Multisite rTMS for Mood, Cognitive Impairment and Other Symptoms of Depression

October 9, 2024 updated by: Jakub Antczak

Multisite Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Mood, Cognitive Impairment, Anhedonia and Disordered Sleep in Depressive Disorder

Depressed mood is the main symptom of depression, but other symptoms like cognitive impairment, anhedonia or sleep disorders may also contribute to patients suffering and are difficult to treat. rTMS is a relatively novel treatment option, whose therapeutic potential is still investigated and optimized. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of rTMS applied over two stimulation sites on cognitive impairment, anhedonia and sleep disorders in depression.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Depression is one of the most common and disabling disorders, affecting approximately three hundred million people worldwide. Depressive mood is the main symptom, but other symptoms like cognitive impairment, anhedonia or sleep disorders contribute significantly to patients suffering, decrease quality of life and may even lead to suicide attempt. While modern pharmacotherapy can significantly improve symptoms in many patients, still one third of patients remains drug-resistant. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive method of inducing brain plasticity. Stimulation over the left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and possibly over several other areas can improve mood. Only few studies investigated the effect of rTMS on negative psychiatric symptoms, such as anhedonia, sleeplessness or cognitive impairment. In these trials, either the DLPFC or the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) were stimulated and sometimes other areas such as the insular cortex. The aim of this study is to investigate if a stimulation over both sites (multi-site stimulation) has better therapeutic potential for depressed mood, cognitive impairment, anhedonia and sleep disorders than stimulation over DLPFC alone and placebo.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
90

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Poland
      • Cracovia, Poland, 30393
        • Recruiting
        • The Education of Research and Development Center, Babinski Clinical Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • severe or moderate depressive episode (according to international classification of diseases (ICD)-10) without psychotic symptoms at the time of inclusion
  • Hamilton Depression Rating Scale between between 20 and 35 points at inclusion
  • The score in the Athens Insomnia Scale eight or more
  • The score of three or more points in items 4 and 21 of the Beck Depressions Inventory 2
  • Complaining about problems with memory and concentration timely related with the onset of depression

