Long-term Prognosis and Valve Durability of TAVR

April 18, 2024 updated by: LingTao, Xijing Hospital

Long-term Prognosis and Valve Durability of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Valve Disease: a Real-world, Prospective, Single-center, Observational Study

This registry aims to evaluate the long-term prognosis and valve durability of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in a real-world setting. Baseline characteristics, procedural data, and clinical outcomes will be collected in a prospective and observational manner.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Rutao Wang, M.D, Ph.D
  • Phone Number: +86-15091095796
  • Email: rutaowang@qq.com

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shannxi
      • Xi'an, Shannxi, China, 710032
        • Recruiting
        • Xijing Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ling Tao, M.D., Ph.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis or valve regurgitation undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) following evaluation by a cardiac team.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients diagnosed with severe aortic valve regurgitation undergo evaluation by the Heart team and are eligible for TAVR therapy.

2. Patients who understand the purpose of this study, agree to participate in the trial and sign the informed consent form

  • 1. Patients with aortic stenosis or aortic valve insufficiency who were evaluated by the Heart team and underwent TAVR therapy
  • 2. Patients who understand the purpose of the study, agree to participate in the trial and sign the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Patients who cannot provide informed consent
  • 2. Patients who are participating in other clinical trials

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-casuse mortality
Time Frame: 5 years
All-casuse mortality including cardiac death and non-cardiac death
5 years
Valve-related long-term clinical efficacy
Time Frame: 5 years
  • Freedom from bioprosthetic Valve Failure (defined as: Valve- related mortality OR Aortic valve re-operation/re-intervention OR Stage 3 hemodynamic valve deterioration
  • Freedom from stroke or peripheral embolism (presumably valve-related, after ruling out other non-valve aetiologies)
  • Freedom from VARC Type 2-4 bleeding secondary to or exacerbated by antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents, used specifically for valve-related concerns (e.g. clinically apparent leaflet thrombosis)
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Combined early safety and clinical efficacy outcomes
Time Frame: 30 days
Composed by all-cause mortality, all strokes, life-threatening or fatal bleeding, major vascular, access-related, or cardiac structural complication, acute kidney injury stage 3 or 4, moderate or severe aortic regurgitation, new permanent pacemaker due to procedure-related conduction abnormalities, conduction block and arrhythmia, surgery or intervention related to the device, any hospitalization, myocardial infarction, any other adverse events
30 days
Rate of technical success
Time Frame: at exit from procedure room
  • Freedom from mortality
  • Successful access, delivery of the device, and retrieval of the delivery system
  • Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location
  • Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device or to a major vascular or access-related, or cardiac structural complication
at exit from procedure room
Rate of device success
Time Frame: discharge or 30 days
  • Technical success
  • Freedom from mortality
  • Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device or to a major vascular or access-related or cardiac structural complication
  • Intended performance of the valve (mean gradient<20mmHg, and less than moderate aortic regurgitation)
discharge or 30 days
Combined clinical efficacy outcomes
Time Frame: 5 years and 10 years
Combined clinical efficacy outcomes as composed by all-cause mortality (cardiac/non-cardiac), all strokes, any hospitalization
5 years and 10 years
Valve-related long-term clinical efficacy
Time Frame: 10 years
  • Freedom from bioprosthetic Valve Failure (defined as: Valve- related mortality OR Aortic valve re-operation/re-intervention OR Stage 3 hemodynamic valve deterioration
  • Freedom from stroke or peripheral embolism (presumably valve-related, after ruling out other non-valve aetiologies)
  • Freedom from VARC Type 2-4 bleeding secondary to or exacerbated by antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents, used specifically for valve-related concerns (e.g. clinically apparent leaflet thrombosis)
10 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Xijing Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Ling Tao, M.D, Ph.D, Xijing Hospital
  • Study Chair: Rutao Wang, M.D, Ph.D, Xijing Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 18, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 18, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • TRACE TAVR Registry

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings