Atropine vs Isoprenaline in the Invasive Diagnosis of Arrhythmias

October 9, 2023 updated by: Medical University of Lodz

Comparison of the Clinical Utility of Atropine and Isoprenaline in the Invasive Diagnosis of Arrhythmias

During electrophysiological study (EPS) multiple drugs are used to reveal arrhythmias and/or conductive system disorders. Two most often used agents are atropine and isoprenaline. Due to their distinct pharmacological properties, they are affecting myocardium in different manner. Those dissimilarities can affect the EPS course and long-term prognosis. The aim of presented study is to evaluate the optimal protocol of pharmacotherapy during EPS.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Electrophysiological study (EPS) is essential tool for heart rhythm disorders diagnostic. Inducibility of arrhythmia before ablation to confirm the diagnosis and inability to do so after the procedure is crucial for long-term success. Multiple drugs are used to reveal arrhythmias and/or conductive system disorders. Two most often used are atropine and isoprenaline. Atropine is a natural, selective antagonist of cholinergic receptors M1 and M2. It reverses the inhibitory effect of vagal nerve on myocardium. This improves sinus node automatism and conduction in atrioventricular node. Isoprenaline is a preferential agonist of beta-1-adrenergic receptors. It has bathmotropic and chronotropic effect. During daily clinical practice those two drugs are often used interchangeably. However, differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics may affect the results. There are lack of data directly comparing those two agents. There are isolated evidences that arrhythmia inducibility rate after the ablation differs between those two drugs. This may lead to the misconception of ablation as successful. The aim of presented study is to evaluate the optimal protocol of pharmacotherapy during EPS.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Poland
      • Lodz, Poland, 93-216
        • Department of Electrocardiology Medical University of Lodz

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with indication for electrophysiological study according to present guidelines of European Society of Cardiology

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not willing or incapable to give written informed consent.
  • Previous diagnosed ventricle tachycardia or fibrillation
  • Previous diagnosed atrial fibrillation or flutter
  • Glaucoma (contraindication for atropine)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Atropine
Patients in whom during electrophysiological study atropine will be used. I.v. bolus of 0.01 mg/kg b.w. will be administered to reach the increase of heart rate of 25% or up to 130/min. If necessary, dose will be increased every 5 minutes until mention above parameters are achieved. Maximum dose will be 0.4 mg/kg b.w.
Drug: Comparison of atropine and isoprenaline
Comparison of heart conductive system and arrhythmia inducibility after using atropine or isoprenaline
Active Comparator: Isoprenaline
Patients in whom during electrophysiological study isoprenaline will be used. Continuous i.v. infusion of 0.01 mcg/kg b.w./min will be administered to reach the increase of heart rate of 25% or up to 130/min. If necessary, dose will be doubled every 5 minutes until mention above parameters are achieved. Maximum dose will be 20 mcg/min.
Drug: Comparison of atropine and isoprenaline
Comparison of heart conductive system and arrhythmia inducibility after using atropine or isoprenaline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of sino-atrial conduction time
Time Frame: During the procedure
Sino-atrial conduction time (ms) during programed atrial stimulation will be assessed to examine the function of sinus node.
During the procedure
Evaluation of sinus node recovery time
Time Frame: During the procedure
Sinus node recovery time (ms) during programed atrial stimulation will be assessed to examine the function of sinus node.
During the procedure
Evaluation of anterograde atrioventricular conduction
Time Frame: During the procedure
Anterograde Wenkebach point (ms) and effective refractory period of atrioventricular node (ms) during programed atrial stimulation will be assessed.
During the procedure
Evaluation of retrograde atrioventricular conduction
Time Frame: During the procedure
Retrograde Wenkebach point (ms) and effective refractory period of atrioventricular node (ms) during programed ventricular stimulation will be assessed.
During the procedure
Arrhythmia inducibility
Time Frame: During the procedure
Inducibility of anticipated arrythmia before and after drug administration and after eventual ablation.
During the procedure
Long-term success rate
Time Frame: 12 months
Recurrence of clinical arrhythmia during 12 months of observation
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of adverse events during the electrophysiological study.
Time Frame: During the procedure
Analysis of adverse events during the electrophysiological study according to used drug. Adverse events includes: death, stroke, cardiogenic shock, anaphylaxis, myocardial infarction, electric storm.
During the procedure
Incidence of adverse events during the 12-month follow up.
Time Frame: 12 months
Analysis of adverse events during the 12-month follow up according to used drug. Adverse events includes: death, stroke, cardiogenic shock, anaphylaxis, myocardial infarction, electric storm.
12 months
Length of the procedure
Time Frame: During the procedure
Analysis of the whole procedure time according to used drug.
During the procedure
Procedure time form drug administration till the end.
Time Frame: During the procedure
Analysis of the procedure time form atropine/isoprenaline administration till the end.
During the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Medical University of Lodz

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 9, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 12, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 9, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RNN/327/20/KE

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings