VACS Device Clinical Study for Incontinence Treatment (VACS-D)

December 7, 2023 updated by: Soranus ArGe ve Danismanlik Hizmetleri Sanayi Ticaret A.S.

Clinical Evaluation of Vaginal Suture Knotting Device in the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence in Women

Stress Urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common health condition in the female population. Mid-urethral slings (MUS) have proven to be effective in the treatment of female SUI. Trans-obturator tape (TOT) has been demonstrated to be as effective as retropubic tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) with fewer major complications. In this study, it is aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a newly developed, innovative medical device, as compared to TOT, in the patients diagnosed with urinary incontinence and requiring the surgical intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The study is an open-label, prospective, parallel-group, randomized, controlled medical device clinical trial, conducted in two centers. The two arms of the trial consist of patients randomized to the new device group and to the TOT group. According to this distribution, one group will be subjected to the operation with the new device, and the other group will be subjected to the operation with a commercially available TOT. Primary objective: Evaluation of the effectiveness of using the new device in the surgical treatment of urinary incontinence. Secondary objectives: Evaluation of the effects of the new device use on patients' quality of life, treatment satisfaction, and sexual functions, as well as assessment of safety. The study includes evaluation of the progress employing objective (pad weight, number of incontinence episodes, urodynamic tests) and subjective tests (questionnaires, diaries) during the 12 months follow-up period.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
67

