Vericiguat in Patients With Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction Causing Stable Chest Pain (V-COM)

June 25, 2026 updated by: The University of Hong Kong

Randomised Controlled Trial of Vericiguat in Patients With Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction Causing Stable Chest Pain (V-COM)

This is a randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of Vericiguat to improve stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial perfusion reserve as measured by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Stable chest pain is one of the most common complaints by patients. However, about 50% of patients referred for catheter coronary angiograms do not have obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). In the United Kingdom (UK), one very large population study showed that ~70% of patients did not have a cause for the chest pain diagnosed within 6 months of presentation. Furthermore, the study further showed that this group of patients had a significantly higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) compared to patients without chest pain. It is now understood that the two major causes of cardiac chest pain with non obstructive CAD (also known as Ischaemia with Non Obstructive Coronary Arteries (INOCA)) are coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and the other is coronary vasospasm. CMD and coronary vasospasm have been shown in one randomised controlled study to comprise 52% and 17% of all patients with INOCA. However, therapies for CMD are lacking and has been highlighted as a major area of need.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
94

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Hong Kong
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • The University of Hong Kong
        • Contact:
          • Ming Yen Ng, BMBS
          • Phone Number: (852)22554524
          • Email: myng2@hku.hk

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Stable recurrent chest pain.
  2. 40 to 75 years old.
  3. Have coronary computed tomography (CT) angiogram or catheter coronary angiogram within 6 months showing non-obstructive coronary artery disease (<50% coronary artery stenosis or fractional flow reserve >0.8).
  4. Stress CMR MPR <2.19 12 or Stress MBF <2.19ml/g/min 13.
  5. Female participant is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, is not a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP),or is a WOCBP and agrees to follow contraceptive guidance during the study intervention period and for at least 1 month after the last dose of study intervention.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg.
  2. Concurrent use of soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators (eg. Riociguat), or phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (eg. vardenafil, tadalafil, and sildenafil).
  3. Has known allergy or sensitivity to any soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator.
  4. On long-acting nitrates (eg. isosorbide mononitrate)
  5. Known cardiomyopathy, complex congenital heart disease, endocarditis or pericarditis.
  6. Has acute coronary syndrome (unstable angina, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), or ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)) or coronary revascularization (coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)) within 60 days prior to randomisation, or indication for coronary revascularization at time of randomisation.
  7. Has symptomatic carotid stenosis, transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke within 60 days prior to randomisation.
  8. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73m2
  9. Malignancy or other non-cardiac condition limiting life expectancy to <3 years.
  10. Patient's with implanted devices which are not MRI compatible.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Control group
Patients will have no intervention and will continue to have optimised medical therapy and follow-up appointments (currently 1 appointment every 3 months).
Diagnostic test: Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
All patients will have stress CMR examinations at recruitment and at the end of trial.
Other Names:
  • Stress CMR
Experimental: Intervention group
Patients will be prescribed vericiguat once a day for 6 months, starting at 2.5mg and titrated up to the full dose of 10mg per day (doubling of dose every 2 weeks) in addition to optimised medical therapy and standard follow-up like the control group
Diagnostic test: Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
All patients will have stress CMR examinations at recruitment and at the end of trial.
Other Names:
  • Stress CMR
Drug: Vericiguat
Patients will be prescribed vericiguat once a day for 6 months, starting at 2.5mg and titrated up to the full dose of 10mg per day (doubling of dose every 2 weeks) in addition to optimised medical therapy and standard follow-up like the control group
Other Names:
  • Verquvo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in stress myocardial blood flow (MBF)
Time Frame: 36 months
Difference in stress MBF as measured by stress CMR between patients receiving Vericiguat and patients not receiving Vericiguat
36 months
Difference in stress myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR)
Time Frame: 36 months
Difference in stress MPR as measured by stress CMR between patients receiving Vericiguat and patients not receiving Vericiguat
36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in exercise tolerance through performing a cardiopulmonary exercise test.
Time Frame: 36 months
Measured by baseline and end of study 6-minute walk test
36 months
Progression in patient symptoms diagnoses.
Time Frame: 36 months
The Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7) scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. The measurement will take place at time of baseline CMR and at follow-up CMR in order to determine if there is an improvement in patient symptoms.
36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 25, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 2, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 29, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 25, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • UW 23-605

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings