Occupational Therapy Intervention on the Prevention of Delirium and Occupational Performance Status in Elderly Patients
Effect of an Occupational Therapy Intervention on the Prevention of Delirium and Occupational Performance Status in Elderly Critical Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Engagement in meaningful occupations promotes health in various contexts and needs to be further investigated regarding its applicability in delirium prevention, associated with cognitive stimulation. Most protocols propose OT sessions twice daily, posing a challenge to their applicability in clinical practice. Therefore, there is also a need to study an intervention with lower frequency and greater feasibility.
In this way, the research will have as its primary objective to Evaluate the effect of a new OT protocol on delirium prevention and occupational performance in elderly patients admitted to critical care units, while the secondary objectives will be:
- Characterize care goals related to occupations according to their respective areas (self-care, productivity, or leisure), patient-defined satisfaction, and importance.
- Assess the impact of OT intervention on cognitive status.
- Identify possible adverse events related to OT intervention. The sample will consist of elderly patients, aged 65 years or older, admitted to the general ICU, and who are not intubated. The sample will be randomized, with patients in the control group receiving standard intervention, while those in the experimental group will receive standard intervention plus daily Occupational Therapy.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Christina Brito
- Phone Number: 5511991065492
- Email: christina.brito@hsl.org.br
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Lorena Montesanti
- Phone Number: 11971935130
- Email: lorena.montesanti@hsl.org.br
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 65 years or older.
- Admission to the general ICU.
- Expected stay of more than 48 hours.
- No severe communication disorder.
- No dependence on mechanical ventilation.
- No diagnosis of other neurocognitive disorders.
- Scoring greater than or equal to -2 on the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe visual impairment that impedes the administration of cognitive testing.
- Limited therapeutic efforts and significant comorbidities with a 90-day mortality expectancy (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)/Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control Group - Standard Protocol
|
|
|
Experimental: Intervention Group - Standard Protocol + Occupational Therapy
|
Occupational Therapy intervention, once a day, for 5 days, for 40 minutes each session.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Delirium prevention
Time Frame: Daily for 5 days, from the initial evaluation. The diagnosis involves four criteria. If the patient scores on criteria 1, 2, and 3 (acute onset or fluctuating course; inattention; altered level of consciousness) or if they score a value ≥2 on criterion 4
|
With the use of Cognitive Assessment Method - Intensive Care Unit (CAM- ICU).
|
Daily for 5 days, from the initial evaluation. The diagnosis involves four criteria. If the patient scores on criteria 1, 2, and 3 (acute onset or fluctuating course; inattention; altered level of consciousness) or if they score a value ≥2 on criterion 4
|
|
Improve occupational performance
Time Frame: At baseline and after of the 5 days. This tool evaluates three domains (importance, occupational performance, and satisfaction) ranging from 1 to 10 points, with higher scores reflecting better outcomes.
|
With the use of Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM).
|
At baseline and after of the 5 days. This tool evaluates three domains (importance, occupational performance, and satisfaction) ranging from 1 to 10 points, with higher scores reflecting better outcomes.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Occupations
Time Frame: At baseline and after of the 5 days. This tool evaluates three domains (importance, occupational performance, and satisfaction) ranging from 1 to 10 points, with higher scores reflecting better outcomes.
|
Characterize care goals related to occupations according to the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM).
|
At baseline and after of the 5 days. This tool evaluates three domains (importance, occupational performance, and satisfaction) ranging from 1 to 10 points, with higher scores reflecting better outcomes.
|
|
Cognitive Status
Time Frame: At baseline and after of the 5 days. The MoCA Test has scores ranging from 0 to 30 points, with higher scores representing better cognitive performance. Scores above 26 are considered normal.
|
With the use of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA test).
|
At baseline and after of the 5 days. The MoCA Test has scores ranging from 0 to 30 points, with higher scores representing better cognitive performance. Scores above 26 are considered normal.
|
|
Adverse effects
Time Frame: Daily for five days, from the initial occupational therapy evaluation.
|
Descriptive and quantitative analysis of occurences.
|
Daily for five days, from the initial occupational therapy evaluation.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- AVAP-NG 3405
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.