from the end of surgery to the first dose of morphine administrated
Up to 24 hours after surgery
Total morphine consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
24 hours postoperative
Ramsay Sedation score
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
1, anxious or restless or both; 2, cooperative, oriented, relaxed; 3, responding to commands; 4, brisk response to stimulus; 5, sluggish response to stimulus; 6, no response to stimulus
24 hours postoperative
Degree of patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
Will be assessed on a 5-point Likert scale (1, extremely dissatisfied; 2, unsatisfied; 3, neutral; 4, satisfied; 5, extremely satisfied
24 hours postoperative
Incidence of adverse events
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
24 hours postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Emergence From Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on Dexmedetomidine (Precedex®)

Subscribe