VibraCool Device to Reduce Pain and Opioid Use After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR)
Clinical Evaluation of an External Neuromodulation Device (VibraCool) to Reduce Pain and Opioid Use After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10032
- Recruiting
- Columbia University Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Lauren H Redler, MD
- Phone Number: 212-305-8188
- Email: lr2505@cumc.columbia.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Underwent ACL reconstruction
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pediatric iliotibial band ACL reconstruction (known to cause significantly more pain)
- Non-english speakers (limitations of our study group)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Standard Ice packs
Standard ice packs applied to knee for 20 minutes a day three times a day
|
Cold also provides peripheral gate-control relief via small, slow C-Fibers that transmit low level pain.
In addition to local pain relief, intense cold can raise the A pain threshold distant to the location.
The mechanism has been called descending or diffuse noxious inhibitory relief, or more recently conditioned pain modulation (CPM).
Injections, aches, and infiltration of local anesthesia and dermal fillers are relieved by applying cold.
For acute injury, near freezing cold relieves pain by suppressing the local metabolic production of inflammation and concomitant tissue ischemia from hypoxia due to the increased metabolic rate.
|
|
Experimental: VibraCool
FDA-approved VibraCool mechanical stimulation and neuromodulatory therapeutic device with ice placed into it and applied to knee for 20 minutes a day, three times a day
|
Multiple studies have shown that vibration sources applied to muscles prior to exercise reduced soreness and lactate dehydrogenase production, and increased range of motion at 48 and 72 hours.
Acute pain results from fast A nerves transmitting nociceptive information to the dorsal column, where the substantia gelatinosa's interneurons prioritize competing A mechanoreceptor and C-fibers to slow pain transmission.
One study observed that stimulation of A mechanoreceptors "shut the gate" on pain transmission, an inhibitory mechanism known as "gate control".
Multiple physical methodologies leverage gate control physiology for pain relief, such as vibratory massage therapy and electrical stimulation to varying degrees.
However, the use of vibratory massage to improve pain control and reduce opioid use following ACLR has not been well studied, and to our knowledge there are no randomized control trials (RCTs) evaluating the use of this modality compared to standard ice or cryocompression.
|
|
Active Comparator: Cryocompression device
Cryocompression device (Game Ready, Bregs) with ice placed into the device and applied to knee for 20 minutes a day, three times a day
|
Cryotherapy has also been used as an adjunctive post-operative therapy to reduce pain and inflammation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).
It has been shown to decrease local metabolism, resulting in reduced pain and inflammation.
Multiple studies have shown the benefits of using cryotherapy after ACLR, and more recently dynamic intermittent compression has been shown to improve circulation while reducing the risk of skin necrosis associated with static permanent compression.
A recent meta-analysis including ten RCTs found significant reductions in post-operative VAS pain scores and breakthrough opioid consumption when using cryotherapy, such as Game Ready or Breggs ice therapy, following ACLR.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Opioid use
Time Frame: First 3 post-operative days
|
Percent of patients discontinuing opioid use by or on post-operative day three, compared to those who continue after day three
|
First 3 post-operative days
|
|
Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain
Time Frame: First 7 post-operative days
|
Scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being the worst pain and 0 being no pain.
Will record daily mean VAS pain scores over the first seven post-operative days
|
First 7 post-operative days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean reduction in opioid use in mg of morphine equivalents per day
Time Frame: First 7 post-operative days
|
mean reduction in opioid use in milligrams of morphine equivalents per day (MMOD) of 30% from patients not using the device over the 7-day period
|
First 7 post-operative days
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference score
Time Frame: First 7 post-operative days
|
PROMIS is a computerized adaptive patient-reported test to measure interference of pain in everyday functioning.
The raw score is converted to a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean and 10 is the standard deviation.
Higher T-scores represent increased pain interference.
|
First 7 post-operative days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Bartels K, Mayes LM, Dingmann C, Bullard KJ, Hopfer CJ, Binswanger IA. Opioid Use and Storage Patterns by Patients after Hospital Discharge following Surgery. PLoS One. 2016 Jan 29;11(1):e0147972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147972. eCollection 2016.
- Clarke H, Soneji N, Ko DT, Yun L, Wijeysundera DN. Rates and risk factors for prolonged opioid use after major surgery: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2014 Feb 11;348:g1251. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1251.
- Bleakley C, McDonough S, MacAuley D. The use of ice in the treatment of acute soft-tissue injury: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Am J Sports Med. 2004 Jan-Feb;32(1):251-61. doi: 10.1177/0363546503260757.
- Webster BS, Verma SK, Gatchel RJ. Relationship between early opioid prescribing for acute occupational low back pain and disability duration, medical costs, subsequent surgery and late opioid use. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Sep 1;32(19):2127-32. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318145a731.
- Scully RE, Schoenfeld AJ, Jiang W, Lipsitz S, Chaudhary MA, Learn PA, Koehlmoos T, Haider AH, Nguyen LL. Defining Optimal Length of Opioid Pain Medication Prescription After Common Surgical Procedures. JAMA Surg. 2018 Jan 1;153(1):37-43. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3132.
- Crystal NJ, Townson DH, Cook SB, LaRoche DP. Effect of cryotherapy on muscle recovery and inflammation following a bout of damaging exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013 Oct;113(10):2577-86. doi: 10.1007/s00421-013-2693-9. Epub 2013 Jul 20.
- Davey MS, Hurley ET, Anil U, Moses A, Thompson K, Alaia M, Strauss EJ, Campbell KA. Pain Management Strategies After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review With Network Meta-analysis. Arthroscopy. 2021 Apr;37(4):1290-1300.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.023. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
- Hollins M, Roy EA, Crane SA. Vibratory antinociception: effects of vibration amplitude and frequency. J Pain. 2003 Sep;4(7):381-91. doi: 10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00714-4.
- Khanna A, Gougoulias N, Maffulli N. Intermittent pneumatic compression in fracture and soft-tissue injuries healing. Br Med Bull. 2008;88(1):147-56. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldn024. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
- Benedetti MG, Boccia G, Cavazzuti L, Magnani E, Mariani E, Rainoldi A, Casale R. Localized muscle vibration reverses quadriceps muscle hypotrophy and improves physical function: a clinical and electrophysiological study. Int J Rehabil Res. 2017 Dec;40(4):339-346. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000242.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- AAAU3696
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.