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to transcranial magnetic stimulation, including ferromagnetic elements in head, pregnancy and epilepsy
  • Psychotic symptoms at the time of inclusion
  • Suicidal ideations and/or attempts within three months prior to inclusion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: rTMS over the left DLPFC and over the left DMPFC
Active 10 Herz rTMS with intensity of 120% of the resting motor threshold recorded from the right first dorsal interosseus and the right abductor hallucis will be administered over the left DLPFC and over the left DMPFC respectively. Therapy will include 20 sessions (one session in each of 20 consecutive working days - four weeks in total). In every session ca 1500 magnetic pulses over the left DLPFC and ca 1500 over the left DMPFC will be elicited.
Device: Active rTMS over the left DLPFC and over the left DMPFC
Active rTMS over the left DLPFC and over the left DMPFC to induce the long term potentiation of stimulated areas.
Active Comparator: rTMS over the left DLPFC
Active 10 Herz rTMS with intensity of 120% of the resting motor threshold recorded from the right first dorsal interosseus will be administered over the left DLPFC. Therapy will include 20 sessions (one session in each of 20 consecutive working days - four weeks in total). In every session 3000 magnetic pulses over the left DLPFC will be elicited.
Device: Active rTMS over the left DLPFC
Active rTMS over the left DLPFC to induce the long term potentiation of stimulated area.
Sham Comparator: Sham rTMS
Sham 10 Herz rTMS will be administered over the left DLPFC. Therapy will include 20 sessions (one session in each of 20 consecutive working days - four weeks in total). In every session 3000 magnetic pulses over the left DLPFC or ca 1500 magnetic pulses over the left DLPFC and ca 1500 over the left DMPFC will be elicited. (rTMS protocol will be chosen randomly before the first session).
Device: Sham rTMS
Sham rTMS over the left DLPFC or over the left DLPFC and over the left DMPFC for placebo.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Beck Depression Inventory 2
Time Frame: Before intervention - four weeks after finishing intervention.
Inventory consisting of 21 items measuring cognitive, affective, somatic, and vegetative symptoms of depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3, with a higher score denoting more severe depression. Items are related to the criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV. The minimum value of the total score is 0 and the maximum is 63 with higher scores meaning worse outcome. Change from the baseline to the measurement done after finishing intervention, to the measurement done two weeks after finishing intervention to the measurement done four weeks after finishing intervention.
Before intervention - four weeks after finishing intervention.
Froward digit span
Time Frame: Before intervention - four weeks after finishing intervention.
A measure of verbal short term and working memory. Participant is asked to repeat the random series of numbers, which become longer along with every correctly repeated one. Test is finished after participant failed to respond correctly on three occasions. The number of correctly repeated series determines the final score, which is an integer representing the length of the largest passed sequence. The scores range from 3 to 9 with higher scores denoting better outcome. Change from the baseline to the measurement done after finishing intervention, to the measurement done two weeks after finishing intervention to the measurement done four weeks after finishing intervention.
Before intervention - four weeks after finishing intervention.
Language part of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination
Time Frame: Before intervention - four weeks after finishing intervention.
A test to identify cognitive impairment in dementia. In the language part, participant is asked to complete a set commands such as "place the paper on top of the pencil"; to write grammatically-complete sentences; to repeat several words and proverbs; to name the objects shown in drawings, and answer questions and to read several mispronounced words. The number of correctly completed tasks is scored. The minimum value of the total score is 0 and the maximum (of the language part) is 26 with higher scores meaning better outcome. Change from the baseline to the measurement done after finishing intervention, to the measurement done two weeks after finishing intervention to the measurement done four weeks after finishing intervention.
Before intervention - four weeks after finishing intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale
Time Frame: Before intervention - four weeks after finishing intervention.
A 17-item scale that measures desire, motivation, effort and consummatory pleasure across hedonic domains. In each item, participant chooses one of four statements describing his attitude towards a given activity. The minimum value of the total score is 0 and the maximum is 68 with higher scores meaning better outcome. Change from the baseline to the measurement done after finishing intervention, to the measurement done two weeks after finishing intervention to the measurement done four weeks after finishing intervention.
Before intervention - four weeks after finishing intervention.
Athens Insomnia Scale
Time Frame: Before intervention - four weeks after finishing intervention.
An eight item scale. Each item is rated from 0 to 3 with higher scores representing more severe insomnia. Change from baseline score in the Athens Insomnia Scale to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS. The minimum value of the total score is 0 and the maximum is 24 with higher scores meaning worse outcome. Change from the baseline to the measurement done after finishing intervention, to the measurement done two weeks after finishing intervention to the measurement done four weeks after finishing intervention.
Before intervention - four weeks after finishing intervention.
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time Frame: Before intervention - four weeks after finishing intervention.
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a questionnaire to identify sleep disturbances. It consists of a combination of Likert-type and open-ended questions, which are later converted to scaled scores. Scores for each question range from 0 to 3. The minimum value of the total score is 0 and the maximum is 21 with higher scores meaning worse outcome. Change from the baseline to the measurement done after finishing intervention, to the measurement done two weeks after finishing intervention to the measurement done four weeks after finishing intervention.
Before intervention - four weeks after finishing intervention.
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Time Frame: Before intervention - four weeks after finishing intervention.
An eight-item scale. Each item refers to a situation such as driving a car or sitting quietly. The subject is asked to assess the chance of dosing in each situation, ranging from 0 (no chance) to 3 (dosing very likely). The minimum value of the total score is 0 and the maximum is 24 with higher scores meaning worse outcome. Change from the baseline to the measurement done after finishing intervention, to the measurement done two weeks after finishing intervention to the measurement done four weeks after finishing intervention.
Before intervention - four weeks after finishing intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Jakub Antczak

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Wojciech Korzeniowski, MD, The Education of Research and Development Center, Babinski Clinical Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 9, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 9, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 12, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 9, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • JagiellonianU72

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Scans of scales, inventories and questionnaires will be available upon request sent per e-mail to: wojciech.korzen@gmail.com

IPD Sharing Time Frame

December 2026 - December 2030

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

For researchers in medical sciences and medical professional upon justification of their request.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings