VibraCool Device to Reduce Pain and Opioid Use After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR)

January 6, 2026 updated by: Lauren H. Redler, Columbia University

Clinical Evaluation of an External Neuromodulation Device (VibraCool) to Reduce Pain and Opioid Use After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR)

The goal of this project is to test the effects of the VibraCool mechanical stimulation neuromodulatory therapeutic device on post-operative pain and opioid use following anterior crucitate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), and thus residual opioids in circulation.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

130

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Recruiting
        • Columbia University Medical Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Underwent ACL reconstruction

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pediatric iliotibial band ACL reconstruction (known to cause significantly more pain)
  • Non-english speakers (limitations of our study group)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard Ice packs
Standard ice packs applied to knee for 20 minutes a day three times a day
Cold also provides peripheral gate-control relief via small, slow C-Fibers that transmit low level pain. In addition to local pain relief, intense cold can raise the A pain threshold distant to the location. The mechanism has been called descending or diffuse noxious inhibitory relief, or more recently conditioned pain modulation (CPM). Injections, aches, and infiltration of local anesthesia and dermal fillers are relieved by applying cold. For acute injury, near freezing cold relieves pain by suppressing the local metabolic production of inflammation and concomitant tissue ischemia from hypoxia due to the increased metabolic rate.
Experimental: VibraCool
FDA-approved VibraCool mechanical stimulation and neuromodulatory therapeutic device with ice placed into it and applied to knee for 20 minutes a day, three times a day
Multiple studies have shown that vibration sources applied to muscles prior to exercise reduced soreness and lactate dehydrogenase production, and increased range of motion at 48 and 72 hours. Acute pain results from fast A nerves transmitting nociceptive information to the dorsal column, where the substantia gelatinosa's interneurons prioritize competing A mechanoreceptor and C-fibers to slow pain transmission. One study observed that stimulation of A mechanoreceptors "shut the gate" on pain transmission, an inhibitory mechanism known as "gate control". Multiple physical methodologies leverage gate control physiology for pain relief, such as vibratory massage therapy and electrical stimulation to varying degrees. However, the use of vibratory massage to improve pain control and reduce opioid use following ACLR has not been well studied, and to our knowledge there are no randomized control trials (RCTs) evaluating the use of this modality compared to standard ice or cryocompression.
Active Comparator: Cryocompression device
Cryocompression device (Game Ready, Bregs) with ice placed into the device and applied to knee for 20 minutes a day, three times a day
Cryotherapy has also been used as an adjunctive post-operative therapy to reduce pain and inflammation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). It has been shown to decrease local metabolism, resulting in reduced pain and inflammation. Multiple studies have shown the benefits of using cryotherapy after ACLR, and more recently dynamic intermittent compression has been shown to improve circulation while reducing the risk of skin necrosis associated with static permanent compression. A recent meta-analysis including ten RCTs found significant reductions in post-operative VAS pain scores and breakthrough opioid consumption when using cryotherapy, such as Game Ready or Breggs ice therapy, following ACLR.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opioid use
Time Frame: First 3 post-operative days
Percent of patients discontinuing opioid use by or on post-operative day three, compared to those who continue after day three
First 3 post-operative days
Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain
Time Frame: First 7 post-operative days
Scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being the worst pain and 0 being no pain. Will record daily mean VAS pain scores over the first seven post-operative days
First 7 post-operative days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean reduction in opioid use in mg of morphine equivalents per day
Time Frame: First 7 post-operative days
mean reduction in opioid use in milligrams of morphine equivalents per day (MMOD) of 30% from patients not using the device over the 7-day period
First 7 post-operative days
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference score
Time Frame: First 7 post-operative days
PROMIS is a computerized adaptive patient-reported test to measure interference of pain in everyday functioning. The raw score is converted to a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean and 10 is the standard deviation. Higher T-scores represent increased pain interference.
First 7 post-operative days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

None will be shared

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative

Clinical Trials on Standard ice packs

Subscribe