Effect of Different Mobilization Techniques With Common Use of Interferential Therapy in Patients With Knee OA
Effectiveness of Maitland Mobilization Versus Mulligan Mobilization Techniques With Common Use of Interferential Therapy in Patients With Knee Joint Osteoarthritis
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 11433
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of applied Medical Science, King Saud University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Sub-acute or chronic osteoarthritis of knee.
- Age between 45-65 years.
- Gender Male and female.
- Subjects willing to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of R.A, polyarthritis or systemic inflammatory arthropathies.
- History of total knee arthroplasty or major knee trauma injury.
- Fracture of lower limb within the past 6 months.
- Hip or ankle instability, excessive weakness, surgery or major trauma injury.
- Intra-articular steroid injection in knee joint within 3 months.
- Cognitive problems.
- Patient with severe cardiac or pulmonary disorders.
- Peripheral vascular disease.
- Tumour/malignancies/infections.
- Metallic implants in the lower limbs.
- Any severe deformity around the knee joint.
- Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) system47: up to grade 0-III.
- History of neurological and psychological disorders.
- High risk health status- e.g.- uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, angina type pain, nocturnal dyspnoea, shortness of breathing, tachycardia etc.
- Contraindications of IFT and mobilization.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Maitland Group
Maitland Group received Maitland's mobilization techninque in addition to an intereferential therapy.
|
Maitland's mobilization technique was performed on the patients with its all components, such as 1.
Distraction 2. Anteroposterior glides 3. Posteroanterior glides 4. Medial glides and 5. Lateral glides.
Interferential Therapy was performed on the patients with the following parameters: career frequency 4000Hz; waveform: rectangular; sweep time: 1 second rise and fall and 5 second stay; Treatment duration: 10 minutes; sweep frequency: 10 to 130 Hz.
The current intensity was adjusted until the subject reported feeling a strong tingling sensation without causing muscle contraction.
A aquatic gel was applied before straping the electopads over treatment area for smooth electrical conduction.
|
|
Active Comparator: Mulligan Group
Mulligan Group received Mulligan's mobilization techninque in addition to an intereferential therapy.
|
Interferential Therapy was performed on the patients with the following parameters: career frequency 4000Hz; waveform: rectangular; sweep time: 1 second rise and fall and 5 second stay; Treatment duration: 10 minutes; sweep frequency: 10 to 130 Hz.
The current intensity was adjusted until the subject reported feeling a strong tingling sensation without causing muscle contraction.
A aquatic gel was applied before straping the electopads over treatment area for smooth electrical conduction.
Mulligan's mobilization technique was performed on the patients with its all components using a therapeutic belt, such as 1.
Medial mobilization with movement (MWM) for Knee flexion 2. Medial mobilization with movement (MWM) for Knee extension 3. Lateral mobilization with movement (MWM) for Knee flexion 4. Lateral mobilization with movement (MWM) for Knee extension.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Functional limitations
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Functional limitations was assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) index.
It includes five questions about pain, two about stiffness, and 17 on degree of disability of activities of daily living.
The test questions are scored on a scale of 0-4, which correspond to: None (0), Mild (1), Moderate (2), Severe (3), and Extreme (4).
The scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-20 for Pain, 0-8 for Stiffness, and 0-68 for Physical Function.
|
4 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: AMIR IQBAL, MPT, King Saud University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- BIMLS/67/2017
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.