Heat Application to the Sacral Region and Pain Level During the First Stage of Labor

February 29, 2024 updated by: Tulay Kavlak, Istanbul Demiroglu Bilim University

The Effect of Heat Application to the Sacral Region During The First Stage of Labor On the Pain Level and the Obstetric Outcomes

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of hot application applied to the sacral region during first stage of labor on women's pain level and labor process.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

It is stated that the pain experienced during labor, which is a physiological process, creates stress and anxiety in women and increases the risk of maternal and neonatal complications. Therefore, keeping labor pain under control is important from an obstetrical perspective. Pain experienced during labor is caused by dilatation of the cervix and uterine contractions, and occurs in different regions at each stage of labor. Due to the descent of the fetal head into the pelvis and the pressure it puts on the lumbosacral plexus, the mother feels pain in her back, waist, legs and hips, especially in the first stage of labor. Although pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods are used in the management of labor pain, they have disadvantages such as experiencing drug-related side effects due to pharmacological methods, causing undesirable effects in the woman and the fetus, the woman not being able to actively participate in the labor and not being able to remember what happened during labor.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
134

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34384
        • Demiroglu Bilim University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women were over 18 years of age
  • Primipara
  • Volunteered to participate in the study
  • Were in the latent phase of labor (cervical dilatation 1-2 cm)
  • Had a single fetus in vertex presentation
  • Had no history of pregnancy complications
  • Had not undergone any intervention in the sacral region were included in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Applied pharmacological pain control methods in the first stage of labor
  • Had a cesarean section decision at any stage

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: heat application
women in the intervention group were treated with hot water application to the sacral region during the first stage of labor. When the cervical dilatation was 3-4 cm, 5-6 cm and 7-8 cm, heat application was applied a total of 3 times.
Other: heat application
• Thermophore Application: Before the application, the thermophore was wrapped in a towel to prevent skin damage. Studies in the literature indicate that the surface temperature of the thermophore should be 38-45 °C. For this reason, water with a temperature of 70°C when measured with a thermometer was added into the thermophore. Similarly, studies in the literature indicate that thermophore application should be applied for 10-30 minutes. Therefore, the application takes 20 minutes. The researcher stayed with the woman for 20 minutes.
No Intervention: no heat application
No treatment was performed on women in the control group during the study. In the clinic, women's cervical dilatation is routinely checked by the midwife every 2-3 hours, and the progress of labor is monitored by fetal heart rate and fetal monitoring

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline labor Pain at three times
Time Frame: The pain was evaluated three times during labor
It will be assessed three times during the first stage of the labor with Number Rating Scale. Pain intensity measured on a Number Rating Scale with scores ranging from 0 - 10. Pain increases as the score increases. The high point describes bad outcome.
The pain was evaluated three times during labor

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of the first stage of labor
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 day
The time between the start of the pain expressed by the woman and the moment she was taken to the delivery table was calculated by the researcher and called the first stage of labor. The researcher used clock to calculate the duration
through study completion, an average of 1 day
Change From Baseline APGAR score after delivery
Time Frame: After delivery in two times at first and fifth minutes through study completion, an average of 1 day
The scale is designed to determine the need for urgent intervention by assessing the condition of the newborn in order to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality rates. A score of 0 represents the lowest level of functionality, while a score of 10 indicates optimal health. A score below 4 indicates that the newborn has significant respiratory distress that requires urgent medical attention
After delivery in two times at first and fifth minutes through study completion, an average of 1 day
Change From Baseline Fetal Heart Rate
Time Frame: A total of three measurement results were obtained (after the cervical dilatation was evaluated as 3-4 cm, 5-6 cm and 7-8 cm)
after the cervical dilatation Fetal Heart Rate was evaluated with monitor. the recommended level is 100 to 160 heart beat/minute
A total of three measurement results were obtained (after the cervical dilatation was evaluated as 3-4 cm, 5-6 cm and 7-8 cm)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Istanbul Demiroglu Bilim University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Tülay KAVLAK, Istanbul Demiroglu Bilim University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 29, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 6, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 29, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2020/20

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings