Feasibility of Kanasina Gulabi, a Pilot Peer Support Intervention for Young Adults With Type 2 Diabetes in Mysore District, South India
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Karnataka
-
Mysore, Karnataka, India
- Public Health Research Institute of India
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- aged 18 - 40 years old
- self-reported to have type 2 diabetes
- living in Mysore district
- able to speak English or Kannada
- and able to access a cellular phone during the study period
Exclusion Criteria:
- pregnant
- living with a serious medical or psychological disorder that would impede study procedure
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention
|
Kanasina Gulabi is a theory-driven, educational-behavioral intervention designed to improve the quality of life and diabetes management among young adults living with type 2 diabetes in Mysore district, South India.
In this intervention, young adults with type 2 diabetes were matched to non-specialist peer navigators -- trained young adult peers who were also managing type 2 diabetes -- and developed action plans to improve their physical and mental health outcomes.
Intervention components included group education, mindfulness activities, self care activity tracking, and phone follow-ups to address knowledge gaps and misinformation about type 2 diabetes, build self-efficacy for type 2 diabetes-related self care activities, and provide emotional support for diabetes management.
|
|
No Intervention: Control
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Reach
Time Frame: Week 0 - 5, Week 12
|
The absolute number, proportion, and representativeness of individuals who are willing to participate in the quasi-experimental study for Kanasina Gulabi.
|
Week 0 - 5, Week 12
|
|
Glycemic Control
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 12
|
Percentage of measured hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) that represents average blood sugar levels over the past 3 months, used to measure diabetes management and glycemic control.
|
Week 0, Week 12
|
|
Diabetes Knowledge
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 5, Week 12
|
Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire (DKQ-24).
24 self-report items to assess overall diabetes knowledge.
Responses are measured as true, false, or don't know.
One composite score is calculated (range: 0 - 24); higher scores reflect better diabetes knowledge.
|
Week 0, Week 5, Week 12
|
|
Diabetes Distress
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 5, Week 12
|
Type 2 Diabetes Distress Assessment System (T2-DDAS).
8 self-report items to assess diabetes-related emotional distress in adults with type 2 diabetes.
Responses are endorsed on a 5-point scale and refer to the past month.
One composite mean score is calculated (range: 0 - 5); higher scores reflect more diabetes distress.
|
Week 0, Week 5, Week 12
|
|
Diabetes-Related Stigma
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 5, Week 12
|
Type 2 Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale (DSAS-2).
19 self-report items to assess perceived and experienced stigma for adults with type 2 diabetes.
Responses are endorsed on a 5-point scale and refer to the past two weeks.
One composite score is calculated (range: 19 - 95); higher scores reflect more experiences of stigma.
|
Week 0, Week 5, Week 12
|
|
Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 5, Week 12
|
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).
9 self-report items to screen for depression and assess degree of severity.
Responses are endorsed on a 4-point scale and refer to the past two weeks.
One composite score is calculated (range: 0 - 27); higher scores reflect more depressive symptoms.
|
Week 0, Week 5, Week 12
|
|
Optimism
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 5, Week 12
|
Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R).
10 self-report items to measure positive and negative expectations strongly linked to the future.
Responses are endorsed on a 5-point scale.
One composite score is calculated (range: 0 - 24); higher scores reflect higher dispositional optimism.
|
Week 0, Week 5, Week 12
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Eve S Puffer, PhD, Duke University
- Principal Investigator: Sumedha Ariely, PhD, Duke University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2023-0247
- 2023-03-11-77 (Other Identifier: Public Health Research Institute of India)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.