Effect of Empowerment-Based Interventions on Self-Efficacy and Self-Care Capacity Among Adults With Sickle Cell Disease
This study aimed to To investigate the effect of empowerment-based interventions (EBI) on self-efficacy and self-care capacity among adults with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD).
The hypotheses of this study were: Adults with SCD who receive EBI exhibit higher self-efficacy, self- management capacity and HRQoL than those who do not.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Manama, Bahrain, 11511
- College of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Bahrain
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients with SCD f
- Receiving treatment from primary health care facilities
- Able to read and write
- Having the chance to attend the educational sessions .
Exclusion Criteria:
- A history of mental illness .
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Empowerment-Based Interventions (EBI)
The EBI was used for the study group.
It is an integrative educational program under the patient-centered care approach emphasizing collaborative patient interaction.
The EBI was implemented through structured (a) small-group discussion sessions, (b) individualized consultations, and (c) follow-up sessions.
|
The Empowerment-Based Interventions was used for the study group.
It is an integrative educational program under the patient-centered care approach emphasizing collaborative patient interaction.
The EBI was implemented through structured (a) small-group d
|
|
Active Comparator: standard health education
Patients in the control group received standard health education from SCD clinics in the HC.
The clinic employs a multidisciplinary team, including a nurse, a physician, a health record clerk, a laboratory technician, a social worker, and a health promotion specialist, to provide integrated patient health services.
It consists of both preventative and curative services.
The nurses at the health center provide patients with information regarding factors that may cause vaso-occlusion and precipitate VOCs when to seek emergency care and educate patients on the significance of regular medical examinations and screening using different standardized audiovisual aids.
|
Patients in the control group received standard health education from SCD clinics in the HC.
The clinic employs a multidisciplinary team, including a nurse, a physician, a health record clerk, a laboratory technician, a social worker, and a health promotion specialist, to provide integrated patient health services.
It consists of both preventative and curative services.
The nurses at the health center provide patients with information regarding factors that may cause vaso-occlusion and precipitate VOCs when to seek emergency care and educate patients on the significance of regular medical examinations and screening using different standardized audiovisual aids.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Sickle Cell Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: 1 month
|
This scale was designed by Edwards et al. (2000) to assess the self-appraisals of adult patients with sickle cell disease for their ability to engage in daily functional activities(22).
It is composed of nine items rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from "not at all sure" to "very sure cell disease for their ability to engage in daily functional activities.
It is composed of nine items rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from "not at all sure" to "very sure."
The total score ranged from 9 to 45, with higher scores indicating higher levels of self-efficacy.
|
1 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-Care Capacity
Time Frame: 1 month
|
This scale was originally developed by Kearney and Fleischer (1979) according to Orem's self-care theory and revised by Wang and Laffrey (2000) to assess the level of health-related self-care capacity(24,25).
The scale consists of 15 items, rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "totally disagree" (1 point) to "totally agree" (5 points).
|
1 month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: adnan Bekhit, Professor, College of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Bahrain
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Al Raqaishi H, Al Qadire M, Alzaabi O, Al Omari O. Health-Related Stigma, Social Support, Self-Efficacy, and Self-Care Actions Among Adults With Sickle Cell Disease in Oman. Clin Nurs Res. 2022 Jun;31(5):803-811. doi: 10.1177/10547738211046731. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
- Castro EM, Van Regenmortel T, Vanhaecht K, Sermeus W, Van Hecke A. Patient empowerment, patient participation and patient-centeredness in hospital care: A concept analysis based on a literature review. Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Dec;99(12):1923-1939. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.026. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
- Cheng L, Sit JWH, Choi KC, Chair SY, Li X, Wu Y, Long J, Yang H. The effects of an empowerment-based self-management intervention on empowerment level, psychological distress, and quality of life in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Apr;116:103407. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103407. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
- Crosby LE, Hood A, Kidwell K, Nwankwo C, Peugh J, Strong H, Quinn C, Britto MT. Improving self-management in adolescents with sickle cell disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020 Oct;67(10):e28492. doi: 10.1002/pbc.28492. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 25/2021-22 dt. Dec. 12,2021
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.