Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease

May 7, 2025 updated by: First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University

Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Sleep and Cognitive Function in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: a Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study

Previous studies have shown that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can improve cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease (AD), but studies on the improvement of sleep disorders in AD are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of rTMS on sleep and cognition in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique. Some studies have showed that its positive effects in patients with Alzheimer's disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of rTMS on sleep and cognitive function in patients with mild to moderate AD, and to evaluate the glymphatic system function's mediating role between sleep and cognitive function. The study involves participants receiving 10 sessions of high frequency rTMS treatment applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex over a 5 days period or sham rTMS. Neuropsychological testing and polysomnography will be used as the primary outcome measures. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging will be used to explore the effect of rTMS on the glymphatic system function in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Follow-up assessments of the patients' status will be conducted at one and three-month intervals.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Guoping Peng, Doctor
  • Phone Number: 0571-87235859
  • Email: pgpfc@163.com

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310003
        • Recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participant meets 2014 IWG-2 criteria for hippocampal amnestic syndrome, typical of AD, with progressive episodic memory impairment confirmed by neuropsychology. Cerebrospinal fluid markers (Aβ40, Aβ42, T-tau, p-tau) consistent with AD, or AV-45 PET imaging showing significant cortical tracer retention, in line with AD pathophysiology.
  2. Age range: 55-80 years.
  3. No visual or hearing impairment.
  4. Right-handed.
  5. Han nationality.
  6. Signed informed consent.
  7. Reliable caregivers as information providers.
  8. MMSE score: 10-27; CDR: 0.5-2 points.
  9. If receiving approved AD treatment (e.g., acetylcholinesterase inhibitor or memantine), dose must be stable for ≥3 months prior to screening and unchanged unless medically necessary.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of seizures or epilepsy diagnosis;
  2. Stroke history;
  3. Nervous system diseases causing brain dysfunction (schizophrenia, severe anxiety/depression, dementia, Huntington's, brain tumors, Parkinson's, metabolic encephalopathy, encephalitis, MS, epilepsy, brain trauma, hydrocephalus);
  4. Severe liver/kidney/lung dysfunction, anemia, gastrointestinal disease, arrhythmia, recent MI;
  5. Barbiturate/benzodiazepine use within 2 weeks;
  6. MRI/TMS contraindications (metallic implants);
  7. Systemic diseases causing cognitive impairment (hypothyroidism, folate/B12 deficiency, infections, alcohol/drug abuse);
  8. Aphasia, consciousness disturbance, inability to cooperate;
  9. TMS/tDCS/DBS has been processed;
  10. Underlying pathology other than AD;
  11. Focal brain lesions on T1/T2 images;
  12. Refusal to sign informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
participants will receive10 sessions of high frequency rTMS treatment applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex over a 5 days real rTMS
Device: Real repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
The target brain region for stimulation was the left dorsolateral prefrontal lobe. The intensity of the stimulation was 80% of the resting motor threshold (MT) of each subject. In the target brain region, we applied 40 stimuli at a frequency of 20 Hz and the MT for 1600 pulses per session.
Sham Comparator: Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
participants will receive10 sessions of high frequency rTMS treatment applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex over a 5 days sham rTMS
Device: Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
The target brain region for stimulation was the left dorsolateral prefrontal lobe. The intensity of the stimulation was 80% of the resting motor threshold (MT) of each subject. In the target brain region, we applied 40 stimuli at a frequency of 20 Hz and the MT for 1600 pulses per session. The patients were applied with the coil angled away from the head to reproduce the noise of the stimulation as well as some local sensation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive funtion
Time Frame: at baseline (T0), immediately after the end of the treatment (T1), 1month later (T2),3months later
Multidimensional neuropsychological assessment is mainly used to assess the cognitive function of patients. Global cognitive assessment included mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive assessment scale (MoCA). MMSE is widely used in cognitive dysfunction which consists of the following ten parts: orientation, memory, attention and numeracy, ability to recall, language skills, including naming ability, retelling ability, three-step command, reading ability, writing ability. The values range from 0 to 30, with higher score indicating better outcome. MoCA is also an assessment tool for rapid screening of cognitive dysfunction, including 8 cognitive domains such as visual structure skills, executive function, memory, language, attention and concentration, calculation, abstract thinking and orientation. The values range from 0 to 30, with higher score indicating better outcome.
at baseline (T0), immediately after the end of the treatment (T1), 1month later (T2),3months later
Sleep parameters
Time Frame: at baseline (T0), immediately after the end of the treatment (T1), 1month later (T2),3months later
Changes in in sleep/wake architecture assessed by polysomnography. Electrodes attached to the scalp near the frontal, central (top) and occipital (back) portions of the brain and provide a readout of different stages of sleep (N1, N2, N3, REM, and Wakefulness). Total sleep time (TST), sleep efficiency (SE), the percentage of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep time in total sleep time, and the percentage of non-rapid eye movement sleep time in total sleep time were mainly analyzed.
at baseline (T0), immediately after the end of the treatment (T1), 1month later (T2),3months later

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
glymphatic system
Time Frame: at baseline (T0), immediately after the end of the treatment (T1), 1month later (T2),3months later
ALPS-index is a non-invasive diffusion tensor image-based method to measure diffusivity along the perivascular space (ALPS), which measures diffusivity in the direction of the perivascular space in the periventricular white matter. It has been proposed to be an indirect indicator of the state of glymphatic function. ALPS-index = mean(Dxxproj; Dxxasso)/mean(Dyyproj; Dzzasso) Dxxproj means diffusivity along the x-axis in the projection fiber. Dxxassoci means diffusivity along the x-axis in the association fiber. Dyyproj means diffusivity along the y-axis in the projection fiber, Dzzassoci means diffusivity along the z-axis in the association fiber. The values was greater than 0 with lower score indicating more damaged.
at baseline (T0), immediately after the end of the treatment (T1), 1month later (T2),3months later

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Benyan Luo, PhD, Zhejiang University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 16, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 23, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 25, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 7, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • rTMS in AD

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings