A Study of Jincaopian Tablets on Chronic Pelvic Pain After Pelvic Inflammatory Disease

October 15, 2024 updated by: Beijing Konruns Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Dose-parallel, Placebo-controlled Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Jincaopian Tablets in Subjects with Chronic Pelvic Pain After Pelvic Inflammatory Disease

The objective of this phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Jincaopian Tablets in the treatment of subjects with chronic pelvic pain after pelvic inflammatory disease

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Chronic pelvic pain is the major sequela of pelvic inflammatory disease and it's a common, burdensome, and costly condition that disproportionately affects women. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, dose-parallel, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Jincaopian Tablets in the treatment of subjects with chronic pelvic pain after pelvic inflammatory disease. In this trial, 414 subjects were enrolled and randomized to either "Jincaopian Tablets" group, or the "placebo" group in a 2:1 ratio. The treatment period is 12 weeks and the follow-up period is 4 weeks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
414

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Xiuxiang Teng
  • Phone Number: +86 010-87906734
  • Email: tengxx@126.com

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China
        • Recruiting
        • Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine affiliated to Capital Medical University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Xiuxiang Teng

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Meet the diagnostic criteria for chronic pelvic pain sequelae of pelvic inflammatory disease;
  • The average VAS score of pain in the week before enrollment is ≥4;
  • The McCormack scale of physical signs at the time of enrollment is 4 to 12 points (including 4 points and 12 points);
  • Women aged 18 to 50 (including 18 and 50) with a history of sexual life;
  • Voluntarily participate in this clinical trial, give informed consent and sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pelvic inflammatory disease (acute attack);
  • Pregnant or lactating women, women of childbearing age who are unwilling to take effective measures to prevent pregnancy during the trial and within 6 months after the trial;
  • Previously diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, primary/secondary dysmenorrhea, pelvic stasis syndrome and chronic pelvic pain caused by other non-pelvic inflammatory diseases;
  • Complicated with specific vaginitis such as vulvovaginal candidiasis, trichomonas vaginitis, bacterial vaginosis;
  • Gynecological tumors (maximum diameter of uterine fibroids greater than 3cm and submucosal fibroids), endometriosis, adenomyosis, acute cervicitis, tuberculous pelvic inflammatory disease, interstitial cystitis and other diseases related symptoms;
  • Placement of intrauterine device in the past 3 months; absence of uterus and bilateral appendages;
  • Received related treatment or took drugs with similar functions and indications within 14 days before the introduction;
  • Liver function: ALT or AST>1.5 times the upper limit of normal value；Renal function：Scr>1.0 times the upper limit of normal value;
  • Serum CA125 and erythrocyte sedimentation > 1.1 times the upper limit of normal value.
  • Combined with serious cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, hematopoietic system and other serious diseases;
  • Have an allergic history to the experimental drug;
  • Have a long history of alcoholism or drug abuse;
  • Intellectual disabilities or mental disorders;
  • Participated in other clinical trials within the past 3 months;
  • The investigator believes that it is not suitable to participate in this clinical trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Jincaopian Tablets group
Patients receive Jincaopian Tablets 0.6g/day for 12 weeks.
Drug: Jincaopian Tablets
Jincaopian Tablets 0.2g tid p.o.
Other Names:
  • ZY5301
Placebo Comparator: Placebo group
Patients receive a placebo 0.6g/day for 12 weeks.
Other: Placebo
Placebo 0.2g tid p.o.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain disappearance rate after 12 weeks of treatment
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
The pain disappearance referred to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score becoming 0-1 points, and was no longer greater than or equal to 2 points at any subsequent evaluation. The pain disappearance rate was defined as the proportion of patients who achieved a pain disappearance after treatment.
12 Weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain disappearance rate after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment
Time Frame: 8 Weeks
The pain disappearance referred to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score becoming 0-1 points, and was no longer greater than or equal to 2 points at any subsequent evaluation. The pain disappearance rate was defined as the proportion of patients who achieved a pain disappearance after treatment.
8 Weeks
Change of weekly average Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score from baseline after 12 weeks of treatment
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate pelvic pain degree. The VAS score ranged from 0 to 10, and a higher score represented greater pain intensity. The average VAS value for a week was calculated by dividing the sum of the scores for each day of the week by the number of days the score was recorded.
12 Weeks
The area under the VAS score-time curve
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
AUC under the curve to evaluating pain levels
12 Weeks
McCormick Scale
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
The McCormack scale was used to score the patient's physical signs. The total score is 36 points, rated from twelve aspects including uterine tenderness (divided into four quadrants), abdominal tenderness or rebound pain (divided into four quadrants), left or right adnexal tenderness, uterine tenderness, and cervical lifting and swinging pain. The scoring criteria was as following: no pain is 0 points; Mild pain without facial expression changes and muscle tension is 1 point; Pain accompanied by facial expressions and muscle tension is 2 points; Pain drama is 3 points.
12 Weeks
General quality of life (Short Form-12) scale
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
The Short Form-12 is an abbreviated version of the original 36-item QOL questionnaire. It comprises 12 items with a mental component summary (MCS) and a physical component summary (PCS). Possible scores for mental and physical health-related QOL subscales range from 0 to 100 points, and a higher score is interpreted as better QOL.
12 Weeks
Disease efficacy evaluation
Time Frame: 12 Weeks

Disease efficacy was determined based on the change of the clinical signs and symptoms.

Based on the evaluation criteria, the Disease efficacy was recorded as Clinical recovery, significant effect, effectiveness, and ineffectiveness.

Clinical recovery: The symptoms and signs disappear, and the integral values of symptoms, signs, and auxiliary examinations decrease by ≥ 95%.

Significant effect: The symptoms and signs are significantly reduced, with a reduction of ≥ 70% and<95% in the score of symptoms, signs, and auxiliary examinations.

Effective: Symptoms and signs have been alleviated, with a reduction of ≥ 30% and<70% in symptom, sign, and auxiliary examination scores.

Invalid: No reduction or aggravation of symptoms and signs, with a decrease of<30% in the score of symptoms, signs, and auxiliary examinations
12 Weeks
Adverse events (AEs)
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
Incidence of treatment-related AEs
12 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Beijing Konruns Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Xiuxiang Teng, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 8, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 11, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 29, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 15, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Z-JCP-T-Ⅲ-2021-BJKC-01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pelvic Pain

Clinical Trials on Jincaopian Tablets

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings