Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Versus Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer (ADJUPANC) (ADJUPANC)

January 31, 2025 updated by: Zhang Huo Jun, Changhai Hospital

Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Versus Chemotherapy for Post-operative Pancreatic Cancer

In this trial, we aim to compare the outcomes of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with chemotherapy for patients with resected pancreatic cancer who are at high risk of disease progressions.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Pancreatic cancer is a lethal malignancy with the lowest 5-year overall survival rate of 9% and an increasing incidence. In China, the mortality of pancreatic cancer ranked the sixth among all cancers. Although surgical resection is the only radical treatment, only less than 20% patients could receive upfront surgery at the initial diagnosis. Even though patients have surgery, the incidence of disease progressions, including local progression and metastasis, is about 80-90%. In NCCN guidelines and Chinese guidelines, adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for post-operative pancreatic cancer, while adjuvant chemoradiotherapy could also be used. However, it has not been clarified that which patients may benefit from adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and no high-level evidence has shown the advantages of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy over chemotherapy. In meta-analyses, it was demonstrated that patients with lymph nodes metastases, R1 or R2 resection or lymphovascular invasion could achieve longer survival after adjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared with chemotherapy. Therefore, we aim to compare the outcomes of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with those of chemotherapy in patients with lymph nodes metastases, R1 or R2 resection or lymphovascular invasion after surgical resection of pancreatic cancer.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
770

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200433
        • Recruiting
        • Huojun Zhang
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Huojun Zhang, M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18-75 years
  • Pathologically confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
  • Pathologically confirmed lymph node metastasis, R1 or R2 resection or lymphovascular invasion (one of the risk factors)
  • No history of cancer treatment after surgical resection
  • No disease progression confirmed by imaging examinations
  • ECOG 0 to1 point
  • No abnormality in blood routine test, liver and kidney function test and coagulation test (White blood cell count ≥4.0×10^9/L, neutrophil count ≥2.0×10^9, hemoglobin level ≥100g/L, platelet count ≥100×10^9/L, ALT and AST level < 2.5 times the upper limit of normal, total bilirubin and creatinine level within the normal, international normalized ratio <2)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of cancer treatment after surgical resection
  • History of other cancers within 5 years
  • Disease progression, including local pprogression or metastasis, confirmed by imaging examinations
  • ECOG ≥2 points
  • Significant abnormality in blood routine test, liver and kidney function test and coagulation test
  • Active inflammatory bowel disease
  • Gastrointestinal bleeding or perforation within 6 months
  • Infections requiring antibiotics
  • Heart or respirotory insufficiency
  • Pregnant women or breastfeeding women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: adjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Chemotherapy: Gemcitabine plus capecitabine Gemcitabine, 1000mg/m2，d1, 8, every 3 weeks as a cycle. Capecitabine, 1650-2000mg/m2，bid, d1-14, every 3 weeks as acycle. A total of 6 cycle should be delivered.

Chemoradiotherapy: 2-3 weeks after chemotherapy, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is given. Radiation dose: 50-54Gy (1.8-2.0Gy per fraction). Concurrent capecitabine, 1650mg/m2，bid.
Combination product: Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy
Upfront chemotherapy (gemcitabine plus capecitabine) followed chemoradiotherapy (radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine)
Active Comparator: adjuvant chemotherapy
Gemcitabine, 1000mg/m2，d1, 8, every 3 weeks as a cycle. Capecitabine, 1650-2000mg/m2，bid, d1-14, every 3 weeks as acycle. A total of 6 cycle should be delivered.
Drug: Adjuvant chemotherapy
Chemotherapy (gemcitabine plus capecitabine)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease progression free survival will be determined.
Time Frame: 3 years
The time from the start of treatment until documentation of any clinical or radiological disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. Progression is assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival will be determined.
Time Frame: 3 years
The time from the randomization to death.
3 years
Treatment-related adverse events will be determined.
Time Frame: 3 years
Treatment-related adverse effects are determined by National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.
3 years
Quality of life will be determined.
Time Frame: 3 years
The analysis of quality of life is based on European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). All scales and subscales range from 0 to 100. Regarding physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, social functioning and global health, higher scores may indicate better outcomes. In the case of fatigue, nausea and vomitting, pain, dyspnea, insomina, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties, lower scores may indicate better outcomes. Scales of all items are independent and not combined to compute a total score.
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Changhai Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Huojun Zhang, M.D., Changhai Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 6, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 31, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CH hospital

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings