Psychological Factors Influencing Cancer Post-traumatic Growth (CEMA-P)

March 19, 2025 updated by: Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes

Study of the Psychological Factors Influencing Post-traumatic Growth During Oncological Pathway

The study focuses on post-traumatic growth (positive changes linked to appreciation of life, personal strengths, social relationships...) in the context of different types of cancer and with a longitudinal approach to the care pathway. The aim of the study is to better understand whether psychological variables (emotional competence, psychological flexibility, psychological distress) and patients' care satisfaction, assessed at the start of the cancer treatment pathway, can influence their post-traumatic growth at the end of the chemotherapy protocol and 6 months later.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
289

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Valenciennes, France, 59300
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Anne Sophie Baudry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients over 18 years of age
  • Patients in the initial phase of curative treatment for a 1st solid cancer
  • At the start of neo-adjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy (1st course or 2nd course)
  • At less than 6 months from the initial diagnosis
  • Patient having given written consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a previous history of cancer
  • Patients with incurable cancer progression, recurrence or relapse
  • Metastatic, brain, hematological or skin cancer
  • Patients who have difficulty understanding written French
  • Patient psychologically or physically unable to answer questionnaires

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Interviews with a psychologist/psychiatrist
Implementation of an interview with a psychologist or psychiatrist following a telephone conversation with patients with no psychological follow-up and a high HADS score (≥11), at all stages of the study (start of chemotherapy T1, end of chemotherapy T2, 6 months after the end of chemotherapy).
Other: Interviews with a psychologist/psychiatrist
All patients with a high score (≥11) on the HADS anxiety and/or depressive symptoms scale and who are not already receiving known psychological treatment or treatment mentioned in the file will be contacted by telephone by the investigator or a qualified person designated by him/her in order to conduct a telephone interview with the patient and refer him/her to a psychologist or psychiatrist if necessary. The number and percentage of consultations with a psychologist or psychiatrist following this telephone interview will be calculated in order to highlight the benefits of such a practice (HADS assessment + telephone interview with +/- referral) for earlier and easier referral. Depending on the number of patients contacted, consideration may be given to testing the effect of this approach on post-traumatic development.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-traumatic growth
Time Frame: T1 : At the beginning of chemotherapy
Post-traumatic growth will be assessed using a 21-item self-report questionnaire and a Likert scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Totally), the Posttraumatic growth inventory (PTGI), which has been revalidated in French (Dubuy et al., 2022) in 4 dimensions: new direction for life (6 items), personal abilities (6 items), spiritual change (2 items) and relationships with others (7 items).
T1 : At the beginning of chemotherapy
Post-traumatic growth
Time Frame: T2 : Up to 3 weeks after the end of chemotherapy
Post-traumatic growth will be assessed using a 21-item self-report questionnaire and a Likert scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Totally), the Posttraumatic growth inventory (PTGI), which has been revalidated in French (Dubuy et al., 2022) in 4 dimensions: new direction for life (6 items), personal abilities (6 items), spiritual change (2 items) and relationships with others (7 items).
T2 : Up to 3 weeks after the end of chemotherapy
Post-traumatic growth
Time Frame: T3 : 6 months after the end of chemotherapy protocol
Post-traumatic growth will be assessed using a 21-item self-report questionnaire and a Likert scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Totally), the Posttraumatic growth inventory (PTGI), which has been revalidated in French (Dubuy et al., 2022) in 4 dimensions: new direction for life (6 items), personal abilities (6 items), spiritual change (2 items) and relationships with others (7 items).
T3 : 6 months after the end of chemotherapy protocol

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Satisfaction of supportive care needs
Time Frame: T1 : At the beginning of chemotherapy
Patients' satisfaction of supportive care needs are assessed using the Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS), validated in French (Brédart et al., 2012), comprising 34 items and 5 dimensions (Physical and daily life, psychological and emotional, sexuality, information, care system).
T1 : At the beginning of chemotherapy
Satisfaction of supportive care needs
Time Frame: T2 : Up to 3 weeks after the end of chemotherapy
Patients' satisfaction of supportive care needs are assessed using the Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS), validated in French (Brédart et al., 2012), comprising 34 items and 5 dimensions (Physical and daily life, psychological and emotional, sexuality, information, care system).
T2 : Up to 3 weeks after the end of chemotherapy
Satisfaction of supportive care needs
Time Frame: T3 : 6 months after the end of chemotherapy protocol
Patients' satisfaction of supportive care needs are assessed using the Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS), validated in French (Brédart et al., 2012), comprising 34 items and 5 dimensions (Physical and daily life, psychological and emotional, sexuality, information, care system).
T3 : 6 months after the end of chemotherapy protocol
Emotional competence
Time Frame: T1 : At the beginning of chemotherapy
Emotional competence are assessed using the Profile of Emotional Competence (S-PEC), validated in French (Baudry et al., 2020), comprising 13 items and 2 dimensions (intrapersonal and interpersonal emotional skills).
T1 : At the beginning of chemotherapy
Emotional competence
Time Frame: T2 : Up to 3 weeks after the end of chemotherapy
Emotional competence are assessed using the Profile of Emotional Competence (S-PEC), validated in French (Baudry et al., 2020), comprising 13 items and 2 dimensions (intrapersonal and interpersonal emotional skills).
T2 : Up to 3 weeks after the end of chemotherapy
Emotional competence
Time Frame: T3 : 6 months after the end of chemotherapy protocol
Emotional competence are assessed using the Profile of Emotional Competence (S-PEC), validated in French (Baudry et al., 2020), comprising 13 items and 2 dimensions (intrapersonal and interpersonal emotional skills).
T3 : 6 months after the end of chemotherapy protocol
Anxiety and depression symptoms
Time Frame: T1 : At the beginning of chemotherapy
Anxiety and depressive symptoms were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), validated in French (Razavi et al., 1989), comprising 14 items and 2 dimensions (anxiety and depression).
T1 : At the beginning of chemotherapy
Anxiety and depression symptoms
Time Frame: T2 : Up to 3 weeks after the end of chemotherapy
Anxiety and depressive symptoms were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), validated in French (Razavi et al., 1989), comprising 14 items and 2 dimensions (anxiety and depression).
T2 : Up to 3 weeks after the end of chemotherapy
Anxiety and depression symptoms
Time Frame: T3 : 6 months after the end of chemotherapy protocol
Anxiety and depressive symptoms were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), validated in French (Razavi et al., 1989), comprising 14 items and 2 dimensions (anxiety and depression).
T3 : 6 months after the end of chemotherapy protocol
Psychological flexibility
Time Frame: T1 : At the beginning of chemotherapy
Psychological flexibility is assessed using the multidimensional psychological flexibility inventory (MPFI-24), validated in French (Grégoire et al., 2020), consisting of 24 items and 2 dimensions (flexibility and inflexibility).
T1 : At the beginning of chemotherapy
Psychological flexibility
Time Frame: T2 : Up to 3 weeks after the end of chemotherapy
Psychological flexibility is assessed using the multidimensional psychological flexibility inventory (MPFI-24), validated in French (Grégoire et al., 2020), consisting of 24 items and 2 dimensions (flexibility and inflexibility).
T2 : Up to 3 weeks after the end of chemotherapy
Psychological flexibility
Time Frame: T3 : 6 months after the end of chemotherapy protocol
Psychological flexibility is assessed using the multidimensional psychological flexibility inventory (MPFI-24), validated in French (Grégoire et al., 2020), consisting of 24 items and 2 dimensions (flexibility and inflexibility).
T3 : 6 months after the end of chemotherapy protocol

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Centre Oscar Lambret
Ligue contre le cancer, France
Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul, Lille
Centre de Cancérologie Les Dentellières
Clinique Teissier

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Anne-Sophie Baudry, CH de Valenciennes

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 10, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 10, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 7, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 19, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2023-02-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings