Beneficial Effects of Natural Products on Management of Xerostomia

May 7, 2024 updated by: British University In Egypt

Beneficial Effects of Specific Natural Products on Management of Xerostomia: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Xerostomia, the subjective feeling of oral dryness, is a symptom most frequently accompanied by either decreased salivary flow or an altered composition of saliva. Hyposalivation, on the other hand, is the objective measured reduction in salivary flow rate. Xerostomia is a relatively common complaint, particularly among older people, and can lead to major consequences with regard to the quality of their general and oral health and wellbeing.

Xerostomia has a variety of possible etiological factors; it is generally classified as having primary and secondary causes. Primary causes comprise conditions that directly affect the salivary glands and induce xerostomia like, Sjogren's syndrome, diabetes mellitus type 1 and 2, thyroid disease, adrenal pathology, renal or hepatic diseases, hepatitis C virus infection, and HIV disease.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Multiple pharmacological and non-pharmacological measures that have been tested in previous studies in order to improve xerostomia in patients suffering from that complaint which were based on the stimulation of the salivary gland flow. Salivary glands can be stimulated to produce saliva mechanically (for example, by chewing gum, using different formulated mouthwashes or acupressure) or through medications (such as pilocarpine, cevimeline, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor antagonists) Overall, the available interventions do not appear to provide an effective, comprehensive and long-term management of xerostomia. This has strengthened the need for further investigation of other interventions for the management of xerostomia As Egypt is considered a low-income country, therefore, the general properties of ideal saliva substitutes to be used should be inexpensive, edible, hydrating, safe-to-swallow but retainable in the mouth.

Given the importance of the oral health status of in patients suffering from dry mouth with the associated problems, and the limited availability of proper remedy for xerostomia in the Egyptian market. This study is designed to evaluate the efficiency of different and natural treatment as a mix of (Manuka honey -green tea) mouth rinse in management of xerostomia.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
28

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Cairo, Egypt, 3753450
        • The british university in egypt

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • - Both genders, aged above 19 years.
  • All patients must have complaint of xerostomia.
  • Objective dry mouth score from (2-5).
  • Subjective dry mouth score from (1-4).
  • Patients must be able to make reliable decision or communications.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Smoking, Alcohol.
  • Patient with history of any serious illness as malignancy.
  • Patients with any autoimmune disease.
  • Vulnerable groups such as pregnant females, prisoners, mentally and physically handicapped individuals.
  • Known hypersensitivity or severe adverse effects to the treatment drugs or to any ingredient of their preparation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Saline mouthwash control group
Patients in the control arm followed the same protocol with normal saline rinses in the same bottles 3 times per day for xerostomia
Other: (Manuka honey-green tea)

Manuka honey is a natural honey, and green tea are herbs Dried green tea leaves (100 gm) will be soaked into 500 ml of methanol solution for two days. Green tea plus ginger mouthwash was prepared by adding 50% green tea extract and 50% ginger extract. After extraction, the extract was filtered and taker to the vacuum evaporator to remove the solvent.

The mouthwash was prepared by adding 3 gm of each extract, 0.12 gm sodium saccharin, and one liter distilled water, then every 20 ml of Manuka honey were added in 100 ml of (green tea and ginger solution). Finally, the mixture was stirred vigorously until all the particles were dissolved. Thereafter the obtained mixture was filtered. The mouthwash then filled in sterilized amber color bottles of 250 ml each.

According to similar studies performed in this field, the patients used a 20ml of (Manuka honey-green tea- ginger) mouthwash three times a day (preferably after their meals), kept it for one minute, and then poured it out
Active Comparator: (Manuka honey-green tea) interventional arm
• (Manuka honey-green tea) will topically be applied to the oral mucosa as oral rinse 3 times per day to treat xerostomia.
Other: (Manuka honey-green tea)

Manuka honey is a natural honey, and green tea are herbs Dried green tea leaves (100 gm) will be soaked into 500 ml of methanol solution for two days. Green tea plus ginger mouthwash was prepared by adding 50% green tea extract and 50% ginger extract. After extraction, the extract was filtered and taker to the vacuum evaporator to remove the solvent.

The mouthwash was prepared by adding 3 gm of each extract, 0.12 gm sodium saccharin, and one liter distilled water, then every 20 ml of Manuka honey were added in 100 ml of (green tea and ginger solution). Finally, the mixture was stirred vigorously until all the particles were dissolved. Thereafter the obtained mixture was filtered. The mouthwash then filled in sterilized amber color bottles of 250 ml each.

According to similar studies performed in this field, the patients used a 20ml of (Manuka honey-green tea- ginger) mouthwash three times a day (preferably after their meals), kept it for one minute, and then poured it out

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in subjective dry mouth score
Time Frame: one month
subjective dry mouth scores were calculated as the number of asked questions about dry mouth symptoms (0-4), and patients with a score higher than 1 considered having xerostomia so higher scores more than 1 out of 4 indicating xerostomia but lower scores suggesting improvement.
one month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in objective dry mouth score
Time Frame: one month
Objective dry mouth scores were calculated as the number of observed dry mouth signs (0-5), and patients with a score higher than 2 having xerostomia so higher scores more than 2 out of 5 indicating xerostomia but lower scores suggesting improvement
one month
Salivary flow rates
Time Frame: one month

Eating and talking were prohibited during the time of collection. Unstimulated whole saliva was collected for 5 min by spitting method. The collection will be timed, so that flow rate (mL/min) could be measure.

increasing in the salivary flow rate of the unstimulated saliva is considered improvment
one month
Salivary Nitric oxide levels
Time Frame: one month
Increasing in the salivary nitric oxide levels indicating improvment
one month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
British University In Egypt

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 7, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 22-018

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on (Manuka honey-green tea)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings