PATH Program for for Severely Frail or Cognitively Impaired Patients Scheduled for Cancer Surgery.
Application of the Palliative and Therapeutic Harmonization (PATH) Program for Shared-decision Making for Severely Frail or Cognitively Impaired Patients Scheduled for Cancer Surgery: a Randomized Control Trial.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
At Nova Scotia Health Authority (NSHA), geriatric medicine colleagues developed a preoperative palliative and therapeutic harmonization (PATH) clinic with the following objectives:
- Assess medical conditions, health trajectory, and baseline frailty.
- Conduct an in-depth discussion with the patient (or their substitute decision maker) to review medical conditions and how frailty stage impacts decision-making about surgery.
- Co-develop a care plan, including ways to optimize health.
The investigators have elaborated a single center randomized cohort trial for patients aged 75 and older, screened as severely frail or cognitively impaired scheduled for curative or palliative-intent surgery for bronchopulmonary, oropharyngeal, orthopaedic, gynaecological, breast, genitourinary or gastrointestinal cancers (proven or clinically highly suspicious cancer).
Patients enrolled in the trial will be randomized to standard of care preoperative assessment versus PATH geriatric care arm.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Richard Spence, MD, FRCSC
- Phone Number: 1 647 612 5904
- Email: Richard.Spence@dal.ca
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Damsadie Hannedige, BSc, MSc
- Phone Number: 902-225-8972
- Email: damsadie.hannedige@nshealth.ca
Study Locations
-
-
Nova Scotia
-
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 2Y9
- Recruiting
- QEII, Victoria General Hospital
-
Contact:
- Richard Spence
- Phone Number: 647-612-5904
-
Contact:
- Damsadie Hannedige
- Phone Number: 902-225-8972
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients must have a clinically highly suspicious or pathologically confirmed diagnosis of bronchopulmonary, oropharyngeal (including head and neck surgery), orthopaedic, gynaecological, breast, genitourinary or gastrointestinal cancer surgery.
- Patients must be scheduled and consented for curative or palliative intent surgery.
- Patients must be aged 75 or older.
- Patients must be screened by the CFS to have:
4a. Mild or greater frailty (CFS equal or greater than 5) due to cognitive impairment.
4b. Moderate or greater frailty (CFS equal or greater than 6) due to medical/physical conditions.
5. Informed consent for participation must be received.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients cannot be a resident in a long-term care facility prior to the cancer diagnosis.
- Urgent/ emergent cases are excluded.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Standard of care
Patients will undergo the usual preoperative assessment from preoperative clinic which includes standard general internal medicine and anesthesia assessment.
|
|
|
Experimental: PATH geriatric care
Pre-operative assessment through the PATH clinic
|
Geriatric assessment through PATH clinic which includes an evaluation of comorbidities, health trajectory and baseline frailty as well as conducting an in-depth discussion with the patient on how frailty stage impacts decision-making about surgery in order to co-develop a care plan.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time spent at home 6 months following cancer surgery.
Time Frame: At 6 months postoperatively
|
Number of days spent at home vs in a hospital or care-facility unit dichotomized as low vs high time at home.
High time at home defined as 14 or fewer institution days, and low time defined as more than 14 institution days at 6 months.
|
At 6 months postoperatively
|
|
Preoperative factors associated with decreased proportion of time spent at home at 6 months.
Time Frame: At 6 months postoperatively
|
At 6 months postoperatively
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of participants requiring home care utilization
Time Frame: Assessed from date of hospital discharge (from index surgery) to 6 months postoperatively.
|
Receipt of any homeware service (nursing, wound care, social workers, physiotherapy) from the day of postoperative discharge from the hospital.
|
Assessed from date of hospital discharge (from index surgery) to 6 months postoperatively.
|
|
Number of participants experiencing death or development of persistent significant new disability.
Time Frame: Assessed from date of index surgery to 6 months postoperatively.
|
Participant passing away or developing a new disability, from the day of index surgery.
Assessed using the WHODAS 2.0 disability scale.
|
Assessed from date of index surgery to 6 months postoperatively.
|
|
Preoperative factors associated with increased home care utilization, death, or new onset disability.
Time Frame: Assessed up to 6 months postoperatively.
|
Assessed up to 6 months postoperatively.
|
|
|
Rate of change to a non-operative strategy
Time Frame: Assessed from date of randomization until documented confirmation that patient has opted for non surgical approach, assessed up to 6 months.
|
Rate of patients randomized to PATH clinic arm that end up declining surgery after consultation.
|
Assessed from date of randomization until documented confirmation that patient has opted for non surgical approach, assessed up to 6 months.
|
|
Decision regret scores.
Time Frame: Assessed from date of hospital discharge (from index surgery) to 6 months postoperatively.
|
Decisional Regret Scale ranging from 0-100 scores measure the distress or remorse regarding the patient's decision made about undergoing surgery.
|
Assessed from date of hospital discharge (from index surgery) to 6 months postoperatively.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Richard Spence, MD, FRCSC, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Hall DE, Arya S, Schmid KK, Carlson MA, Lavedan P, Bailey TL, Purviance G, Bockman T, Lynch TG, Johanning JM. Association of a Frailty Screening Initiative With Postoperative Survival at 30, 180, and 365 Days. JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):233-240. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4219.
- McIsaac DI, Taljaard M, Bryson GL, Beaule PE, Gagne S, Hamilton G, Hladkowicz E, Huang A, Joanisse JA, Lavallee LT, MacDonald D, Moloo H, Thavorn K, van Walraven C, Yang H, Forster AJ. Frailty as a Predictor of Death or New Disability After Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study. Ann Surg. 2020 Feb;271(2):283-289. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002967.
- Chesney TR, Coburn N, Mahar AL, Davis LE, Zuk V, Zhao H, Hsu AT, Wright F, Haas B, Hallet J; Recovery After Surgical Therapy for Older Adults Research-Cancer (RESTORE-Cancer) Group. All-Cause and Cancer-Specific Death of Older Adults Following Surgery for Cancer. JAMA Surg. 2021 Jul 1;156(7):e211425. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.1425. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
- Finlayson EV, Birkmeyer JD. Operative mortality with elective surgery in older adults. Eff Clin Pract. 2001 Jul-Aug;4(4):172-7. Erratum In: Eff Clin Pract 2001 Sep-Oct;4(5):235.
- Zhang XM, Jiao J, Xie XH, Wu XJ. The Association Between Frailty and Delirium Among Hospitalized Patients: An Updated Meta-Analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Mar;22(3):527-534. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.01.065. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
- Spence RT, Hirpara DH, Doshi S, Quereshy FA, Chadi SA. ASO Author Reflections: A Reductionist's Approach to Risk-Adjusted Predictions and Outcomes Assessment: Less is More. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 May;28(5):2788-2789. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09284-x. Epub 2020 Nov 5. No abstract available.
- Spence RT, Hirpara DH, Doshi S, Quereshy FA, Chadi SA. Will My Patient Survive an Anastomotic Leak? Predicting Failure to Rescue Using the Modified Frailty Index. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 May;28(5):2779-2787. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09221-y. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
- Theou O, Perez-Zepeda MU, van der Valk AM, Searle SD, Howlett SE, Rockwood K. A classification tree to assist with routine scoring of the Clinical Frailty Scale. Age Ageing. 2021 Jun 28;50(4):1406-1411. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afab006.
- Chesney TR, Haas B, Coburn N, Mahar AL, Davis LE, Zuk V, Zhao H, Wright F, Hsu AT, Hallet J. Association of frailty with long-term homecare utilization in older adults following cancer surgery: Retrospective population-based cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr;47(4):888-895. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.09.009. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
- Moorhouse P, Mallery LH. Palliative and therapeutic harmonization: a model for appropriate decision-making in frail older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Dec;60(12):2326-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04210.x. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
- Chesney TR, Haas B, Coburn NG, Mahar AL, Zuk V, Zhao H, Wright FC, Hsu AT, Hallet J; Recovery After Surgical Therapy for Older Adults Research-Cancer (RESTORE-Cancer) Group. Patient-Centered Time-at-Home Outcomes in Older Adults After Surgical Cancer Treatment. JAMA Surg. 2020 Nov 1;155(11):e203754. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3754. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- PATHTrial
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.