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
      • İstanbul, Turkey, 34093
        • Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Surgical Medical Sciences, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine
      • İzmir, Turkey, 35100
        • Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Those who have not received radiotherapy
  • Women aged 40-65 years
  • Accompanying infection according to urine culture results people who do not
  • Informed about the study and participated in the study patients who have agreed to participate
  • Acceptable contraception during work agree to continue to apply their methods those who
  • According to the urodynamic test results, the researcher appropriate to be included in the study by patients with
  • After physical and neurological examination inclusion in the study was made by the researcher. eligible patients
  • Previous response to standard treatments (medication, etc.) non-responders (non-responders to methods such as pelvic floor muscle exercises (with or without physical therapy), behavioral and lifestyle modifications, continence-assisted pessaries, and pharmacotherapy)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who are pregnant, supported by biochemical laboratory findings
  • Those in the urinary incontinence category other than SUI
  • Those with significant pelvic organ prolapse (e.g., cystocele, rectocele); (as defined by the International Continence Society greater than phase II)
  • Those with neurological disorders (e.g., multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease)
  • Patients with morbid obesity (BMI greater than 40 Those who are)
  • Those with abnormal bladder capacity (more than 300 cc large)
  • Those with abnormal post-void residuals (50 greater than cc)
  • Urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture Those who are
  • Spastic bladder
  • Those with urinary tract infection (UTI)
  • Those with vesicoureteral reflux
  • Those with bladder stones
  • Those with bladder tumors
  • Difficulty understanding and adapting to work is mentally healthy to the extent that it can create patients without
  • Fulfill the requirements of the work plan who may have trouble adapting to bring patients
  • Negative, as determined by the researcher benefit/risk ratio
  • Any research in the previous 30 days treatment (medication or device) has been received.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: VACS-Minifiks (VACS-D)
During the surgical procedure, this group operated with VACS-Minifiks.
Device: VACS-D
The VACS-Minifiks procedure is a vaginal application of a natural tissue repair procedure whose efficacy has been proven in the abdominal route. The second difference is that the procedure is performed through a single incision instead of the three incisions used in the Transobturator Tape-TOT operation. Thus, the same goal will be achieved in a less invasive way without placing an artificial permanent implant. There is no difference in parameters such as anesthesia, operation time, and discharge time.
Active Comparator: Transobturator Tape (TOT)
During the surgical procedure, this group operated with the commercially available Transobturator Tape (TOT).
Device: TOT
In the Transobturator Tape-TOT operation, the anterior vaginal wall is incised 2 cm sagittal 1.5 cm below the urethra in the dorsal lithotomy position and the paraurethral areas are separated by sharp and blunt dissection and the ischiopubic bone is reached with the finger. The skin is incised so as to remain 1 cm lateral to the ischiopubic ramus on the line passing through the clitoris, and the synthetic tape is placed from outside to inside with special inclined trocars, passing under the urethra close to the medial part of the obturator foramen. Cystoscopy is not performed during the procedure. The vagen mucosa is sutured and the procedure is terminated by inserting a urethral foley catheter. The urethral catheter is removed on postoperative day 1 after the investigator evaluates the patient.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
One-Hour Pad Testing
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
This test is performed in a clinical setting. They include a filling phase, during which the patient spends 15 minutes drinking 500 ml of fluid. This is followed by a series of provocative maneuvers, such as coughing and jumping, to try to stimulate urinary leakage. Pads are weighed before and at the end of the test. Pad loss ≥ 2 g is designated as significant or a 'positive pad test.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Twenty-Four-Hour Pad Testing
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
This test is performed at home. Women are provided with a set of pads and advised not to modify their normal drinking or activities. The aim of such tests is to document leakage in a normal home environment. Pad loss greater than 4 g is designated as significant or a 'positive pad test'.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Number of Total Daily Incontinence Episodes
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
It was obtained using a three-day bladder diary. Objective. Meaningful for patients. Correlates with patients' daily activities. It may not be directly related to the severity of urine leakage. Subject to variability. Requires patient compliance. Day and night urine leakages were recorded separately by the patient for three days. The mean total score for a day was calculated.
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Evaluation of Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 months
The Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (I-QOL), consisting of 22 questions, was used to analyze the improvement in quality of life. It is a validated questionnaire. Higher scores indicate a better level of quality of life compared to lower scores.
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 months
Urodynamic Assessment
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months
The bladder is filled using the catheter and pressure measurements are continuously recorded and patient feedback regarding bladder sensation and urgency. Testing for stress incontinence is performed with coughing and straining. Leak Point Pressure and leakage episodes are recorded and analyzed to provide information regarding the type and severity of incontinence. At the end of the test, urine is passed to assess bladder function further and look for blockage of urinary flow.
Baseline, 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptomatic Assessment for Overactivitive Bladder
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months
Overactive Bladder Assessment Form (OAB-V8), was used for symptomatic evaluation and to assess the impact of symptoms on quality of life. A higher score means a worse outcome. Meaningful for patients. It is standardized. The patient's daily activities are taken into account.
Baseline, 12 months
Assess the Impact of the Dysfunction on Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months
Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6), was used for symptomatic evaluation and to assess the impact of symptoms on quality of life. A lesser score means a better outcome. Meaningful for patients. It is standardized. The patient's daily activities are taken into account.
Baseline, 12 months
Symptomatic Impact Assessment
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months
Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7), was used for symptomatic evaluation and to assess the impact of symptoms on quality of life. A lesser score means a better outcome. Meaningful for patients. It is standardized. The patient's daily activities are taken into account. OAB-V8, UDI-6, and IIQ-7 are validated questionnaires and subjective. It was not correlated with the severity of urine leakage.
Baseline, 12 months
Assessment of Sexual Function
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months
It was used for impact on sexual function using the Female Sexual Function Inventory (FSFI), a validated, gender-specific measure of sexual function.
Baseline, 12 months
Assessment of Sexual Function during Intercourse
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months
Coital Incontinence Questionnaire (CIQ) is a validated, gender-specific measure of sexual function. It was used for the impact on sexual function during Intercourse.
Baseline, 12 months
Post-Voiding Residual (PVR) Urine Volume
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months
Volume: Since the device has the potential to affect bladder emptying, measurement of PVR and clinical significance are important. PVR volume will be measured with a catheter as per standardization and an abnormal value above 100 ml will be accepted.
Baseline, 12 months
Assessment of Serious Adverse Events and Adverse Events
Time Frame: Intraoperative, postoperative 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Patients will be evaluated for adverse events intraoperatively and at visits.
Intraoperative, postoperative 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Soranus ArGe ve Danismanlik Hizmetleri Sanayi Ticaret A.S.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Cagdas Sahin, Assoc. Prof., Ege University Faculty of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Principal Investigator: Cenk Yasa, Professor, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Study Director: Ozgur Yeniel, Professor, Ege University Faculty of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 7, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 5, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 6, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 28, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 7, 2023

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 15, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 7, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • VACS-D 001

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings